We've recently highlighted how right-to-work states, which the Biden Administration and Congressional…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
Amazon Workers Soundly Reject Unionization, and NR's Kevin Williamson Highlights Another Great Reason Why: Big-Labor Corruption

We've recently highlighted how right-to-work states, which the Biden Administration and Congressional leftists hope to abolish, dramatically outperform forced-union states in terms of job growth, manufacturing and household consumption.  Worker freedom from Big Labor bosses is a leading reason why in a high-profile vote, Amazon workers in Alabama voted to reject unionization by a 71% to 29% margin last week.

In a phenomenal new piece, National Review's Kevin Williamson offers another reason for rejecting unionization that we mustn't ignore:  big labor bosses' widespread corruption.  Williamson lists a litany of union officials convicted and sentenced for embezzlement and other misuse of members' hard-earned dues - in 2020 alone.  Accordingly, the leftist anti-capitalist drumbeat…[more]

April 12, 2021 • 01:05 PM

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's CourtroomLegal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts.
Help Wanted: How You, Too, Can Profit from Pork and Earmarks Print
By CFIF Staff
Tuesday, April 28 2009
You missed the banking, auto maker and insurance bailouts. You couldn’t get to Miami fast enough to be the thousandth person in line for the 30 firefighter jobs. You can’t wait several years for the jobs promised by the so-called “economic stimulus” package; you’re not sure what a “green job” is...

So you don’t have a job. Or maybe you do and just want a change.

You missed the banking, auto maker and insurance bailouts. You couldn’t get to Miami fast enough to be the thousandth person in line for the 30 firefighter jobs. You can’t wait several years for the jobs promised by the so-called “economic stimulus” package; you’re not sure what a “green job” is, and the last time you attempted to develop an “alternative energy resource” you had a firecracker mishap or were doing a Ben Franklin with lightning.

You undoubtedly regret not being elected to Congress. If you had just not paid your taxes, you’d still have a few dollars left and also be eligible for a cabinet position in the Obama administration.

Not to worry, though. The aforementioned Congress and Obama administration have jobs galore on the way. They’re just hidden and/or mislabeled in a $410 billion omnibus appropriations bill that could be voted on at any minute. That’s real money and it’s going to be spent right now, this year.

The reason you don’t know so much about the jobs potential in the bill is that the nubbins who are trying to ram it through don’t want you to know and those conservatives who are trying to stop it have been only calling it “pork,” riddled with “earmarks.” Well, it is pork and it does have 8,570 earmarks in it, and it does represent, according to an analysis by Senator Tom Coburn, “the largest increase in annual discretionary spending since the Carter Administration.”

But the bill is ever so much more than that. It is chockablock full of jobs that represent the sweep, swoop and economic diversity of this great innovative country, or, at least, the demented innovative chicanery of your duly-elected federal officials.

Why, there’s $1.6 million to the Washington State Department of Ecology for “citizen-driven environmental protection.” Don’t you want to be Director of that? Never mind that the federal government is paying for something that Washington State should pay for, if its citizens want it, or why it should cost taxpayer money for a “citizen-driven” project.

By now, too many people have probably learned of the $1.79 million project for Swine Odor and Manure Management for jobs to be still available there. Or, all things considered, maybe not. Try it anyway.

If you love the great outdoors, you’d better hurry, because there’s only $254,000 for the Montana Sheep Institute and $475,000 for the Bald Eagle Observatory in Alaska.

You could do termite research in Louisiana ($6.623 million), rodent control in Hawaii ($162,000) or weed management in Nevada ($235,000) or grape genetics in New York ($2.192 million) or dietary supplements research in Mississippi ($1.6 million).

Recognizing how much Americans love to fish, there are more grants for virtually every kind of fish, shellfish and other creatures that live under water than you can imagine. You could do Bluefin Tuna Tagging in California ($250,000), or fish management in Mobile, Alabama ($900,000) or Hawaiian sea turtle conservation ($7.1 million) and all that’s before you get to oysters, blue crabs, lobsters and the magnificent Lahontan cutthroat trout.

Obviously, when dealing with 8,570 earmarks in one bill alone, we cannot possibly cover all of the job opportunities hidden deeply within; you’re going to have to do something for yourselves.

We also must caution job seekers that the primary purpose of pork and earmarks is to reward supporters and special pleaders, so most of the jobs, whether they be in “Future Foods” or the “Iowa Vitality Center” or the “National Council of La Raza” are undoubtedly already committed. In addition, in the world of political patronage, it is not unknown for job holders to find it necessary to make certain “tributes.”

In the criminal world, such arrangements would be called “kickbacks.” But in the world of doing ever so much good for your country, you might think of them as an extension of your “patriotism.” Surely it cannot be patriotic to oppose a bill for which so many have labored so hard to think up such creative ways to spend taxpayer money. Can it?

Quiz Question   
In which century were the first mandatory vaccination laws enacted in the United States?
More Questions
Notable Quote   
 
"Democrats may well follow through on threats to add four new Justices to the Supreme Court -- though they have only three seats to spare in the House and a 50-50 tie in the Senate broken by Vice President Kamala Harris. But when Republicans inevitably retake the presidency and Congress they will retaliate by increasing the Supreme Court by another four or five Justices. Soon the Court will become…[more]
 
 
—John Yoo, University of California Professor of Law, Hoover Institution Visiting Fellow and AEI Visiting Scholar
— John Yoo, University of California Professor of Law, Hoover Institution Visiting Fellow and AEI Visiting Scholar
 
Liberty Poll   

Do you believe Democrats are serious about expanding the Supreme Court from 9 justices (since 1869) to 13 or are they just throwing rhetorical red meat to their base?