Among the foremost threats to individual freedom in America is the abusive and oftentimes lawless behavior…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
More Legal Shenanigans from the Biden Administration’s Department of Education

Among the foremost threats to individual freedom in America is the abusive and oftentimes lawless behavior of federal administrative agencies, whose vast armies of overpaid bureaucrats remain unaccountable for their excesses.

Among the most familiar examples of that bureaucratic abuse is the Department of Education (DOE).  Recall, for instance, the United States Supreme Court’s humiliating rebuke last year of the Biden DOE’s effort to shift hundreds of billions of dollars of student debt from the people who actually owed them onto the backs of American taxpayers.

Even now, despite that rebuke, the Biden DOE launched an alternative scheme last month in an end-around effort to achieve that same result.

Well, the Biden DOE is now attempting to shift tens of millions of dollars of…[more]

March 19, 2024 • 08:35 AM

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
A Landmark Presidency No More? Obama’s Historical Legacy May be Smaller Than He Thinks Print
By Troy Senik
Thursday, December 02 2010
The years remaining in Obama’s presidency allow him an opportunity for redemption. Should he miss that chance, however, history’s verdict will not be kind.

If a classified ad ran for the presidency of the United States, any serious applicant could be considered a ripe prospect for involuntary commitment.

To attain the office, you have to campaign for nearly two years straight, jockeying all the while against a handful of the most talented citizens in the nation. You then have to inspire financial donations at a level tantamount to the GDP of a Caribbean nation, win the majority approval of a haltingly heterodox populace, keep 20-hour work days under a relentless media glare without committing a major gaffe and manage an alchemy of folksiness and gravitas sufficient to convince the nation that you’re trustworthy enough to both babysit their children and command the most powerful nation in the history of the planet.
 
Should you win, you’ll endure scorn for every deficiency facing the nation, take the job with you during every waking moment and see every aspect of your life become fodder for the pop psychology of undereducated, overcoiffed pundits.
 
In this maelstrom, presidents – for whom steady adversity is a standard feature, not a bug – often seek solace in the promise that “History” will render ultimate judgment upon them. Yet as Oscar Wilde said, “When the gods wish to punish us, they answer our prayers.”

Though only 43 men have occupied the American presidency, a typical American can summon to mind only a half dozen or so who predate his lifetime. For most commanders-in-chief, history has little to say. And that’s the sort of fact that keeps a president staring at his bedroom ceiling at night.
 
Spending the winter of his discontent grasping at the hope he once thought he embodied, Barack Obama seems to be flirting with the prospect of historical vindication. Sympathetic members of the intelligentsia and the Beltway establishment, finding no silver lining in the cloud currently hanging over the White House, still mention the “historic nature” of his presidency. Obama has even flirted with the notion aloud, telling Diane Sawyer that he’d rather be “a really good one-term president” than a “mediocre two-term president.” Unfortunately for him, the former phrase is virtually always oxymoronic.
 
Yet the case for Obama’s historical relevance is thus far gossamer thin. First, there’s the problem of insufficient data.

At the corresponding point in the Clinton Administration, there had been no Oklahoma City bombing, no government shutdown, no welfare reform, no Lewinsky scandal, no operation in Kosovo and no balanced budgets.

At the same point in the Bush Administration, there had been no Iraq war, no Hurricane Katrina, no push for Social Security and immigration reform and no financial crisis.

Knowing where the Obama Administration’s historical record is headed before it has hit year three is about as plausible as knowing what “Rosebud” means half an hour into “Citizen Kane.”
 
But an even bigger problem arises for those who wish to make the case that Obama’s early accomplishments are enough to secure his place in the pantheon of great presidents. In reality, only Obama’s stature as the nation’s first African-American chief executive can bear such a claim. And while this is a deeply significant achievement, it’s one that has no bearing on his performance in office.
 
Turning to the Obama record, the case becomes exceedingly murky. There’s no question that Obama’s healthcare reform places him alongside Franklin Roosevelt and Lyndon Johnson, both celebrated as liberal activists because of their ability to enact new entitlement programs (it’s an unfortunate reality of the modern historian’s craft that “activist” and “successful” are synonyms when describing a president). But if ObamaCare is repealed in the coming years, it will be even more historic – the first time that a major entitlement has been scrapped. And with health care reform gone, all Obama will have to show for his tenure in office thus far is a failed stimulus package and a financial reform bill of trifling historical consequence.
 
Indeed, the public revolt against ObamaCare reveals what may become the most historically salient fact of Obama’s presidency: the dashing of expectations. Never before has such a massive social program been enacted against such vigorous public opposition. Never has a president met with such sprawling goodwill at his inauguration fallen so far so fast. Never since 1938 has a president been so decisively rebuffed in midterm elections.  And never has popular infatuation with a political figure morphed into contempt at such a fevered pace. 
 
The years remaining in Obama’s presidency allow him an opportunity for redemption. Should he miss that chance, however, history’s verdict will not be kind. Obama will be remembered as a failure … if he is remembered for anything beyond his inauguration.

Notable Quote   
 
"Americans do not trust several major U.S. institutions, including the national news media.The recently released Center Square Voters' Voice poll found that 43% of Americans say the media is trustworthy, compared with 54% who said it is not trustworthy.Younger people were more likely to trust the media, with 47% of those ages 18-34 saying they trust it and 46% saying the opposite.The numbers steadily…[more]
 
 
— Casey Harper, The Center Square
 
Liberty Poll   

Do you believe the U.S. Supreme Court will ultimately reject the new Biden administration automobile emissions rule as beyond the scope of administrative agency authority?