CFIF often highlights how the Biden Administration's bizarre decision to resurrect failed Title II "…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
Image of the Day: U.S. Internet Speeds Skyrocketed After Ending Failed Title II "Net Neutrality" Experiment

CFIF often highlights how the Biden Administration's bizarre decision to resurrect failed Title II "Net Neutrality" internet regulation, which caused private broadband investment to decline for the first time ever outside of a recession during its brief experiment at the end of the Obama Administration, is a terrible idea that will only punish consumers if allowed to take effect.

Here's what happened after that brief experiment was repealed under the Trump Administration and Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chairman Ajit Pai - internet speeds skyrocketed despite late-night comedians' and left-wing activists' warnings that the internet was doomed:

[caption id="" align="aligncenter" width="515"] Internet Speeds Post-"Net Neutrality"[/caption]

 …[more]

April 19, 2024 • 09:51 AM

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
CFIF Urges U.S. Supreme Court to Protect Private Property Print
By CFIF Staff
Thursday, March 26 2009

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
March 26, 2009

Amicus Brief Urges High Court to Hear Empress Casino Joliet v. Giannoulias

ALEXANDRIA, VA — The Center for Individual Freedom (“CFIF”) last week joined with nine other national and state organizations in filing an amicus brief with the U.S. Supreme Court urging it to grant certiorari in the case of Empress Casino Joliet v. Giannoulias.

At issue in the case is the constitutionality of an Illinois statute that “taxes” just four riverboat casinos in the state for the sole purpose of directly transferring that money to Illinois’ five horse-racing tracks.  Unfortunately, the Illinois Supreme Court recently upheld the statute.  

CFIF’s brief charges that the Illinois statute directly violates the Fifth Amendment’s

Takings Clause and urges the U.S. Supreme Court to hear the case and reverse the Illinois High Court’s decision.  Specifically, the brief argues that a “law that forces one segment of an industry to directly support another imposes a taking without just compensation.”

“If allowed to stand, the Illinois statute will improperly impart unprecedented taxing authority on federal, state and local governments to unfairly seize revenues of one industry, or a portion of that industry, and directly transfer them to another,” said Jeffrey Mazzella, CFIF’s president.  “Such authority strikes at the core of the Fifth Amendment, which states that a government taking of private property is only permitted for public use, and only if just compensation is paid.  The Illinois statute circumvents both of those prongs, therefore undermining the very property rights protections that are at the heart of the Fifth Amendment,” Mazzella said.  

Earlier this week, The Wall Street Journal published an editorial on the case in which it suggested the Illinois statute was passed in part as a result of corruption by now-impeached Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich.  “Among the evidence in the Governor's impeachment trial were transcripts of Mr. Blagojevich and his brother Rob discussing some $100,000 in contributions as a quid pro quo for the legislation to benefit the racing industry,” The Wall Street Journal wrote. 

In addition to CFIF, other organizations that signed the brief, initiated by and including the National Taxpayers Union, are the American Association of Small Property Owners, Citizen Outreach, Citizens for Limited Taxation, Evergreen Freedom Foundation, Grassroot Institute of Hawaii, Hawaiian Values, Rio Grande Foundation and Small Business Hawaii.

Notable Quote   
 
"Remember when progressives said the Trump Administration's rollback of net neutrality would break the internet? Federal Communications Commission Chair Jessica Rosenworcel now concedes this was wrong, yet she plans to reclaim political control over the internet anyway to stop a parade of new and highly doubtful horribles.The FCC on Thursday is expected to vote to reclassify broadband providers as…[more]
 
 
— Wall Street Journal Editorial Board
 
Liberty Poll   

If TikTok's data collection or manipulation under Chinese ownership is the grave danger that our government says it is (and it may well be), then wouldn't the prudent action be to ban it immediately rather than some time down the road?