| |
On the Democrats' $100 Trillion Agenda: |
|
| |
"Remember when Democrats complained that $5.7 billion for a border wall was too expensive? Well, that's chump change compared to what many of the congressional Democrats and nearly all of those 15 declared Democrats in the presidential race are now rallying behind.
"The price tag isn't in the billions but in the tens of trillions. President Trump was attacked earlier this month by Democrats for a budget blueprint that would run fiscal deficits of 5 percent of GDP. That's too high, for sure, but count up the spending plans of Democrats and deficits could easily hit 20 to 30 percent of GDP and tilt the nation toward Greek and Puerto Rican-style bankruptcy. ...
"Add it all up and the estimated 10-year cost of creating the Democratic-socialist utopia envisioned by the likes of Ocasio-Cortez, Sen. Bernie Sanders and other leaders of the Democratic Party reaches well north of $100 trillion. ...
"The Democrats balked at spending $5.7 billion to protect American communities by securing the border, but they're perfectly happy to mortgage our future by spending nearly 20,000 times that amount on their own utopian fantasies. We will all have everything we want, and our country will be bankrupt." |
|
| |
— Stephen Moore, Economist, Heritage Foundation Distinguished Visiting Fellow
|
|
|
— Stephen Moore, Economist, Heritage Foundation Distinguished Visiting Fellow
|
|
Posted March 19, 2019 • 08:02 AM
|
|
|
| |
On Gun Control and the New Zealand Terrorist Attack: |
|
| |
"For some reason, gun-grabbing liberals seem to think that the existence of people who want to shoot random civilians should make us want to be less able to defend ourselves. Uh, no. The horrifying New Zealand terrorist attack would usually have drawn universal attacks by liberals on law-abiding Americans and their rights. On the upside, the dishonest and disgraceful slander of fellow Americans that usually accompanies these events was comparatively muted, perhaps because this loser (who should die anonymously, his videos unviewed, his manifesto unread, and his name unspoken) was so transparently attempting to provide everyone with fodder to hate their political opponents. To rile liberals, he mixed in references to Trump and Candace Owens; to outrage us Normals, he embraced leftism and environmental wackoism. It was a scam to set us at each other's throats. The proper response to this creep's crude manipulation is to not pretend that he was motivated by anything other than resentment over his own manifest inadequacies and failures. To hang this idiot's acts on one's political opponents for cheesy short-term rhetorical advantage is to play his game; instead, we should come together in the hope that the Kiwis hang that idiot." |
|
| |
— Kurt Schlichter, Townhall.com
|
|
|
— Kurt Schlichter, Townhall.com
|
|
Posted March 18, 2019 • 08:01 AM
|
|
|
| |
On Pots, Kettles, and the Southern Poverty Law Center: |
|
| |
"There's a big shakeup going down at the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) this week. In a surprise announcement on Thursday, the hateful left-wing 'hate watch' group disclosed the sudden firing of co-founder Morris Dees. Although the SPLC declined to specify why, reports of racial bias and a possible #MeToo situation quickly surfaced.
"Josh Moon, a columnist with the Alabama Reporter, tweeted, 'The SPLC fired Morris Dees yesterday and announced it today. Multiple sources have told me that the allegations of inappropriate conduct involve sexual harassment incidents. Multiple incidents that have come to light after an initial recent allegation.'
"He followed up with, 'I have been sent a number of internal SPLC emails that address the ongoing situation and specifically discuss Dees. Looks like a combination of complaints regarding sexual harassment and racial biases in promotion and hierarchy led to this.'
"The LA Times reported that after the recent resignation of a female African-American lawyer, SPLC staff wrote a letter to management this week saying, in part, 'Allegations of mistreatment, sexual harassment, gender discrimination, and racism threaten the moral authority of this organization and our integrity along with it.'" |
|
| |
— Alexa Moutevelis Coombs, MRC Culture's On TV Blog Editor
|
|
|
— Alexa Moutevelis Coombs, MRC Culture's On TV Blog Editor
|
|
Posted March 15, 2019 • 07:37 AM
|
|
|
| |
On the College Admissions Scandal: |
|
| |
"Money talks. But news that famous actresses Felicity Huffman and Lori Loughlin, along with 40 other people, were charged in a scheme to buy their kids' entrance into elite schools is shameful.
