There's good news to begin the week from the public opinion front. Despite - or perhaps because of…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
New Poll: Americans Oppose Obama-Iran Accord By Over 2-to-1

There's good news to begin the week from the public opinion front.

Despite - or perhaps because of - the Obama Administration's desperate effort to sell a skeptical Congress and American electorate on its dangerous nuclear accord with Iran, a new Quinnipiac poll shows that the public opposes the deal by more than a two-to-one margin:

American voters oppose 57-28 percent, with only lukewarm support from Democrats and overwhelming opposition from Republicans and independent voters, the nuclear pact negotiated with Iran, according to a Quinnipiac University national poll released today.  Voters say 58-30 percent the nuclear pact will make the world less safe, the independent Quinnipiac University poll finds."

That skepticism is matched by some in Congress, including Senator Tom Cotton (…[more]

August 03, 2015 • 09:58 am

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's CourtroomLegal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts.
Obama Has Earned World’s Contempt Print
By Quin Hillyer
Thursday, September 13 2012
Obama may have, quite bizarrely, already won the Nobel Peace Prize – but the truth is that American nobility now lies in pieces on the ground.

Nobody should even for a moment entertain the suggestion that the attacks on American outposts in Libya and Egypt are the fault of Barack Obama – but nobody should avoid saying that this week’s tragedies are symptomatic of the abject failure of Obama’s foreign policies not just in northern Africa but around the globe.

Under Obama’s reign of error, the United States’ most important and traditional alliances are frayed, our iffy relationships have not improved and our adversaries are no less adversarial. Worse, all three groups seem to respect us less, and those evil regimes that once feared us now seem to hold us nearly in contempt.

Never in my lifetime have relations with Israel been worse – perhaps not surprising, as it seems to reflect a deeply anti-Israeli worldview from Obama himself, who hails from the milieu of Rashid Khalidi and Khalid Al Masour. But in the midst of a gathering crisis in Iran, this arrogant man in the Oval Office refuses to meet with an Israeli Prime Minister while still making time for frivolous appearances like one with David Letterman. This is the height (or, rather, depth) of asininity, especially for the only president in memory to fail to visit Israel for an entire term.

Never in my lifetime has the United States been less associated in foreign minds with human rights – not after Obama watched impassively as Iran murdered its citizens in the streets, as Syria does the same and as Moammar Ghadafi did for weeks in Libya itself until Obama finally decided whose side he was on.

Obama also repeatedly has failed to stand up for religious liberty around the world, especially for Christian Copts. (The one exception is that Obama always goes out of his way to kowtow to Islam, even going so far as to make Islamic suck-up a prime mission for NASA. Not that it has done him or us any good, as this week’s events demonstrate.)

Traditionally, of course, liberal human rights advocates posit an opposition between human rights and American military strength (although Ronald Reagan merged the two very well, thank you very much), but Obama has pulled off the neat feat of downgrading human rights and American might at the same time. Our military is being gutted. Our mission in Afghanistan is ill-defined and increasingly confused. We left Iraq ignominiously before reaching agreement with the Iraqi government on policing issues – and now Iraq is hurdling towards either civil unrest or horrid repression.

Russia and China repeatedly snub their noses at us, as if our objections to their behavior are utterly inconsequential. Latin American radicals like Ecuador’s Correa and Venezuela’s Chavez still spew anti-American hate, despite all of Obama’s hapless “outreach” to the supposedly dispossessed of the world. And, of course, the “Arab Spring” sure as heck isn’t flowing the way the Muslim-friendly Obama wanted, as is evident in the embassy attacks this week. Even as he bows and kisses their rings, they still show contempt for everything American.

Meanwhile, our allies are left bereft. Obama has treated Poland incredibly shabbily; he effectively insulted Great Britain by returning Churchill’s bust and insulted the queen by “gifting” her with a mere iPod of his own (!!!) speeches. Eastern Europe as a whole begs for our friendship, but gets the back of Obama’s hand. Even Mexico feels slighted, as indicated by a scathing statement from the Mexican ambassador with regard to the Obama-Holder Fast and Furious gun-running scandal.

All of which begs the question: Where, pray tell, are American interests better off than they were four years ago?

It would be a huge challenge for any serious observer to name a single significant country or area of the globe where the United States is now stronger than before Obama began Occupying the Oval Office. Yet, as detailed above, many places exist where American interests are now much weaker.

Obama may have, quite bizarrely, already won the Nobel Peace Prize – but the truth is that American nobility now lies in pieces on the ground. His self-referential monuments of words lie in decrepitude; he has become Obamandias, his sneer of cold command looking over ruins.

In sum, Obama’s apology tour has achieved nothing for the United States but disdain. Next stop: Jimmy Carterville.

Question of the Week   
Which one of the following Obama Administration officials stated in April 2015 that under the nuclear deal with Iran, “you will have anywhere, any time 24/7 access as it relates to the nuclear facilities that Iran has”?
More Questions
Quote of the Day   
 
"On the eve of the first Republican primary debate, state party leaders across the nation say the 2016 contest is in a state of flux, as unpredictable and wide-open as any they can remember. A sprawling field of contenders, no clear frontrunner, still-unsettled primary election dates and rules, the combustible presence of Donald Trump -- all of it has top GOP officials scratching their heads over…[more]
 
 
—Katie Glueck, Kyle Cheney and Eli Stokols, POLITICO
— Katie Glueck, Kyle Cheney and Eli Stokols, POLITICO
 
Liberty Poll   

On August 6, Fox News will televise two debates with the Republican presidential candidates, at 9 p.m. with the top 10, and at 5 p.m. with the rest of the field. Do you plan on watching one or both?