In our Liberty Update this week, we highlight the latest illegal leak of thousands of supposedly confidential…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
ProPublica/IRS Leak: There's No Underlying "There" There

In our Liberty Update this week, we highlight the latest illegal leak of thousands of supposedly confidential Internal Revenue Service (IRS) taxpayer returns spanning over 15 years, confirming that the partisan and power-hungry IRS simply cannot be trusted to safeguard our sensitive records, let alone to begin collecting sensitive private information from nonprofit organizations on donors who contribute to them in violation of the First Amendment.

Getting to the substance of the ProPublica/IRS leaked documents themselves, former Senator Phil Gramm and U.S. Policy Metrics partner Mike Solon explain in The Wall Street Journal how there's nothing scandalous in the least in what they reveal:

ProPublica’s 'blockbuster' story showing that the wealthy 'pay income taxes that are only…[more]

June 18, 2021 • 04:40 PM

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Why the Inconsistencies in Coronavirus Rules? Print
By Byron York
Wednesday, June 17 2020
Is it any wonder that many have no faith at all in the wisdom, fairness and effectiveness of the authorities' efforts to control coronavirus?

As the country struggles to vanquish coronavirus, Americans are witnessing a bizarre phenomenon in which some authorities tolerate and even praise highly politicized mass gatherings while at the same time suppress small activities  like taking children to a playground  that are important to quality of life.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says that when it comes to public gatherings, the "highest risk" for coronavirus transmission occurs during "large in-person gatherings where it is difficult for individuals to remain spaced at least 6 feet apart and attendees travel from outside the local area."

In New York on Monday, Gov. Andrew Cuomo issued a new directive that slightly  very slightly  reduced restrictions on gatherings. "Gatherings of up to 25 people will be allowed in Phase Three of reopening, up from the limit of 10," the governor's office announced.

But on Sunday, the day before Cuomo's announcement, thousands of people packed into a plaza by the Brooklyn Museum for something called "Brooklyn Liberation ... an action for black trans lives." Social distancing was not observed. And while many were wearing masks, the state's policy does not have a mask exception to its guidelines against mass gatherings.

According to the latest statistics, Brooklyn has 59,832 cases of coronavirus, more than 39 states. It has had 6,936 deaths, more than 47 states.

There was no police effort to disperse the crowd.

Here's what seemed particularly crazy. Not long after the massive "Brooklyn Liberation" event, not too far away in Williamsburg, city workers welded shut a playground to keep children from playing.

"City playgrounds have been closed by state order since April 1," The New York Post reported, "when Gov. Cuomo took the option out of the hands of Mayor Bill de Blasio as the pandemic ran rampant through New York. At the time, the governor's office said they took the step to prevent the gathering crowds where the virus, which has killed over 100,000 people in the U.S. over the past few months, could spread."

Residents saw it another way. "How long can we keep our kids in prison?" asked one mother, according to the Post.

It's understandable that people in New York City would be stir-crazy and anxious to resume normal life. Of course they are. But public officials are still trying to discourage that desire to open up. When a local news site published a photo of crowds drinking and socializing Friday night on St. Mark's Place in Manhattan's East Village, Cuomo censoriously tweeted, "Don't make me come down there ..."

Perhaps if they had been carrying protest signs.

Meanwhile, there were unmistakable signs that the city's much-touted contact tracing program has already become politicized. Experts hail contact tracing as a key weapon against further spread of coronavirus. But the New York news organization The City reported that "The hundreds of contact tracing workers hired by the city under de Blasio's new 'test and trace' campaign have been instructed not to ask anyone who's tested positive for COVID-19 whether they recently attended a demonstration."

"No person will be asked if they attended a protest," a spokesman for de Blasio told The City. So if one has been at a playground where a person who tested positive for the virus has been, the city wants to know about it. But if one has been at "Brooklyn Liberation," and there was someone among the thousands who tested positive, city officials do not want to hear it.

Is it any wonder that many have no faith at all in the wisdom, fairness and effectiveness of the authorities' efforts to control coronavirus?

There has been so much coronavirus-related criticism of gatherings around the country  on Florida beaches, on California beaches, at the Lake of the Ozarks  while there has been relatively less concern over other mass gatherings, like protests for social causes. What sense does that make?

Byron York is chief political correspondent for The Washington Examiner.

Quiz Question   
What was the highest year-over-year inflation rate since the consumer price index has been used to calculate it?
More Questions
Notable Quote   
"For the past year, liberals unleashed on the nation an avalanche of ideological nonsense, coupled with brutal pressure to conform. Those who bucked the party line found themselves canceled and unpersoned and had their opinions subjected to mockery and claims of delusion and 'anti-science' prejudices.Until now. Because the tide is turning. And sometimes the break from the party line comes from surprising…[more]
—Glenn Harlan Reynolds, Founder and Univ. of Tennessee Professor of Law
— Glenn Harlan Reynolds, Founder and Univ. of Tennessee Professor of Law
Liberty Poll   

Are your local schools currently facing open debate with parents regarding the introduction of radical leftist ideological positions into the curricula?