| |
On Using the Colorado Shooting Rampage for Propaganda: |
|
| |
"Since so many in the media cannot resist turning every tragedy into a political talking point, it was perhaps inevitable that (1) someone would try to link the shooting rampage at the Batman movie in Colorado to the tea party movement, and that (2) some would try to make it a reason to impose more gun control laws.
Too many people in the media cannot seem to tell the difference between reporting the news and creating propaganda. ...
"The real problem, both in discussions of mass shootings and in discussions of gun control, is that too many people are too committed to a vision to allow mere facts to interfere with their beliefs, and the sense of superiority that those beliefs give them.
"Any discussion of facts is futile when directed at such people. All anyone can do is warn others about the propaganda." |
|
| |
— Thomas Sowell, Economist, Author and Hoover Institution Senior Fellow
|
|
|
— Thomas Sowell, Economist, Author and Hoover Institution Senior Fellow
|
|
Posted July 24, 2012 • 07:34 AM
|
|
|
| |
On the Latest News on Tax Fairness: |
|
| |
"One reason our country is so divided is because the president keeps dividing us. If taxes need to be raised to fight a war or fund a cause, the president should ask everyone to pitch in. If the need is national, the solution should be national -- and that includes all of us.
"But that's not how Mr. Obama governs. We learned during the 2008 campaign that he believes in spreading the wealth around. And recently we learned he doesn't believe that successful people made it on their own. Without the government, the president tells us, job creators and entrepreneurs would not be able to make it in America.
"It's really the other way around. Without job creators and the successful, the government wouldn't have any money. So next time Mr. Obama meets someone in the top 1% or even the top 20%, instead of saying they're not paying their fair share, he should simply say thank you." |
|
| |
— Ari Fleischer, President of Ari Fleischer Communications and Former Press Secretary for President George W. Bush
|
|
|
— Ari Fleischer, President of Ari Fleischer Communications and Former Press Secretary for President George W. Bush
|
|
Posted July 23, 2012 • 07:58 AM
|
|
|
| |
On the Difference Between Left and Right: |
|
| |
"The argument between left and right is about what you do beyond infrastructure. It’s about transfer payments and redistributionist taxation, about geometrically expanding entitlements, about tax breaks and subsidies to induce actions pleasing to central planners. It’s about free contraceptives for privileged students and welfare without work — the latest Obama entitlement-by-decree that would fatally undermine the great bipartisan welfare reform of 1996. It’s about endless government handouts that, ironically, are crowding out necessary spending on, yes, infrastructure. ...
"Beyond infrastructure, the conservative sees the proper role of government as providing not European-style universal entitlements but a firm safety net ...
"Limited government so conceived has two indispensable advantages. It avoids inexorable European-style national insolvency. And it avoids breeding debilitating individual dependency. It encourages and celebrates character, independence, energy, hard work as the foundations of a free society and a thriving economy — precisely the virtues Obama discounts and devalues in his accounting of the wealth of nations." |
|
| |
— Charles Krauthammer, Syndicated Columnist
|
|
|
— Charles Krauthammer, Syndicated Columnist
|
|
Posted July 20, 2012 • 07:59 AM
|
|
|
| |
On the Impact of the Nation's Economy in the 2012 Presidential Election: |
|
| |
"Declining confidence in the nation’s economic prospects appears to be the most powerful force influencing voters as the presidential election gears up, undercutting key areas of support for President Obama and helping give his Republican challenger, Mitt Romney, an advantage on the question of who would better handle the nation’s economic challenges, according to the latest New York Times/CBS News Poll.
"Despite months of negative advertising from Mr. Obama and his Democratic allies seeking to further define Mr. Romney as out of touch with the middle class and representative of wealthy interests, the poll shows little evidence of any substantial nationwide shift in attitudes about Mr. Romney." |
|
| |
— Jim Rutenberg and Marjorie Connelly, The New York Times
|
|
|
— Jim Rutenberg and Marjorie Connelly, The New York Times
|
|
Posted July 19, 2012 • 07:55 AM
|
|
|
| |
On the President's Achilles Heel - Unrestricted Welfare: |
|
| |
"Obama is trying to persuade Americans that while he has expanded food stamps to unprecedented levels, extended unemployment insurance to 99 weeks, vastly increased the already overwhelmed Medicaid program, created a new trillion dollar entitlement with Obamacare and expanded the size of the federal government to a percentage of gross domestic product not seen since World War II, that he is not the dependency president. By stepping back into history to embrace the Democrats' nemesis -- unrestricted welfare -- he has clinched the argument for the opposition." |
|
| |
— Mona Charen, Syndicated Columnist
|
|
|
— Mona Charen, Syndicated Columnist
|
|
Posted July 18, 2012 • 08:54 AM
|
|
|
| |
On Obama's Apparent Disdain for the Self-Made Man: |
|
| |
"If Bartlett’s ever puts together a collection of insultingly deflating quotations, it should include President Barack Obama’s take on business success before a crowd in Virginia the other day: 'If you’ve been successful, you didn’t get there on your own.' ...
