In our Liberty Update this week, we highlight the latest illegal leak of thousands of supposedly confidential…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
ProPublica/IRS Leak: There's No Underlying "There" There

In our Liberty Update this week, we highlight the latest illegal leak of thousands of supposedly confidential Internal Revenue Service (IRS) taxpayer returns spanning over 15 years, confirming that the partisan and power-hungry IRS simply cannot be trusted to safeguard our sensitive records, let alone to begin collecting sensitive private information from nonprofit organizations on donors who contribute to them in violation of the First Amendment.

Getting to the substance of the ProPublica/IRS leaked documents themselves, former Senator Phil Gramm and U.S. Policy Metrics partner Mike Solon explain in The Wall Street Journal how there's nothing scandalous in the least in what they reveal:

ProPublica’s 'blockbuster' story showing that the wealthy 'pay income taxes that are only…[more]

June 18, 2021 • 04:40 PM

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
As Election Nears, Another Battle Over Intelligence and Russia Print
By Byron York
Wednesday, September 02 2020
Democrats have been playing the Russia card for years now, first to try to prevent Trump's election, then to try to undermine Trump's presidency, then to try to end Trump's presidency – remember that Schiff was the leader of the House impeachment effort – and now to try to prevent Trump's reelection.

A new furor has erupted over Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe's decision to give some members of Congress written updates on foreign election interference instead of in-person briefings. In the past, some Hill Democrats have spun and leaked information from the old oral briefings, especially ones given to all members instead of just the intelligence committees. That has prompted Ratcliffe to seek to more carefully control what information is given to Congress in regular intelligence updates.

"I believe this approach helps ensure [that intelligence on] elections security, foreign malign influence and election interference is not misunderstood nor politicized," Ratcliffe wrote on Aug. 28. "It will also better protect our sources and methods and most sensitive intelligence from additional unauthorized disclosures or misuse."

The short version of Ratcliffe's message to lawmakers: You're distorting what we say and leaking anything you want, even if it is classified. We're going to make that harder to do.

Democrats and many in the media immediately went ballistic, in a way that has been seen many, many times before in the Trump presidency. "The director of national intelligence is providing cover for Putin," wrote the Washington Post editorial board. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Intelligence Committee chairman Adam Schiff called it a "shocking abdication of [DNI's] lawful responsibility to keep the Congress currently informed."

But what about Congress's lawful responsibility to protect classified information? Pelosi and Schiff had less to say about that. Insiders aren't surprised. "It's pretty clear that [the DNI] had evidence of Schiff and the Democrats leaking," said one Hill source. "It's been a constant problem. The last time was just the final straw."

That's a reference to late July, when top Democrats, worried about a possible Senate investigation into Joe Biden, Hunter Biden and business ties to Ukraine, asked for "a full congressional briefing before the August recess." They said they were "gravely concerned, in particular, that Congress appears to be the target of a concerted foreign interference campaign." When they got the briefing, the leaks quickly began, so much so that the intelligence community released a public statement to clarify what had been told to Congress  that China, Russia and Iran are all seeking to influence the results of the 2020 U.S. election. (China and Iran were said to prefer a Biden victory, while Russia prefers Trump.)

That was just one episode. House Intelligence Committee Democrats pulled basically the same thing in February, setting off a series of leaks about alleged Russian intentions that caught administration officials unawares.

Ratcliffe and other intelligence officials were appalled by the wholesale leaking. In an interview with Fox Business' Maria Bartiromo, Ratcliffe explained why he acted. "We're not going to do a repeat of what happened a month ago, when I did more than what was required, at the request of Congress, to brief not just the oversight committees, but every member of Congress," Ratcliffe said. "When I did that, I said my only condition is that you treat this information with the respect that it deserves, and you keep it private. And yet, within minutes of one of those briefings ending, a number of members of Congress went to a number of different publications and leaked classified information, again, for political purposes, to create a narrative that simply isn't true, that somehow Russia is a greater national security threat than China."

It's not a surprise that Ratcliffe finally took action. Democrats have been playing the Russia card for years now, first to try to prevent Trump's election, then to try to undermine Trump's presidency, then to try to end Trump's presidency remember that Schiff was the leader of the House impeachment effort  and now to try to prevent Trump's reelection. Of course Schiff, Pelosi and other top Democrats are ramping up their efforts in the final weeks before the election. And they are going back to the same old source  Russia, Russia, Russia. And that is what this latest intelligence fight is all about.


Byron York is chief political correspondent for The Washington Examiner.
COPYRIGHT 2020 BYRON YORK

Quiz Question   
What was the highest year-over-year inflation rate since the consumer price index has been used to calculate it?
More Questions
Notable Quote   
 
"For the past year, liberals unleashed on the nation an avalanche of ideological nonsense, coupled with brutal pressure to conform. Those who bucked the party line found themselves canceled and unpersoned and had their opinions subjected to mockery and claims of delusion and 'anti-science' prejudices.Until now. Because the tide is turning. And sometimes the break from the party line comes from surprising…[more]
 
 
—Glenn Harlan Reynolds, InstaPundit.com Founder and Univ. of Tennessee Professor of Law
— Glenn Harlan Reynolds, InstaPundit.com Founder and Univ. of Tennessee Professor of Law
 
Liberty Poll   

Are your local schools currently facing open debate with parents regarding the introduction of radical leftist ideological positions into the curricula?