In our latest Liberty Update, CFIF highlights the debut of the "Most Favored Patient" initiative, which…
CFIF on X CFIF on YouTube
Image of the Day: Drug Prices Are CHEAPER in the U.S. Than Other Developed Nations

In our latest Liberty Update, CFIF highlights the debut of the "Most Favored Patient" initiative, which offers the optimal blueprint going forward for lower drug costs, greater access and better healthcare.

Well, the policy heavyweights behind Most Favored Patient come from the group at Unleash Prosperity, including Steve Forbes, Stephen Moore, Phil Kerpen, and Thomas Philipson.  And in addition to their new work at Most Favored Patient, they've unveiled a new commentary explaining how drug prices in the U.S. are actually cheaper than in other developed nations with which we're often unfairly compared:

It IS true that Americans pay more for new drugs under patent. That, of course, is because American pharmaceutical companies spend billions of dollars inventing the major breakthrough…[more]

August 20, 2025 • 08:24 PM

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
The Medicare-for-All Hoax
By Betsy McCaughey
Wednesday, September 12 2018
President Barack Obama made a stunning policy shift on Friday, endorsing "Medicare-for-all" — a single-payer health system — for the nation. Most Democrats contending for the 2020 presidential nomination, and many Dems vying for Congressional seats this fall, are backing it, too. But beware. They're pulling a bait-and-switch. The phrase "Medicare-for-all" sounds as American as apple pie. A new Reuters poll shows 70 percent of Americans respond to it favorably. That's because the public isn't getting the truth about what it means. The actual plan these…
 
The Post-9/11 Cycle of Cynicism
Remember. Forget. Repeat. For 17 years, America has engaged in a collective ritual every Sept. 11: Hang…
Read more...
Lack of Ideological Diversity Eviscerates Colleges' Affirmative Action Rationalization
"The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race." …
Read more...
 
When a Foreign Adversary Meddled In a Presidential Election
In the 1990s, a hostile foreign power meddled in our presidential election. There were serious questions…
Read more...
Kavanaugh Confirmation Hearings Showcase the Paranoia of the Resistance
When cameras at Brett Kavanaugh's Supreme Court hearing caught sight of a woman named Zina Bash, a Republican…
Read more...
 
Conservative Judicial Activism Is Just As Objectionable as Liberal Judicial Activism
"Who says Roe must say Lochner."  So wrote Judge Robert H. Bork in The Tempting of America. …
Read more...
Failing CDC Lets Infants Die From Infection
Last week, the horrific facts behind baby Melanie Sanders' death finally came to light. Just 16 weeks…
Read more...
 
On Trump-Russia, Too Much Secrecy Keeps Public In Dark
National leaders of all stripes have complained for decades that Washington keeps too many secrets. Too…
Read more...
J.D. Martinez's 2nd Amendment Stance Isn't Controversial; It's Patriotic
Someone recently dug up an old pro-Second Amendment Instagram post by Boston Red Sox star J.D. Martinez…
Read more...
 
Google's Chickens Coming Home to Roost
Whoever at Google selected "Don't Be Evil" as its former corporate motto obviously possessed…
Read more...
The Left's Long War on Conservative Free Speech
In the competition of ideas, you can't win the game if you're not on the playing field. That's why Silicon…
Read more...
Notable Quote   
 
"A Democratic National Committee meeting on Tuesday devolved into an anti-Israel slugfest, leading its chairman, Ken Martin, to pull a resolution many party members believed was not harsh enough on the Jewish state. Instead, Martin invited the anti-Israel members to join a committee to reevaluate the party's position on Israel.The Martin-backed resolution, which the DNC initially approved, called…[more]
 
 
— Adam Kredo, Washington Free Beacon
 
Liberty Poll   

Apropos of Labor Day, do you believe that corporate CEOs are right to require employees to be in the office for a specified number of weekly days, in the interests of corporate direction, efficiency and output?