In this week's Liberty Update we highlight the potentially catastrophic threat of H.R. 3, the healthcare…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
Quote of the Day: WSJ on H.R. 3, Biden & Pelosi's Dangerous Healthcare Bill

In this week's Liberty Update we highlight the potentially catastrophic threat of H.R. 3, the healthcare and drug price control bill that Joe Biden and Nancy Pelosi are attempting to rush through Congress.  The Wall Street Journal helpfully offers further insight this morning on how H.R. 3 would threaten lifesaving U.S. pharmaceutical innovation and leadership, including on things like the Covid vaccines:

 

Companies that refuse the government’s price must pay a 95% excise tax on all revenue they generate from that drug in the U.S.  They’d also have to offer the government price to private insurers.  There’s no “negotiation” when a gun is pointed at your head.  A new study in the Journal of the American Medical Association estimates that drug spending in the U.S…[more]

September 17, 2021 • 12:55 PM

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Transparently Corrupt: Links between Obama’s Campaign Donors, Stimulus, and Energy Loans Print
By Ashton Ellis
Wednesday, April 18 2012
Simply put, without the massive amount of money being spent from the Recovery Act, bundlers-turned-government-cronies would have been unable to funnel billions of dollars to friends and colleagues.

Multiple independent investigations into the Obama Energy Department’s failed loan program reveal a pattern of corruption involving 2008 campaign bundlers, stimulus funds and sweetheart loan deals.  The reports confirm the suspicion that Solyndra’s $535 million boondoggle was only the tip of the iceberg. 

The Role of Bundlers

In an extensive report last summer, iWatch News – the investigative reporting unit of The Center for Public Integrity – analyzed campaign contributions attributed to Barack Obama’s biggest fundraisers and found a close correlation between the amount of money raised and reward received. 

Of the fundraisers considered “bundlers” – people who help campaigns skirt the $2,500 individual donation limit in federal elections by pooling money – 184 of 556, or nearly one-third, of them or their spouses joined the Obama administration in some capacity.  Half of Obama’s ambassador corps raised $500,000 or more.  Social perks for bundlers translated into more than 3,000 meetings or visits at the White House. 

Appointing fundraisers to political positions isn’t new.  What makes Obama’s bundlers unique is the hand many of them played in channeling federal tax dollars to their personal investments.   

According to the iWatch report, at least 19 Obama bundlers “have ties to businesses poised to profit from the president’s political agenda, through stimulus money, government contracts, or other spending to promote clean energy technology or green development.”     

Energy Loans to Losers

So far, the most famous example of an Obama campaign donor cashing-in on green energy money is Solyndra investor George Kaiser.  Kaiser, a billionaire, raised at least $50,000 for Obama’s 2008 campaign.  In March 2009, Kaiser’s investments in Solyndra paid off handsomely when the Department of Energy extended the company a $535 million loan to build a new facility in Fremont, CA. 

Three years later, Solyndra is bankrupt, but Kaiser is sitting pretty.  In subsequent negotiations, the Energy Department agreed to let private investors like Kaiser jump ahead of taxpayers in the creditor line if Solyndra went belly-up.  With the company insolvent, a creditor’s ability to recoup his losses depends on how many others must be compensated before him. 

In an interview discussing his book Throw Them All Out, author Peter Schweizer explains that of the $20 billion in green technology loans handed out by the Energy Department, $16 billion can be traced to Obama-related companies.  By this Schweizer means companies invested in or directed by Obama campaign bundlers or people who served on his 2008 campaign finance committee. 

Four of those took high-ranking jobs at the Energy Department.  Combined total raised: $1.6 million. 

Of the 27 green tech companies invested in by Al Gore and his business partner –and Obama bundler – John Doerr, 16 received Energy Department loans.  As Schweizer notes, the Gore-Doerr 59 percent success rate was well above the 10 percent approval rate among all applicants to the loan program. 

More Solyndras are on the way. 

Last week, thermal solar company BrightSource canceled its Initial Public Offering due to lack of interest from the market, but only after it received $1.6 billion in Energy Department loans. 

In Obamaland, taxpayer money chasing bad investments has only one explanation.

Recently, The Washington Free Beacon reported that “the largest investor in BrightSource (with a 25 percent stake) is VantagePoint Venture Partners, a firm whose principal, Sanjay Wagle, helped raise millions for President Obama’s campaign in 2008 and even served as a ‘renewable energy grants advisor’ at the DOE.” 

Stimulating Liberal Causes

Defenders of the Obama administration’s largesse with other people’s money note that the Energy Department’s green technology loan program began in the latter half of George W. Bush’s administration, so why haven’t we seen reports of corruption and abuse from that era? 

Two words: stimulus spending. 

When the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 and its $787 billion were passed, it was with the intent to kick-start a nationwide economic rebound with massive government spending.  Anybody who claimed the ability to create jobs was considered for funding, but stimulus dollars were directed to supporters of liberal causes. 

Public employee unions took the lion’s share of money spent on “infrastructure” projects like road paving and teacher salaries, while politically connected companies cashed in on subsidies and loans to create the still unrealized dream of green jobs. 

Simply put, without the massive amount of money being spent from the Recovery Act, bundlers-turned-government-cronies would have been unable to funnel billions of dollars to friends and colleagues. 

When he entered office in 2009, President Obama promised Americans “the most transparent administration in history.”  Who knew it would be so costly? 

Quiz Question   
Based on FBI statistics, what is the approximate annual cost to U.S. victims of cyber-crime?
More Questions
Notable Quote   
 
"A generation ago, labor unions actually tried to represent the financial interests of workers. For all their other faults, they at least focused on higher wages, better working conditions, and tight labor markets for their members.That era is long gone. Now, labor unions' top issues include 'racial justice,' 'climate change,' and 'immigration reform.' This is one reason why the percentage of workers…[more]
 
 
—The Editors, Washington Examiner
— The Editors, Washington Examiner
 
Liberty Poll   

Of the presidents who have presided over the Afghanistan war, which one deserves the worst grade as the U.S. observes the 20th anniversary of 9-11?