There's a destructive campaign underway to encourage government confiscation of patents from pharmaceutical…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
Image of the Day: Private Pharma Investment Dwarfs Federal NIH Funding

There's a destructive campaign underway to encourage government confiscation of patents from pharmaceutical innovators and dictate the price for Remdesivir and other drugs.  That's a terrible and counterproductive policy under any circumstance, but particularly now that private drug innovators are already hacking away at the coronavirus.  In that vein, this helpful image illustrates the vast disparity between private investment and National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding that some seem to think justifies patent confiscation, price controls or other big-government schemes:

 

[caption id="" align="alignleft" width="964"] Private Investment Dwarfs NIH Funding[/caption]…[more]

June 01, 2020 • 10:24 AM

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's CourtroomLegal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts.
ObamaCare’s “Data Hub” Should be Its Death Knell Print
By Ashton Ellis
Thursday, July 25 2013
Confidence in the government’s ability to protect the private information of millions of Americans diminishes even more when one considers that the Hub has not even been tested for security weaknesses.

With a string of controversial policy decisions, ObamaCare’s Federal Data Hub is shaping up to be the new poster child for government waste, fraud and abuse. 

The waste is apparent to anyone familiar with the current state of health technology. Already there are at least 100 companies that operate private health insurance exchanges, according to John C. Goodman, a health expert at the National Center for Data Analysis.

But rather than write the law in such a way to make ObamaCare subsidies easily compatible with these preexisting systems, the drafters left open the possibility for an added layer of bureaucracy to spring up.

True to form, no state-operated exchange has allowed a privately owned exchange to act as a point of entry for ObamaCare users. Instead, states are spending huge sums essentially to duplicate a service already available. California alone has spent $900 million.

Fraud in the form of identity theft is also a huge concern thanks to a policy fiat issued by the Health and Human Services department. The Federal Data Hub is an integral part of making sure that the people applying for ObamaCare subsidies actually qualify for them.

In theory, the Hub is supposed to be a kind of super-server, combining information currently housed in various state agencies and the IRS into a single system. A sister database to the Hub will house other sensitive information “such as income, Social Security numbers, email addresses, and even pregnancy status of ObamaCare users,” according to reporting by Paul Bedard in the Washington Examiner. 

But because the health and financial information to be accessed is so sensitive, putting it all into two easily accessible search engines will make them a magnet for hackers and identity thieves.

Confidence in the government’s ability to protect the private information of millions of Americans diminishes even more when one considers that the Hub has not even been tested for security weaknesses. The main reason for the delay: The Hub isn’t finished yet.

With just over two months until citizens can begin purchasing insurance on ObamaCare exchanges on October 1, the Obama administration’s response to critics’ security concerns is – trust us.

But why would we?  The stakes regarding sensitive personal information are immense, and early decisions provide zero basis for trust.

In its rush to sign up as many people as possible on the exchanges, the Obama administration announced that it would abuse basic hiring standards by lowering the qualification threshold for those wanting to become so-called “patient navigators.”

Navigators are people who assist others in applying for ObamaCare subsidies.

Instead of requiring the same level of credentialing that is required to work at the IRS and Census Bureau – at least a high school diploma and a criminal background check – the Obama Health and Human Services department is waiving those and will now allow anyone who completes a 20-30 hour online training seminar to get access to an applicant’s personal information. What’s more, navigators will be paid $20-48 an hour by the federal government for their work.

And don’t think that community organizers of every stripe aren’t chomping at the bit to navigate people into a government subsidy. Guidelines released by HHS indicate that some of the groups already lining up to get certified “include Planned Parenthood, senior-citizen advocacy organizations, and churches,” John Fund wrote recently in National Review.

Moreover, if other states follow California’s lead, ObamaCare exchanges could become a voter registration agency under the National Voter Registration Act, allowing them to combine voter registration with every transaction they have with a health insurance buyer. All financed, of course, with money neither the State of California nor the federal government has.

This parade of horribles occurs only if the Hub and its sister database operate as intended. What’s more likely in the near term is a raft of gaffes, glitches and security breakdowns that make Wikileaks, Edward Snowden and the IRS scandal seem like the good old days.

With the next debt-ceiling showdown looming in October, Republicans in Congress have one more opportunity to defund ObamaCare before it lurches to life. If they don’t, we’ll all pay dearly.

Question of the Week   
The largest-ever helicopter evacuation took place during which of the following conflicts?
More Questions
Quote of the Day   
 
"Law enforcement is a vital response to any riotous uprising. Indeed, I believe the failure to enforce the laws without apology from the start of the upheaval last week has fueled its ferocity. It would be naive to claim that much of the violence, which is being incited and coordinated by radical groups, might not have happened anyway -- these groups are always on a hair-trigger, pouncing on any opportunity…[more]
 
 
—Andrew C. McCarthy, Legal Commentator, Terrorism Expert and Former Federal Prosecutor
— Andrew C. McCarthy, Legal Commentator, Terrorism Expert and Former Federal Prosecutor
 
Liberty Poll   

Until this week, the U.S. House has required Members to be physically present to vote. Due to coronavirus, "proxy voting," allowing Members to cast votes for absent colleagues, is now being used. Should "proxy voting" be allowed to continue?