"There are few phrases that President Obama likes less than 'on your own.' He considers it a lie when people think they’ve made it on their own, and he thinks that the most damning thing that can be said about the Republican vision is that it will leave people on their own. For him, 'we’re in this together,' and the inspiring institution embodying that togetherness is none other than the Internal Revenue Service." |
|
| |
— Rich Lowry, National Review Editor
|
|
|
— Rich Lowry, National Review Editor
|
|
Posted July 17, 2012 • 08:01 AM
|
|
|
| |
On More of the Same from Another Obama Term: |
|
| |
"By any yardstick, Obama’s on the losing side of almost every major domestic issue. The vast majority of Americans simply don’t want what he’s selling. ...
"In certain circumstances, of course, political leadership can mean bucking popularity. But the privilege comes with a requirement: Defiance of public will must be proved correct. Your policies must, in reasonable time, achieve results the public demands.
"When they fail — think 8.2 percent unemployment for more than three years amid rising debt and deficits — a true leader accepts the need to try a different course. Only a zealot, blinded by ideology or indifference, would insist on more of the same." |
|
| |
— Michael Goodwin, New York Post
|
|
|
— Michael Goodwin, New York Post
|
|
Posted July 16, 2012 • 08:10 AM
|
|
|
| |
On Presidential Aspirant Mitt Romney's NAACP Speech: |
|
| |
"Is the Romney campaign depending too much on bad economic news to get their guy elected? The argument gaining traction among conservatives is that the Romneyites aren’t making a strong-enough case for his candidacy. They aren’t embracing a vision of the country and its future; they aren’t elevating the discussion; they aren’t supplying enough specifics. ...
"True, the Romney campaign isn’t generating reams of documents from its various committees the way previous campaigns have. But campaign substance can come in many forms. Romney took a major leap forward on Wednesday with the best speech he’s ever given, before the NAACP.
"In graceful and clear language before an audience that was hostile at best, Romney connected the need for education reform and stable family life to the disproportionate negative effect the economic troubles have had on the African-American community. It was powerful, effective and substantive." |
|
| |
— John Podhoretz, New York Post
|
|
|
— John Podhoretz, New York Post
|
|
Posted July 13, 2012 • 08:04 AM
|
|
|
| |
On the Importance of Understanding Operation Fast and Furious: |
|
| |
"Most Americans don't care about whether Attorney General Eric Holder is hiding Fast and Furious documents because they don't understand the story.
"Until someone can tell us otherwise, there is only one explanation for why President Obama's Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives gave thousands of guns to Mexican drug dealers: It put guns in their hands to strengthen liberals' argument for gun control.
"Precisely because this is such a jaw-dropping accusation -- criminality at the highest level of government to score a political point -- Republicans refuse to make it.
"But the problem with Republican rectitude in discussing this scandal is that as soon as they start talking about subpoenas and dates and documents, TV channels change across America. They're never going to get answers unless they first explain to the American people why it matters." |
|
| |
— Ann Coulter, Syndicated Columnist
|
|
|
— Ann Coulter, Syndicated Columnist
|
|
Posted July 12, 2012 • 07:34 AM
|
|
|
| |
On the President's Proposed Tax-the-Rich Scheme: |
|
| |
"[T]he president wants to increase spending even faster than he wants to increase taxes. President Obama’s proposed tax hike would raise roughly $65 billion in 2013. At the same time, the president proposes to increase spending next year by $202 billion. The tax hike would pay for only 32 percent of the proposed new spending. Or put it another way: Over ten years, the new taxes would cover roughly half of the $1.6 trillion in new subsidies and Medicaid spending under Obamacare.
"That means that not a penny of Obama’s proposed tax increase would, in fact, go toward reducing the budget deficit, let alone paying down the debt. Rather, every cent of the tax hike would go toward paying for increased federal spending.
"And it is that spending, and the bigger and more intrusive government it represents, that is the real burden on the economy and the American people. President Obama’s tax hike is just a symptom of the big-government disease." |
|
| |
— Michael Tanner, Cato Institute Senior Fellow
|
|
|
— Michael Tanner, Cato Institute Senior Fellow
|
|
Posted July 11, 2012 • 07:51 AM
|
|
|
|