Today, continuing our longstanding opposition to the ruination of American healthcare by importing foreign…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
CFIF Joins 75-Group National & State Coalition Opposing Socialized Medicine and Importation of Foreign Price Controls

Today, continuing our longstanding opposition to the ruination of American healthcare by importing foreign price controls and socialized medicine, CFIF proudly joins a 75-group coalition letter to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services opposing the interim final rule to implement the "Most Favored Nation" (MFN) model under Section 1115A of the Social Security Act, which forces physicians, patients and providers into a mandatory demonstration under the ObamaCare Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI), and which ties prices paid for medicines in Medicare Part B to the prices paid in socialized healthcare systems of foreign nations.

Specifically, the letter explains in detail how the rule will do nothing to stop foreign freeloading off of American pharmaceutical innovation…[more]

January 25, 2021 • 04:53 PM

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's CourtroomLegal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts.
Biden Keeps Scotus List Secret, Refuses to Disavow Court-Packing Scheme Print
By Byron York
Wednesday, September 23 2020
There's a presidential campaign going on. Biden is the Democratic Party candidate. A Supreme Court justice has died, leaving a critical vacancy. Of course voters want to know who each candidate would pick.

In a few days, we'll know who President Trump wants to be the next Supreme Court justice. Republicans will praise her qualifications, her intellect, her judicial temperament. Democrats will oppose. There will be an opportunity for a real debate: Should the president's nominee be confirmed to the nation's highest court?

The nomination will also highlight an enormous difference between Trump and Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden. Trump's choice for the court will be out there for all to see, while Biden refuses to reveal even a list of people he would consider nominating, should he win the presidency.

Beyond that, there lies the growing threat from some Democrats that if Trump's nominee is confirmed, and if Biden wins the election, and if Democrats win the Senate and House, then Democrats will add some number of justices to the Supreme Court  pack the court  to ensure its liberal tilt. It's an enormous issue for the Supreme Court and its role in American governance. And now, Biden won't say where he stands on that, either.

Biden campaigned in Manitowoc, Wisconsin, on Monday. He did an interview with local television station WBAY in which reporter Brittany Schmidt asked him: "President Trump is expected to announce his pick for Supreme Court later this weekend. You've said you won't announce yours, but does that news change your decision?"

"Not at all," Biden answered. "No president has ever announced his picks that early. Number two, if I were to do that, I find myself in a position where they would be subject to intense criticism for a long time, because if I am elected and enough Republicans screw up the courage to say, 'Let's wait until the election is over and see who wins,' if I were picked they wouldn't get a hearing until sometime at the end of January, beginning of February, and it's just not appropriate to put them in that spot."

Of course, in 2016, with a Supreme Court seat open, candidate Donald Trump released a list of candidates for the court and promised to pick a nominee from that list. Doing that helped him solidify his bond to a Republican base, for whom the court is a huge issue. Then, when elected, Trump kept that promise, and the bond became even stronger. Now, there is no reason Biden could not release his own list of candidates for the court.

But Biden is afraid his choices will be criticized. Well, of course they will! That's part of the process of confirming a Supreme Court justice. Who would know that better than Joe Biden? For years, he served as chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee. He presided over his party's brutal nomination attacks on Justice Clarence Thomas. Now, he's afraid that if he names even a list of possible nominees, they will be criticized.

And then, in that WBAY interview, Biden would not renounce Democratic court-packing schemes. Schmidt asked: "If Trump's Supreme Court pick goes through but you win the election, Democrats take over the Senate and maintain the House, would you consider adding more Supreme Court justices to the bench?"

Biden, who last year said he opposed such schemes, refused to answer. "It's a legitimate question," he said. "But let me tell you why I'm not going to answer that question. Because it will shift the whole focus, that's what he [Trump] wants, he never wants to talk about the issue at hand; he always tries to change the subject. Let's say I answer that question. Then the whole debate's going to be, well, Biden said or didn't say, Biden said he would or wouldn't. The discussion should be about why he is moving in a direction that's totally inconsistent with what the Founders wanted. The Constitution says ... voters get to pick a president who gets to make the pick, and the Senate gets to decide. We're in the middle of an election right now, you know, people are voting now. By the time this Supreme Court hearing would be held, if they hold one, it's estimated 30% to 40% of the American people already have voted. It is a fundamental breach of constitutional principle. It must stay on that and it shouldn't happen."

It was a mind-boggling answer. If I take a position, Biden said, then people will talk about it. Well, yes, they will. There's a presidential campaign going on. Biden is the Democratic Party candidate. A Supreme Court justice has died, leaving a critical vacancy. Of course voters want to know who each candidate would pick. And if one party is threatening judicial Armageddon  packing the court  then voters want to know where the candidates stand on that, too.

So far, though, Joe Biden remains steadfastly silent. And that leads to one more question  whether he can keep his thoughts secret until Election Day.

Byron York is chief political correspondent for The Washington Examiner.

Question of the Week   
Which one of the following was eulogized as “First in war, first in peace, and first in the hearts of his countrymen”?
More Questions
Quote of the Day   
"Incoming Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg has suggested taxing Americans for the number of miles they drive, a policy he endorsed as a Democratic presidential candidate.The Biden Administration is actively searching for ways to fund its ambitious $1 trillion infrastructure plan.Buttigieg, the former mayor of South Bend, Ind., acknowledged 'privacy concerns' related to implementing a vehicle…[more]
—Nicholas Ballasy, Just the News Senior Correspondent
— Nicholas Ballasy, Just the News Senior Correspondent
Liberty Poll   

Would a federally mandated $15 an hour minimum wage have a positive or negative impact on your state's overall economy?