CFIF often highlights how the Biden Administration's bizarre decision to resurrect failed Title II "…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
Image of the Day: U.S. Internet Speeds Skyrocketed After Ending Failed Title II "Net Neutrality" Experiment

CFIF often highlights how the Biden Administration's bizarre decision to resurrect failed Title II "Net Neutrality" internet regulation, which caused private broadband investment to decline for the first time ever outside of a recession during its brief experiment at the end of the Obama Administration, is a terrible idea that will only punish consumers if allowed to take effect.

Here's what happened after that brief experiment was repealed under the Trump Administration and Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chairman Ajit Pai - internet speeds skyrocketed despite late-night comedians' and left-wing activists' warnings that the internet was doomed:

[caption id="" align="aligncenter" width="515"] Internet Speeds Post-"Net Neutrality"[/caption]

 …[more]

April 19, 2024 • 09:51 AM

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
CFIF to FCC: Latest Proposed 'Net Neutrality' Rule Fails as a Matter of Objective Market Realities and Violates First Amendment
By CFIF Staff
Thursday, December 14 2023
The Center for Individual Freedom (CFIF) today submitted the following Comment in opposition to the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) Proposed Rule entitled “Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet."  CFIF argues that the proposed rule fails as a matter of objective market realities, violates the U.S. Supreme Court’s "Major Questions" Doctrine, and violates the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Read CFIF full comment below or here (PDF).  ###  
 
Biden Administration Thuggishly Seeks “March In” Power to Seize Private Drug Patents
"Nice invention you’ve got there.  Be a shame if someone marched in and seized it from…
Read more...
Congress Will Need a New Idea in 2024. Will It Choose a Good One?
With U.S. government revenues rising, 2023 might have been a good year to get America's post-COVID-19…
Read more...
 
Give Us Educated, Skilled Immigrants Yearning to Support Themselves
When Emma Lazarus wrote her famous line in 1883, "Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses…
Read more...
As Trump Lead Widens, Prosecutors Step Up Pursuit
Two things are true: One, former President Donald Trump's polling – nationally, in key…
Read more...
 
Why Does Washington Want to Destroy America's 'Magnificent 7'?
Nothing exemplifies America's tech industry dominance in the global economy more than the meteoric rise…
Read more...
A Short History of Joe's Long Record of Lying About Biden Inc.
After being asked the other day why he's interacted with "so many" foreign associates of his…
Read more...
 
Supreme Court Scrutinizes Yet Another Federal Regulatory Abuse
“Judge, jury and executioner.”   That familiar, ominous idiom instantly signals…
Read more...
Liz Cheney for President?
Why would former Rep. Liz Cheney run for president? Is she nuts? Is she trying to sell a book? Why would…
Read more...
 
Green Groups Are No Longer Promoting a Cleaner Environment
The late, great humorist P.J. O'Rourke used to quip that everyone wants to save the world, but no one…
Read more...
Team Biden's Double Quarter Pounder 'Misinformation' Campaign
On Sept. 20, Politico published an article headlined, "Biden campaign set to counterpunch on misinformation."…
Read more...
Notable Quote   
 
"As federal Department of Education and congressional investigators gear up to probe the climate of antisemitism at Columbia University and other colleges across the country, they might want to start by looking into the professors and administrators who fund antisemites.They're easy to find. Just look up donors to antisemitic Reps. Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) and Ilhan Omar (D-MN) who list their employer…[more]
 
 
— David Mastio, Former USA Today Editor and Regional Editor for The Center Square
 
Liberty Poll   

If TikTok's data collection or manipulation under Chinese ownership is the grave danger that our government says it is (and it may well be), then wouldn't the prudent action be to ban it immediately rather than some time down the road?