America as we know it was built largely upon and because of our rail industry, and today it remains…
CFIF on X CFIF on YouTube
So-Called "Railway Safety Act" Constitutes a Political Handout to Big Labor That Does Nothing to Improve Safety At All

America as we know it was built largely upon and because of our rail industry, and today it remains a pillar of our economy.

Unfortunately, a destructive proposal before Congress misleadingly named the "Railway Safety Act" (RSA), part of broader surface transportation reauthorization, threatens great harm to our railroads.

Simply put, the bill has nothing to do with improving safety, but has a lot to do with advancing the political agenda of Big Labor.  At a moment when inflation burdens American families and fragile supply chains remain vulnerable to disruption, the last thing our economy or rail sector need is another costly federal mandate imposed upon one of the nation’s most important transportation sectors.

As an initial matter, as noted by The Wall Street Journal, the…[more]

May 20, 2026 • 04:28 PM
The “Party of Science” Somehow Misses Its Own Laboratory Failures Print
By Timothy H. Lee
Thursday, February 05 2026
According to new U.S. Census data, Americans are fleeing 'blue' states en masse for 'red' states. That’s not anecdote. It’s not partisan spin. It’s the federal government’s official numbers.

Leftists gratingly insist – loudly and self-confidently – that they represent the “party of science.”  

Following the release of the United States Census Bureau’s latest data on state population and migration, however, they maintain an amusing inability to acknowledge the laboratory failures of their agenda across America.  

Those laboratories, of course, are the fifty states that constitute America’s “laboratories of democracy,” testing competing policy visions in real time.  American citizens can vote with their proverbial feet based upon the results of those laboratory tests, and they continue to do so in unambiguous numbers from “blue” states to “red” states.  

Consider California, which was once known as the “Golden State” without derision.  

Remember “California Dreamin’” by the Mamas and the Papas, singing non-sarcastically about being “safe and warm” if they were in L.A.?  The Rivieras also sang about “The Warm California Sun.”  Millions of Midwesterners watched the Rose Bowl from their frigid cities on January 1 and resolved to move there.  

And move to California they did, at least until a nearly uninterrupted three-decade statewide reign by Democrats took hold.  

Since then, the state has suffered a depressing reversal.  For the first time in California’s history, it lost enough proportional population – nearly 1.7 million between 2020 and 2025 – that House of Representatives seats were subtracted, not added.  Today, nobody refers to the “Golden State” unless with irony.  

California isn’t alone.  According to new U.S. Census data, Americans are fleeing “blue” states en masse for “red” states.  That’s not anecdote.  It’s not partisan spin.  It’s the federal government’s official numbers.  

New York, the financial and cultural capital of the planet, lost over 1.1 million people to domestic migration between 2020 and 2025.  Illinois and New Jersey remain perennial exporters of people, talent and taxpayers.  Massachusetts, despite its elite universities and innovation economy, joined the exodus club with 182,000 losses between 2020 and 2025 as well.  

In contrast, the in-migration scoreboard lights up red, politically.  

Florida gained over 890,000 domestic arrivals during that same 2020 – 2025 period while maintaining no state income tax under the governance of Ron DeSantis.  Texas added over 812,000 and continued its status as a magnet for businesses, families and jobs.  South Carolina, North Carolina and Tennessee also surged as Americans sought opportunity, affordability and policy sanity in governance.  

If this were an actual clinical laboratory trial, it would’ve been stopped years ago due to overwhelming conclusory evidence.  

Some rationalize that Americans are merely chasing better climates, as if any locale in America can match coastal California for weather.  Others claim that it’s due to cost-of-living concerns, as if those don’t reflect the politicians and public policies practiced in those states.  

The better explanation is as obvious as the census data itself:  policies matter.  

High taxes drive away businesses and workers, while overregulation suffocates businesses large and small.  Housing mandates and zoning extremism make homeownership less attainable, while soft-on-crime policies erode public safety.  Additionally, leftist governance – which elevates symbolic virtue over basic competence – gradually exhausts even loyal residents.  

Conservative states, meanwhile, embrace policies that prioritize growth over bureaucratic control:  lower taxes, lighter regulatory burdens, flexible labor markets and greater respect for the concept that individuals rather than government know best how to govern their own lives.  

None of that should appear controversial to anyone who genuinely practices evidence-based policymaking.  Rather than adjusting course, however, leftist politicians respond by doubling down – raising taxes higher, expanding regulatory overreach and blaming capitalism, climate change or the Trump Administration for problems of their own creation.  

The U.S. Census Bureau data isn’t ideological.  It’s empirical.  It’s as close as political science gets to a controlled experiment, replicated year after year.  And the results are constant and unequivocal.  

If leftists and blue state leaders insist on labeling themselves “the party of science,” they could at least do us the favor of acknowledging what the data make so plainly obvious:  their policy experiments continue to fail in the laboratories where they’re tested, and everyday Americans know it.  

Those laboratories of democracy are serving their intended function, and Americans are responding rationally, even if leftists prefer denial.

Notable Quote   
 
"For the last two months, President Trump's rhetoric on Iran has seesawed between expressing optimism on negotiations and making explicit threats to remove the mullahs from power.This week, Trump has returned to pugilistic mode, boasting of the strikes that quickly followed a regime drone attack on a US Apache helicopter -- and warning, 'We're going to hit them hard again.'Yet as long as Trump sees…[more]
 
 
— Mark Dubowitz and Miad Maleki, Foundation for Defense of Democracies
 
Liberty Poll   

Does the current political environment of overt hostility toward any opposite viewpoint make you want to engage more or retreat from personal involvement?