America as we know it was built largely upon and because of our rail industry, and today it remains…
CFIF on X CFIF on YouTube
So-Called "Railway Safety Act" Constitutes a Political Handout to Big Labor That Does Nothing to Improve Safety At All

America as we know it was built largely upon and because of our rail industry, and today it remains a pillar of our economy.

Unfortunately, a destructive proposal before Congress misleadingly named the "Railway Safety Act" (RSA), part of broader surface transportation reauthorization, threatens great harm to our railroads.

Simply put, the bill has nothing to do with improving safety, but has a lot to do with advancing the political agenda of Big Labor.  At a moment when inflation burdens American families and fragile supply chains remain vulnerable to disruption, the last thing our economy or rail sector need is another costly federal mandate imposed upon one of the nation’s most important transportation sectors.

As an initial matter, as noted by The Wall Street Journal, the…[more]

May 20, 2026 • 04:28 PM
What if Republicans Lose Both House and Senate? Print
By Byron York
Tuesday, August 04 2026
Republicans hold 53 seats in the Senate, which means Democrats would have to win four currently Republican-held seats to win control.

The odds are Republicans will lose control of the House in the coming midterms  for five reasons: 1. their current majority is so narrow that losing a literal handful of seats would cost them control; 2. they will be hurt by President Donald Trump's low job approval rating, especially on his handling of the economy; 3. the so-called "generic ballot" poll shows voters would prefer a Democrat to represent them in the House; 4. the Iran/Mideast war will be a continuing source of uncertainty and tension for the GOP; and 5. precedent strongly suggests the party that controls the White House will lose a substantial number of House seats.

So what if Democrats win? Although there is some internal party debate on this question, there's a real possibility a new Democratic majority in the House would impeach Trump for a third time. And there's no doubt in the world that Democrats would kill the president's legislative agenda. As bad as that is, it's a situation Trump could live with because 1. a third impeachment would have a been-there-done-that quality, and Trump would prevail again; and 2. beyond the SAVE America Act, which will not pass this year, Trump doesn't really have a legislative agenda to kill.

Losing the Senate, on the other hand, would be damaging for Trump because he needs to have his nominees  for the courts and for his administration  confirmed. A united Democratic majority in the Senate could stop all that cold, and probably would, given the state of today's politics.

So how much chance does Trump have of losing the Senate? The answer appears to be more of a chance than he had a few months ago.

Republicans hold 53 seats in the Senate, which means Democrats would have to win four currently Republican-held seats to win control. This time last year, that seemed a remote possibility. But now there are six Republican seats that Democrats have a non-zero chance of winning. And there are just two Democratic seats in significant jeopardy.

On the Republican side: North Carolina, the seat currently held by retiring Sen. Thom Tillis seems gone. That's one pickup for the Democrats. Seats in Iowa, currently held by retiring Republican Sen. Joni Ernst, and Ohio, held by appointed Republican Sen. Jon Husted, could go either way. Maine and Alaska, where Republican Sens. Susan Collins and Dan Sullivan face serious challenges, could also end badly for the GOP. And the Texas seat currently held by Republican John Cornyn, where some Republicans scoff at the weakness of Democratic challenger James Talarico, is in clear danger. Yes, Talarico is a terrible candidate, but so is Ken Paxton, the Trump-backed candidate who beat Cornyn in a GOP primary.

On the Democratic side: Michigan, the seat held by retiring Sen. Gary Peters is a real pickup opportunity for Republicans. New Hampshire, the seat held by retiring Sen. Jeanne Shaheen is in play but seems, for the moment, leaning toward staying Democratic. And that's about it.

The possibility that Republicans could win Michigan, where Democrats are poised to nominate Abdul El-Sayed, a DSA-style progressive who could struggle in a general election, is pretty much the entire bright side for Republicans when it comes to pickups.

If the GOP does win Michigan, Democrats would then have to win five currently Republican seats to win control of the Senate. That would be hard, but doable. Go down the list: North Carolina, Ohio, Maine, Iowa, Texas and Alaska. It is not at all outside the realm of possibility that Democrats could win all but one of them. 

It is important to say that this is how the situation looks right now, in early August, for voting that will take place in early November. Of course things will change in the next three months. Candidates currently in tight races could pull ahead or fall back. Mistakes could be made. The political landscape could shift. All sorts of things could happen.

But there is no reason for Republicans to feel confident that, after losing the House, they will still have the Senate. They could lose both. And then, President Trump and his party will be in for a couple of trying years.


 

Byron York is chief political correspondent for The Washington Examiner.

COPYRIGHT 2026 BYRON YORK

Notable Quote   
 
"Hamas officials routinely bullied and intimidated employees of U.S.-funded NGOs operating in Gaza in order to control their operations, according to a confidential probe by American investigators that was obtained by the Washington Free Beacon. The probe reveals that Hamas threatened to sic its fearsome police force on aid workers and even tried to access the NGOs' private employee data as the terror…[more]
 
 
— Adam Kredo, Washington Free Beacon
 
Liberty Poll   

Do you believe "Democratic Socialist" candidates will represent only small, isolated wins in upcoming elections or a troubling larger phenomenon?