Inexplicably, the U.S. Senate this week narrowly moved to restore 2015 Obama Administration Federal…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
Image of the Day: What Obama FCC Internet Regulation Did to U.S. Broadband Investment

Inexplicably, the U.S. Senate this week narrowly moved to restore 2015 Obama Administration Federal Communications Commission (FCC) crony capitalist internet regulations.  Here's the effect that Obama FCC regulation immediately had on mobile broadband investment.  It's now the duty of the House of Representatives and the Trump Administration to kill this mindless Obama-era attempt to regulate the internet, and we encourage everyone to contact their Representatives and the White House to demand that action.

. [caption id="" align="alignleft" width="550" caption="Neutering the Net"][/caption]…[more]

May 18, 2018 • 12:09 pm

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's CourtroomLegal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts.
Taxaholic Governors Try to Dodge Federal Tax Law Print
By Betsy McCaughey
Wednesday, January 31 2018
[B]lue-state politicians are desperate to keep high earners from fleeing.

The governors of New York, Connecticut and New Jersey joined forces last week to announce they're suing Uncle Sam. They're trying to torpedo the new $10,000 ceiling on how much state and local taxes their residents can deduct when paying federal income taxes.

The three governors sounded like buffoons, making far-fetched claims that the $10,000 cap violates the U.S. Constitution. Nonsense. Their lawsuit is a public relations stunt to mislead high earners in their states that relief is on the way.

The truth is that, for years, being able to deduct state and local taxes numbed taxpayers and coddled taxaholic politicians. Now the jig is up.

In New York, the top 1 percent of earners provide 42 percent of the state's income tax revenue. These 1-percenters deducted $500,000 a year on average for state and local taxes. As of Jan. 1, their deduction is capped at $10,000, making it painfully expensive for them to continue living in New York.

Likewise, New Jersey's top 1 percent of earners provide 40 percent of that state's income tax revenue, If they leave, it's caput for New Jersey.

The governors are worried the richest 1 percent will flee to low-tax states. After all, New Yorkers bear the highest state and local tax burden in the nation. Connecticut and New Jersey are almost as bad. Seven statesincluding Florida and Texasdon't tax income at all. Why live in tax-hell if you can move to tax paradise?

No wonder the three governors are concocting claims the cap violates the Constitution's "equal protection" guarantee and the principles of federalism. Expect these claims to be thrown out of court in a nanosecond. Fox News legal analyst Andrew Napolitano predicts the states will even be ordered to pay Uncle Sam's court costs as punishment for their frivolous lawsuit.

New York's Governor Andrew Cuomo complains the new tax law, enacted by a Republican Congress, discriminates against high-tax states controlled by Democrats.

But tax provisions have always impacted states unevenly. Federal deductions for using solar panels benefit Hawaii, California and Arizona far more than Maine and Minnesota, where nearly half of homes can't use solar.

The 16th Amendment, empowering the federal government to tax income, clearly states the burden does not have to be apportioned among the states in any particular way.

As for deductions, Cuomo, New Jersey's Governor Phil Murphy and Connecticut's Governor Dannel Malloy would have you think deducting state and local taxes is a "right" under the Constitution. No way. The alternative minimum tax already eliminated these deductions for many filers without any constitutional problem.

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled deductions of all kinds are a "legislative grace," totally up to Congress.

Unlike the wealthiest 1 percent, most residents of New York, Connecticut and New Jersey are benefitting from the new federal tax law. The near doubling of the standard deduction, together with lower rates and other changes, more than offsets the cap for them. Only 34 percent of New York filers, and 40 percent of Connecticut and New Jersey filers items itemized before the new tax law, and even fewer will after.

But blue-state politicians are desperate to keep high earners from fleeing. California Democrats are even floating a scheme to deem certain state and local tax payments "charitable contributions" deductible for federal tax purposes. This farce is unlikely to fly with the IRS, which has ruled repeatedly that a payment is not a charitable contribution if the payer receives something of value in return.

On Jan. 16, Cuomo unveiled his proposed $168 billion state budgetroughly twice as large as Florida's, a state with two million more residents. Florida is hardly a backwater. New Yorkers should be asking why they have to pay twice as much for state services as Floridians do.

Instead of filing nonsense lawsuits and scheming to deceive the federal tax authorities, Cuomo and his fellow big-spending governors should get busy finding ways to slash the waste in their own state budgets.


Betsy McCaughey is a senior fellow at the London Center for Policy Research and a former lieutenant governor of New York State.
COPYRIGHT 2018 CREATORS.COM

Question of the Week   
During which one of the following conflicts was U.S. paper money first printed by the Department of the Treasury?
More Questions
Quote of the Day   
 
"The blue wave that Democrats are counting on to win the day in November, and the Congress with it, just can't seem to break out of the swamp. This week's party primaries were counted on to produce candidates moderate enough, or at least sane enough, to restore credibility to Democratic prospects. It didn't happen quite that way.'Tuesday,' observes The Washington Post, the house organ of the party…[more]
 
 
—The Editors, The Washington Times
— The Editors, The Washington Times
 
Liberty Poll   

Do you believe media reporting that President Trump called immigrants "animals," without checking his full statement clearly referring specifically to "MS-13 gang members," was intentional or unintentional?