| |
On the Rerun of the Summer of '68: |
|
| |
"Call it the summer of '68.
"Rioters in the streets.
"Communists on the ballot.
"Radical leftists threaten to kidnap, rape and torture political enemies. Even the children of political enemies. ...
"There is good news. In the summer of 1968, sober-minded American voters saw the daily drumbeat of the 'Antifa' fascists on television. Voters did not freak out and riot back in the streets. They did not arm up and shoot back.
"No, they just showed up at the voting booth in November. And delivered one of the most stunning rebukes to the 'Antifa' fascist crowd in U.S. history.
"So, 'Antifa,' please, keep the riots going. And definitely keep up your calls to abolish ICE. That is a real winner." |
|
| |
— Charles Hurt, Washington Times
|
|
|
— Charles Hurt, Washington Times
|
|
Posted July 03, 2018 • 08:08 AM
|
|
|
| |
On the Left’s Response to SCOTUS Travel-Ban Ruling: |
|
| |
"When the U.S. Supreme Court decided Tuesday to endorse the president's so-called 'Muslim ban,' the Left's knee-jerk response was typically predictable, pathetic, and phony: 'Trump is a racist!' ...
"Despite the Left's now-yawn-inducing screams of 'racism,' this policy has nothing to do with Islamophobia. And it never did. It concerns U.S. national security and counter-terrorism. ...
"Individuals who traveled from or through these 'countries of concern,' as they are known officially, have experienced increased scrutiny since December 2015. Donald J. Trump was not president back then. In fact, as anti-Trump CNN reported on January 30, 2017: "The seven Muslim-majority countries targeted in President Trump's executive order on immigration were initially identified as 'countries of concern' under the Obama administration." (Emphasis added.) By the Left's logic, compiling this list of 'countries of concern' would make Barack Hussein Obama an anti-Muslim bigot.
"Once again, the fact that the Left went from zero to racism in just 10 seconds after Tuesday's Supreme Court decision confirms that the Democrat choir has just one hymn in its missal. How sad. How ugly." |
|
| |
— Deroy Murdock, National Review Online Contributing Editor and Fox News Contributor
|
|
|
— Deroy Murdock, National Review Online Contributing Editor and Fox News Contributor
|
|
Posted July 02, 2018 • 07:52 AM
|
|
|
| |
On Sanctuary Cities and Immigration Enforcement: |
|
| |
"Prominent Democratic pollster Mark Penn said on Thursday that a vast majority of Americans don't really support so-called sanctuary cities that shield immigrants in the country illegally from deportation.
"Penn, who served as chief strategist for Hillary Clinton's 2008 presidential campaign, revealed that 84 percent of Americans favor turning undocumented immigrants over to federal agents. ...
"Penn said the response was strikingly 'out of sync' with what the public might think about sanctuary cities. The broad term refers to cities that don't fully cooperate with federal authorities when it comes to turning over people in the country illegally to immigration enforcement." |
|
| |
|
|
Posted June 29, 2018 • 08:50 AM
|
|
|
| |
On SCOTUS Justice Anthony Kennedy's Retirement: |
|
| |
"Justice Anthony Kennedy's retirement from the Supreme Court is going to have immediate political consequences by creating a headache for red state Senate Democrats seeking reelection. ...
"Democrats are expected to overwhelmingly oppose any of the 25 names that Trump has promised he'd choose from, and they'll be under pressure from their base to pull out all stops to try and block a vote.
"But the political incentives of the party as a whole are much different than the pressures facing the Democratic Senators up for re-election in red states.
"In 2018, there are 10 Democrats seeking re-election in states that Trump carried in 2016. Of those, five races are viewed as 'tossups' by Cook Political report: Sens. Bill Nelson of Florida, Joe Donnelly in Indiana, Claire McCaskill in Missouri, Heidi Heitkamp in North Dakota, and Joe Manchin in West Virginia.
"The difficulty faced by red state Democrats is that even in a more conservative states, a substantial portion of their base is going to be fiercely anti-Trump, and opposed to any of his judicial nominees. At the same time, particularly in the very red states (Missouri, North Dakota, Indiana, and West Virginia) where Trump won big, it's going to be really difficult to vote 'no' on a qualified Supreme Court nominee." |
|
| |
— Philip Klein, Washington Examiner Managing Editor
|
|
|
— Philip Klein, Washington Examiner Managing Editor
|
|
Posted June 28, 2018 • 07:47 AM
|
|
|
| |
On the Supreme Court's Travel Ban Ruling: |
|
| |
"So much for the claim that Donald Trump's strident campaign rhetoric about Muslims rendered him unfit to wield the powers of the presidency. The Supreme Court will have none of it.
"That's the bottom line in the justices' blockbuster decision to back President Trump against a suit by Hawaii on the so-called Muslim travel ban, overruling the lower courts.
"Not only that, but the decision was a major blow to the 'judicial resistance' -- the attempts by judges to constrain Trump's clearly vested powers because they don't like the president who's wielding them.
"The vote may have been a narrow five to four. It was backed up, though, by a thumping decision by Chief Justice John Roberts, eviscerating claims by the judicial resistance to Trump. ...
