CFIF often highlights how the Biden Administration's bizarre decision to resurrect failed Title II "…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
Image of the Day: U.S. Internet Speeds Skyrocketed After Ending Failed Title II "Net Neutrality" Experiment

CFIF often highlights how the Biden Administration's bizarre decision to resurrect failed Title II "Net Neutrality" internet regulation, which caused private broadband investment to decline for the first time ever outside of a recession during its brief experiment at the end of the Obama Administration, is a terrible idea that will only punish consumers if allowed to take effect.

Here's what happened after that brief experiment was repealed under the Trump Administration and Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chairman Ajit Pai - internet speeds skyrocketed despite late-night comedians' and left-wing activists' warnings that the internet was doomed:

[caption id="" align="aligncenter" width="515"] Internet Speeds Post-"Net Neutrality"[/caption]

 …[more]

April 19, 2024 • 09:51 AM

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Four Radical Reforms to Shrink the Federal Budget
By Stephen Moore
Wednesday, May 01 2024
It was nearly 50 years ago that a liberal Congress completely dominated by Democrat big spenders passed a new set of budget rules – the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974. It has been a complete and unmitigated disaster. Since the act's passage, the budget has been balanced four times and unbalanced 46 times. This was by design. Despite being called a "budget reform" law, the act was intended to grease the skids for new spending, but even Congress members in the '70s who designed it that way couldn't have imagined the Pandora's box of spending and…
 
Trusting China in Inviting Another Pandemic
It's one thing to die from natural causes. Worse, to die from a disease leaked by Chinese scientists…
Read more...
The 'Biden Bump' That Didn't Last Long
"The election is clearly changing now, moving towards Biden," the influential Democratic strategist…
Read more...
 
Joe Biden Says There Are Very Fine People on Both Sides of the Oct. 7 Debate
"I condemn the antisemitic protests ..." President Joe Biden told reporters after days of anti-Jewish…
Read more...
Drug Shortages Reach Record High Following Biden’s Price Controls
Want to find a rare point of intellectual consensus amid our stubborn ideological divisions?  …
Read more...
 
Stop the 'Emergency Spending' Charade Already
This week, Congress moved closer to passing four separate bills with $95 billion in funding for Ukraine…
Read more...
Why Small Businesses Hate Bidenomics
If the economy is so good, why do small business leaders feel so bad? The latest Small Business Optimism…
Read more...
 
There's No Right to Sleep Outdoors
In a Supreme Court showdown Monday over whether the homeless have a "right" to camp in public…
Read more...
Groupthink Chorus Emerges at Trump Trial
Covering former President Donald Trump's trial on television is a difficult job. There are no cameras…
Read more...
 
CFIF Applauds Tennessee General Assembly for Passing Significant Certificate of Need (CON) Reform Legislation
CFIF stands ready and willing to work with lawmakers and stakeholders to address remaining CON regulations…
Read more...
The World Is Paying a Deadly Price for Barack Obama's Foreign Policy Legacy
If a belligerent state launched 185 explosive drones, 36 cruise missiles and 110 surface-to-surface missiles…
Read more...
Notable Quote   
 
"Conservative legal commentators are usually very cautious whether on cable or radio broadcasts or in-print for some obvious reasons detailed below. Legal commentators from the left are -- sharp contract alert -- much more likely to be egregiously, repeatedly and loudly wrong in their 'analysis.' And not just on questions concerning the criminal liability of former President Donald Trump, but again…[more]
 
 
— Hugh Hewitt, Constitutional Law Professor and Talk Radio Host
 
Liberty Poll   

If TikTok's data collection or manipulation under Chinese ownership is the grave danger that our government says it is (and it may well be), then wouldn't the prudent action be to ban it immediately rather than some time down the road?