We've recently highlighted how right-to-work states, which the Biden Administration and Congressional…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
Amazon Workers Soundly Reject Unionization, and NR's Kevin Williamson Highlights Another Great Reason Why: Big-Labor Corruption

We've recently highlighted how right-to-work states, which the Biden Administration and Congressional leftists hope to abolish, dramatically outperform forced-union states in terms of job growth, manufacturing and household consumption.  Worker freedom from Big Labor bosses is a leading reason why in a high-profile vote, Amazon workers in Alabama voted to reject unionization by a 71% to 29% margin last week.

In a phenomenal new piece, National Review's Kevin Williamson offers another reason for rejecting unionization that we mustn't ignore:  big labor bosses' widespread corruption.  Williamson lists a litany of union officials convicted and sentenced for embezzlement and other misuse of members' hard-earned dues - in 2020 alone.  Accordingly, the leftist anti-capitalist drumbeat…[more]

April 12, 2021 • 01:05 PM

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's CourtroomLegal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts.
If at First You Don’t Succeed, Spend and Spend Some More Print
By Sam Batkins
Wednesday, July 15 2009
Laura Tyson, an adviser to Obama, said the first $787 billion stimulus might have been “a bit too small.”

Potomac Fever:  some would define it as a determination to share in the power and prestige of the federal government.  Others might characterize it with words like obstinance, incorrigibility and simple pig-headedness. 

Undoubtedly, Washington loves power.  But when it comes to admitting the error of its ways, ignorance is bliss in the nation’s capital.

For example, recent rumblings have indicated that some members of President Obama’s economic team might be pushing for yet another taxpayer-funded stimulus package.  That’s right.

Laura Tyson, an adviser to Obama, said the first $787 billion stimulus might have been “a bit too small.”  Speculation of another spending binge was further advanced when Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) said he wouldn’t “rule out” another stimulus.

If taxpayers count the stimulus plan hatched with President Bush and Congressional leaders a year ago, another stimulus would mark Washington’s third attempt to “fix” the U.S. economy.  Politicians better put down their tools, because their current scheme is only making the economy worse.

Thus far, Washington spent $168 billion during President Bush’s attempt at top-down economic policy; President Obama pushed through another $787 billion stimulus this year, and now there is talk of yet more federal spending. 

If at first you don’t succeed, continue to spend money and act like you know what you’re doing.  If that fails, blame everything on your predecessor.  That appears to be Washington’s current M.O., as soaring unemployment, 9.4 percent and rising, continues to baffle the central planners.

The good news for taxpayers is that there appears to be little political will for another round of multi-billion dollar stimulus packages.  Senate Majority leader Harry Reid said, “There’s no showing that a second stimulus is needed.”  Senator Claire McCaskill was ever more direct in her assessment of a third stimulus, calling it a “non-starter.”

Most economists agree that another round of borrow-and-spend would be a disaster.  According to a recent Wall Street Journal survey, only eight out of fifty-one economists believe a third stimulus is needed.  A large percentage think another massive stimulus would actually hurt the economy.   

Indeed, Washington may not have enough time to spend the money already thrown against the wall with hopes of taking credit for an economic recovery that is yet to come.  Our elected leaders, rather, are too busy crafting other federal projects and attempting to find ways to pay for them. 

In addition to all of the spending of taxpayer dollars thus far, the Obama Administration this year wants to pass a new energy bill, known as the cap-and-trade energy tax, effectively seizing all power over carbon output in the U.S.  By the Fall, Congress is set to pass a massive new government-run health care system (if you thought the long gas lines in the 1970s were bad, imagine similar rationing of your family’s health care) estimated to cost between $1 trillion and $2 trillion over the next decade.

Of course, what the politicians in Washington aren’t telling you and what Obama didn’t mention during the campaign is that they’re going to have to raise taxes to European-like levels to pay for their Great Society, Part II.

Recently, an idea was floated to push personal income tax rates above 51 percent, higher than even France (46 percent), Germany (48 percent) and Italy (45 percent).  Even under Obama’s current budget forecasts, the top marginal rate is expected to rise from 35 percent to 39.6 percent by next year.

Combined with state and local income taxes and a proposed new 4 percent surtax, some taxpayers could be facing a tax bill of well over 50 percent of their income.   What’s worse, the idea of a value-added tax is still circulating on Capitol Hill.

In sum, it appears that when the gritty shell of arrogance cracks on some politicians, admitting failure is far too difficult.  Instead, they simply double-down and seek to dig their political graves even deeper.  Taxpayers can only hope that Washington stops digging soon before we’re all buried under the bad economic policy being expanded upon in Washington. 

Quiz Question   
In which century were the first mandatory vaccination laws enacted in the United States?
More Questions
Notable Quote   
"Democrats may well follow through on threats to add four new Justices to the Supreme Court -- though they have only three seats to spare in the House and a 50-50 tie in the Senate broken by Vice President Kamala Harris. But when Republicans inevitably retake the presidency and Congress they will retaliate by increasing the Supreme Court by another four or five Justices. Soon the Court will become…[more]
—John Yoo, University of California Professor of Law, Hoover Institution Visiting Fellow and AEI Visiting Scholar
— John Yoo, University of California Professor of Law, Hoover Institution Visiting Fellow and AEI Visiting Scholar
Liberty Poll   

Do you believe Democrats are serious about expanding the Supreme Court from 9 justices (since 1869) to 13 or are they just throwing rhetorical red meat to their base?