In last week's Liberty Update, we highlighted the Heritage Foundation's 2022 Index of Economic Freedom…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
Image of the Day: More Economic Freedom = Higher Standard of Living

In last week's Liberty Update, we highlighted the Heritage Foundation's 2022 Index of Economic Freedom, which shows that Joe Biden has dragged the U.S. down to 22nd, our lowest rank ever (we placed 4th in the first Index in 1995, and climbed back up from 18th to 12th under President Trump).  As we noted, among the Index's invaluable metrics is how it demonstrates the objective correlation between more economic freedom and higher citizen standards of living, which this graphic illustrates:

 …[more]

May 19, 2022 • 12:53 PM

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Warren Buffett Abandons Obama Print
By Timothy H. Lee
Thursday, August 28 2014
Since 2000, Canada has reduced its national corporate tax rate from 28% to 15%.

Agitated by the predictable consequences of their tax and regulatory agenda, liberals and the Obama Administration condemn the "economic patriotism" of "corporate deserters" who seek refuge by relocating operations beyond U.S. borders. 

This week, Burger King became just the latest target of their misplaced wrath, after announcing its acquisition of Canadian restaurateur Tim Hortons Inc. and that it will move its corporate headquarters to that lower-tax locale.  Senator Sherrod Brown (D - Ohio) went so far as to advocate a consumer boycott. 

One problem:  Burger King is actually owned by 3G Capital Management, a Brazilian private-equity firm.  Accordingly, if the Obama Administration or Senator Brown were taken at their word, "economic patriotism" would result in Burger King moving its operations south to Sao Paulo or Rio de Janeiro, not remaining in the U.S. 

Another amusing aspect to this kerfuffle is that Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway Inc. will help finance the transaction. 

This is the same Warren Buffett who hypocritically and on false pretenses advocated higher taxes during the 2012 election campaign.  It was hypocritical because nothing stopped him from paying the 30% "Buffett Rule" for millionaires and billionaires he claimed to support, rather than the 17.4% rate he actually paid.  He also notoriously battled the IRS over disputed taxes in 2010 after the sale of a subsidiary.  As hedge fund partner and Buffett biographer Jeff Matthews summarized for The Wall Street Journal, "The gap between what he says about taxes for everyone else and what he does for himself and Berkshire has always loomed large." 

And as Heritage Foundation economist Stephen Moore pointed out at the time, Buffett was also factually incorrect in his assertions: 

“According to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), middle-class families in 2007 (earning between $34,000 and $50,000) paid an effective 14.3% of their income in all federal taxes.  The top 5% of income earners paid 27.9% and the top 1% paid 29.5%.  And what about the highest earners?  Americans with annual incomes above $2 million paid an average of 32% of their income in federal taxes (the most recent year for which data are available).”

Those amusing angles aside, there's actually a very good reason that Canada was the chosen destination for corporate operations. 

The accounting firm KPMG recently released a comprehensive report entitled "Competitive Alternatives," which compared the tax competitiveness of ten of the world's largest and most advanced economies.  The report considered the array of taxes imposed on corporations, including income taxes, sales taxes, labor tax costs, property taxes, capital taxes and other forms.  Standing atop the list?  Proving once again that its reputation as some sort of socialist paradise is increasingly false, Canada: 

"Among the countries studied, Canada has the lowest Total Tax Index (TTI) at 53.6.  In other words, total tax costs in Canada are 46.4 percent lower than in the United States, which has a TTI of 100.0 and represents the benchmark against which all locations are scored." 

It should therefore come as little surprise to Senator Brown or the Obama Administration that Burger King would reach the decision it did.  Since 2000, Canada has reduced its national corporate tax rate from 28% to 15%.  And affirming the wisdom of that decision, Burger King shares rose nearly 20% following the announcement, while Tim Hortons shares increased 19%. 

Rather than maligning Burger King or supposed "corporate deserters," Senator Orrin Hatch (R - Utah) correctly observed that the real problem is America's outdated, uncompetitive and complex corporate tax code.  "Burger King's pursuit of an inversion," Hatch said, "only further underscores the arcane, anticompetitive nature of the U.S. tax code."  Specifically, our 40% combined federal and state corporate tax rate is the highest in the developed world.  Making matters worse, the U.S. is unique among advanced economies in taxing income earned overseas at the U.S. rate in addition to the local rate already paid in the nations where the income was actually earned. 

Meanwhile, the Obama Administration has suggested that it may once again take unilateral executive action to erect a metaphorical Berlin Wall preventing companies from fleeing our suffocating corporate taxes and federal overregulation.  That maneuver, and stubbornly refusing to work with Congress to reduce America's increasingly uncompetitive tax code, is far more "unpatriotic" than businesses relocating elsewhere in order to survive. 

When foreign businesses like Toyota opt to locate manufacturing or other operations in America rather than their own home countries, we justifiably celebrate them.  Yet when domestic companies respond to irrational and punitive U.S. tax and regulatory burdens by relocating, they are demonized. 

Here's the optimal course:  Reform our corporate tax code, lower rates and broaden the base.  By doing so, we can finally put this entire problem and unnecessary debate to rest, and persuade companies like Burger King to remain right here at home. 

Quiz Question   
How many days does it take the average U.S. household to consume as much electrical power as one single bitcoin transaction?
More Questions
Notable Quote   
 
"The trial of former Clinton campaign attorney Michael Sussmann crossed a critical threshold Friday when a key witness uttered the name 'Hillary Clinton' in conjunction with a plan to spread the false Alfa Bank Russian collusion claim before the 2016 presidential election.For Democrats and many in the media, Hillary Clinton has long held a Voldemort-like status as 'She who must not be named' in scandals…[more]
 
 
—Jonathan Turley, Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University
— Jonathan Turley, Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University
 
Liberty Poll   

Should any U.S. government agency have a function called the "Disinformation Governance Board" (See Homeland Security, Department of)?