"According to U.S. Attorney Andrew Lelling, well-to-do parents bribed college coaches and others to help grease the skids for their children so they might sit alongside the brightest minds in the country. ...
"These crimes are an affront to all the hardworking students who were not able to buy their way in to these institutions. The message sent to them is that power and influence supersede achievement and merit.
"Any admissions officer found to be complicit in this scam must be fired today. Likewise, the presidents in the named colleges must apologize to their students and their communities and offer full and direct explanations for their infractions.
"Some may say that this kind of thing happens all the time in the form of donations or nepotism, for example. Perhaps so, but now is as good a time as ever to make sure it doesn't happen again. It is going to take work to cast off this disgraceful legacy." |
|
| |
— Boston Herald Editorial Staff
|
|
|
— Boston Herald Editorial Staff
|
|
Posted March 14, 2019 • 08:02 AM
|
|
|
| |
On President Trump's Budget Proposal: |
|
| |
"President Trump released his third White House budget proposal today, and kudos to his acting budget director Russ Vought for crafting a plan that promotes fiscal restraint. Under this budget request, hundreds of wasteful programs will be eliminated and every domestic agency will be required to make a 5 percent cutback in spending. This budget blueprint includes $2.7 trillion in government spending cuts over the next decade. ...
"Trump will have to enforce this latest budget with steely resolve. So far he has used the veto pen sparingly. Now he must recognize that it is his best weapon to prevent a dangerous fiscal situation. His first two budgets were almost completely ignored by a Republican Congress. (Excessive pork spending is a bipartisan problem on Capitol Hill.) House Republicans, outside the Freedom Caucus, showed no interest in curbing spending.
"But now Trump faces House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, whose Democratic caucus wants free everything. House Financial Services Chairwoman Maxine Waters said this weekend that she is committed to increasing the budget on social programs and reversing the few cuts that Trump has already made. The only idea for paying for the Green New Deal, Medicare for All, $15 minimum wage, Social Security benefit hikes, free college tuition, and the like are by repealing the Republican tax cuts. First, that is not going to happen. Second, this would only pay for a sliver of the cost.
"The most powerful tool Trump has over legislation is the veto. He needs to use it often in the months ahead for his agenda. Trump should declare that if spending bills come in even a dime over his new budget totals, he will veto each and every one. The budget crafted by Vought is a powerful fiscal marker that must be enforced. This is his best tool for controlling federal spending, and presidents have historically used it to great effect." |
|
| |
— Stephen Moore, Economist, Heritage Foundation Distinguished Visiting Fellow
|
|
|
— Stephen Moore, Economist, Heritage Foundation Distinguished Visiting Fellow
|
|
Posted March 13, 2019 • 08:20 AM
|
|
|
| |
On Calls for President Trump's Impeachment: |
|
| |
"House Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced Monday that she's against impeaching President Trump 'unless there's something so compelling and overwhelming and bipartisan.' Which is exactly the point -- there isn't. ...
"Now, will Pelosi call off the dogs? Committee Chairmen Jerry Nadler and Adam Schiff will keep on subpoenaing away, and grandstanding for the cameras -- in hopes of maybe somehow, someday, somewhere finding some genuine dirt, while at least harassing the president, his family and associates and feeding an endless string of breathless this time, Trump is going down reports.
"Just as impeachment would be bad for the Democrats, chances are Americans will note that the press has been blaring those 'scoops' for more than two years now, and not a one has panned out. Keeping it up only shows that not just the Democratic Party, but also most of the media, can't stop themselves from playing to the unhinged left." |
|
| |
— New York Post Editorial Board
|
|
|
— New York Post Editorial Board
|
|
Posted March 12, 2019 • 08:10 AM
|
|
|
| |
On Attempts to 'Save' the Internet: |
|
| |
"Congressional Democrats want you to think that they're going to save the Internet. But the Internet never needed saving. That was true when the Obama administration first passed 'net neutrality' regulations in 2015 and also when those regulations were repealed.