"So clearly did the high court assert Trump's authority under the Immigration and Nationality Act that this case could well be remembered for its weakening of the judicial resistance seeking to use the courts to undo the voters' choice in 2016." |
|
| |
— Seth Lipsky, New York Post
|
|
|
— Seth Lipsky, New York Post
|
|
Posted June 27, 2018 • 08:51 AM
|
|
|
| |
On the Collapse of Civil Political Discourse: |
|
| |
"Two senior Trump administration officials were heckled at restaurants. A third was denied service. Florida GOP Attorney General Pam Bondi required a police escort away from a movie about Mister Rogers after activists yelled at her in Tampa -- where two other Republican lawmakers say they were also politically harassed last week, one of them with her kids in tow.
"In the Donald Trump era, the left is as aggressively confrontational as anyone can remember.
"What it means for 2018 -- whether it portends a blue wave of populist revolt for Democrats or a red wall of silent majority resistance from Republicans -- largely depends on one's political persuasion. But there's a bipartisan sense that this election season marks another inflection point in the collapse of civil political discourse." |
|
| |
— Marc Caputo and Daniel Lippman, POLITICO
|
|
|
— Marc Caputo and Daniel Lippman, POLITICO
|
|
Posted June 26, 2018 • 08:10 AM
|
|
|
| |
On Congressional Democrats and Securing the Border: |
|
| |
"Because stopping illegal immigration is popular in much of the nation, it is not surprising that an early poll finds most criticism directed at the Central American parents who risk their children's lives by bringing them on the dangerous journey or sending them with smugglers.
"Rasmussen reports that 54 percent of likely voters said the parents are more to blame for the crisis, against 35 percent who say the government is more to blame.
"Meanwhile, the left is going in the opposite direction by uniting behind California Sen. Dianne Feinstein, who turned 85 last week and is seeking another six-year term. Trying to rally the far-left base in her blue state, Feinstein authored a bill that would, among other things, prohibit an arrest for illegal entry anywhere within 100 miles of a border.
"Incredibly, the other 48 Senate Dems signed on, meaning they've all cast their lots with an outlandishly radical policy.
"Yet Feinstein and others insist they don't favor open borders. OK, then, let's put it this way: they favor no borders and want the US to admit the whole world, free of charge and no questions asked.
"Yeah, that'll sell in November." |
|
| |
— Michael Goodwin, New York Post
|
|
|
— Michael Goodwin, New York Post
|
|
Posted June 25, 2018 • 08:35 AM
|
|
|
| |
On Charles Krauthammer: |
|
| |
"Charles Krauthammer, a longtime Fox News contributor, Pulitzer Prize winner, Harvard-trained psychiatrist and best-selling author who came to be known as the dean of conservative commentators, died Thursday. He was 68. ...
"In recent years, Krauthammer was best known for his nightly appearance as a panelist on Fox News' 'Special Report with Bret Baier' and as a commentator on various Fox news shows. ...
"But Krauthammer was arguably a Renaissance man, achieving mastery in such disparate fields as psychiatry, speech-writing, print journalism and television. He won the Edwin Dunlop Prize for excellence in psychiatric research and clinical medicine. Journalism honors included the Pulitzer Prize for Commentary for his Washington Post columns in 1987 and the National Magazine Award for his work at The New Republic in 1984. His book, 'Things That Matter: Three Decades of Passions, Pastimes and Politics,' instantly became a New York Times bestseller, remaining in the number one slot for 10 weeks, and on the coveted list for nearly 40." |
|
| |
— Elizabeth Llorente, Fox News
|
|
|
— Elizabeth Llorente, Fox News
|
|
Posted June 22, 2018 • 08:08 AM
|
|
|
| |
On Google and the NY Revenge-Porn Bill: |
|
| |
"New York's revenge-porn bill died early Thursday morning after the Senate adjourned for the year and took no action in the wake of an 11th-hour campaign by Google against the legislation.
"The proposal -- which has languished in Albany since its introduction in 2013 and was recently taken up again after a Post expose -- would have made nonconsensual dissemination of sexually explicit images a misdemeanor punishable by up to a year in jail.
"It would have also helped victims sue Web hosts to remove the offending images.
"But Google mounted a late effort against the bill, with the Internet behemoth opposed to any government oversight over how it regulates content." |
|
| |
— Kirstan Conley and Gabrielle Fonrouge, New York Post
|
|
|
— Kirstan Conley and Gabrielle Fonrouge, New York Post
|
|
Posted June 21, 2018 • 08:08 AM
|
|
|
| |
On U.S. Withdrawal From U.N. Human Rights Council: |
|
| |
"Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley were right to withdraw U.S. membership from the U.N. Human Rights Council on Tuesday.
"While that council purports to defend human rights, it actually focuses on far less noble objectives. Namely, attacking Israel, challenging Western liberal values of free speech, and lending moral credibility to the world's most unpleasant regimes. Ignoring repeated U.S. challenges to address those failings, the council deserves neither U.S. diplomatic credibility nor U.S. taxpayer dollars. ...
"The U.N.'s own statistics show that the U.S. was the largest voluntary contributor to the organization's 2017 human rights efforts. The Human Rights Council will surely miss that money. But if they want it back, they need only to start living up to their name." |
|
| |
— Tom Rogan, Washington Examiner
|
|
|
— Tom Rogan, Washington Examiner
|
|
Posted June 20, 2018 • 07:51 AM
|
|
|
|