CFIF often highlights how the Biden Administration's bizarre decision to resurrect failed Title II "…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
Image of the Day: U.S. Internet Speeds Skyrocketed After Ending Failed Title II "Net Neutrality" Experiment

CFIF often highlights how the Biden Administration's bizarre decision to resurrect failed Title II "Net Neutrality" internet regulation, which caused private broadband investment to decline for the first time ever outside of a recession during its brief experiment at the end of the Obama Administration, is a terrible idea that will only punish consumers if allowed to take effect.

Here's what happened after that brief experiment was repealed under the Trump Administration and Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chairman Ajit Pai - internet speeds skyrocketed despite late-night comedians' and left-wing activists' warnings that the internet was doomed:

[caption id="" align="aligncenter" width="515"] Internet Speeds Post-"Net Neutrality"[/caption]

 …[more]

April 19, 2024 • 09:51 AM

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Biden's Banking Busts
By Betsy McCaughey
Wednesday, March 15 2023
The failure of three banks in the last two weeks, including Silicon Valley Bank on Friday and Signature Bank on Sunday, is a saga of utter government incompetence. Call these bank collapses Biden's Banking Busts. The Biden administration has been obsessing on woke causes while banks teeter toward insolvency. Three days before Silicon Valley Bank collapsed, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen cautioned that climate change puts the banking industry at risk. Yellen was in la-la land, speculating that future storms and tornadoes could diminish the value of banks' assets. Weather is a risk, but she was…
 
Joe Biden and Democrats' Chronic Crime Problem
What's one good clue that President Joe Biden really intends to run for reelection in 2024? He is trying…
Read more...
Death Taxes Are Immoral. Even Worse, They Don't Work.
"I have no respect for the passion of equality," Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., one of America's…
Read more...
 
CFIF Launches New Ads Calling for Full Repeal of Tennessee’s Certificate-of-Need Laws
“Lost Hospitals, Lost Health Care Services, Lost Jobs…It’s Time to Fully Repeal the…
Read more...
CFIF Leads Coalition Comment Opposing FTC’s Proposed Ban of Noncompete Agreements in Employment
In a formal comment filed this week with the Federal Trade Commission ("FTC"), more than a…
Read more...
 
Biden Drug Price Controls Threaten Alzheimer’s Breakthroughs
For years, we’ve hoped in vain for Alzheimer’s disease treatments that improve survival rates…
Read more...
The Price of Eliminating Consequences
Recently there were some remarkable online videos of a Portland, Oregon good Samaritan confronting shoplifters…
Read more...
 
The Peter (Buttigieg) Principle
In the 1960s, there was a professor and business analyst named Lawrence J. Peter. He became famous for…
Read more...
America's $100 Billion Climate Change Flop
For at least the last 20 years, politicians in Washington, at the behest of green energy groups, have…
Read more...
 
Questioning Biden's Ukraine Policy Doesn't Make You an 'Isolationist'
It's not exactly a sign of a healthy democratic discourse that it's virtually impossible to ask a critical…
Read more...
The American Way Versus the Politicians' Way
Let's call it the "Biden way": When our president can't get his policies through Congress,…
Read more...
Notable Quote   
 
"Conservative legal commentators are usually very cautious whether on cable or radio broadcasts or in-print for some obvious reasons detailed below. Legal commentators from the left are -- sharp contract alert -- much more likely to be egregiously, repeatedly and loudly wrong in their 'analysis.' And not just on questions concerning the criminal liability of former President Donald Trump, but again…[more]
 
 
— Hugh Hewitt, Constitutional Law Professor and Talk Radio Host
 
Liberty Poll   

If TikTok's data collection or manipulation under Chinese ownership is the grave danger that our government says it is (and it may well be), then wouldn't the prudent action be to ban it immediately rather than some time down the road?