"On Wednesday, House Democrats proposed a bill to bring back those old rules and reverse a 2017 deregulation by the Trump administration. It's called, with apocalyptic flair, the Save the Internet Act.
"The issue of net neutrality is relatively complex, and proponents have done a great job of leading the public to believe that without its framework, the free and open Internet we've come to know and love is a goner. But time and experience have proven that this isn't true. ...
"And the net neutrality advocates who did so much to scare people in 2017, at this point, have a lot of explaining to do." |
|
| |
— Madeline Fry, Washington Examiner
|
|
|
— Madeline Fry, Washington Examiner
|
|
Posted March 11, 2019 • 08:06 AM
|
|
|
| |
On the Crisis at the Border: |
|
| |
"We interrupt the talk of the president 'manufacturing' a crisis at the border with this hair-raising report about the crisis at the border.
"Alarming new numbers about border apprehensions from U.S. Customs and Border Protection should puncture the lazy conventional wisdom about the border being under control, except in the lurid imagination of President Donald Trump. ...
"More than 76,000 migrants were apprehended crossing the southern border last month, the highest February in more than 10 years and the highest month of the Trump administration. The number of apprehensions tops any month during the 2014 border surge under President Barack Obama, which no one had a problem calling a crisis at the time.
"Every indication is that the situation is going to get worse." |
|
| |
— Rich Lowry, National Review Editor
|
|
|
— Rich Lowry, National Review Editor
|
|
Posted March 08, 2019 • 08:16 AM
|
|
|
| |
On Defending the Indefensible: |
|
| |
"Democrats seeking the party's 2020 presidential nomination are starting to come out in defense of Rep. Ilhan Omar, and in the process, they are normalizing anti-Semitism.
"Leading Democratic candidates Sens. Kamala Harris, Bernie Sanders, and Elizabeth Warren have all come out defending Omar and pointing fingers at her critics, despite a series of statements she has made targeting American Jews.
"Omar has been unrepentant over statements she made lamenting the influence of Jewish money in politics and questioning whether Jews were more loyal to Israel than America. The bigoted statements perpetuated classic anti-Semitic stereotypes, but that is now what's considered acceptable in the Democratic Party -- as long as it gets subsequently laundered as mere criticism of Israel. ...
"Democrats tried to push a sham resolution generically condemning anti-Semitism that didn't include Omar. But that proved too controversial within a caucus that is increasingly comfortable with anti-Semitism. So it's now unclear if any resolution is going to come up for a vote at all, at least not without substantial changes condemning other forms of hate in a way that further waters down any statement it would be making about Omar.
"All along, I've noted that this isn't primarily a story about Omar, who we know is an anti-Semite. It's about whether Democrats care about combating anti-Semitism.
"The signal leading Democrats are sending is not only that anti-Semitism will be tolerated within their party, but the more unapologetic somebody is about their anti-Semitism, the more likely they are to be defended."
Read entire article here. |
|
| |
— Philip Klein, Washington Examiner Executive Editor
|
|
|
— Philip Klein, Washington Examiner Executive Editor
|
|
Posted March 07, 2019 • 08:03 AM
|
|
|
| |
On the Cost of Taking Down President Trump: |
|
| |
"Whatever one thinks of Trump, the ploys to take him down are not without cost. For anyone paying attention, it is hard to overstate the damage done to the credibility of federal institutions like the Justice Department in the scorched earth effort to end his presidency. While Congress is no stranger to low approval ratings, the circus like hearings that the Democrats plan to continue will do nothing to enhance the faith of the American people in it.
"It is crystal clear those on the left have an unhealthy hatred for Trump and will leap at any excuse to remove him from office instead of waiting for the 2020 election. They neither respect the decision of the American people in the 2016 election nor their right to vote in the next one. The Democrats are hellbent on finding any way they can to take down Trump. They could care less about whatever they have to obstruct or destroy in the process." |
|
| |
— Buck Sexton, Radio and Podcast Host, Former CIA Officer and NYC Police Department Analyst
|
|
|
— Buck Sexton, Radio and Podcast Host, Former CIA Officer and NYC Police Department Analyst
|
|
Posted March 06, 2019 • 08:05 AM
|
|
|
|