This week marks the 40th anniversary of the Staggers Rail Act of 1980, which deregulated American freight…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
Happy 40th to the Staggers Rail Act, Which Deregulated and Saved the U.S. Rail Industry

This week marks the 40th anniversary of the Staggers Rail Act of 1980, which deregulated American freight rail and saved it from looming oblivion.

At the time of passage, the U.S. economy muddled along amid ongoing malaise, and our rail industry teetered due to decades of overly bureaucratic sclerosis.  Many other domestic U.S. industries had disappeared, and our railroads faced the same fate.  But by passing the Staggers Rail Act, Congress restored a deregulatory approach that in the 1980s allowed other U.S. industries to thrive.  No longer would government determine what services railroads could offer, their rates or their routes, instead restoring greater authority to the railroads themselves based upon cost-efficiency.

Today, U.S. rail flourishes even amid the coronavirus pandemic…[more]

October 13, 2020 • 11:09 PM

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's CourtroomLegal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts.
Don’t Let Congressional Liberals Undermine Patent Rights Amid Coronavirus Fight Print
By Timothy H. Lee
Friday, May 08 2020
At this moment of coronavirus pandemic crisis and compressed timeline to defeat it, we must accelerate patent incentives, not diminish them.

To better appreciate the towering leadership role that America’s pharmaceutical sector plays in the world, consider the following comparison metric. 

In World War II, America earned the label “Arsenal of Democracy” by rapidly and massively mobilizing to lead the Allied victory through sheer scale of armament production and innovation.  Over our four-year involvement, the United States manufactured approximately half of all planes, ships, vehicles and other armaments produced by the major combatants – as much as the rest of them combined. 

That remains an astonishing ratio.  But believe it or not, America’s global role in producing lifesaving pharmaceuticals actually dwarfs even that disparity. 

Specifically, as America and the world face a new different threat today, the United States pharmaceutical industry accounts for fully two-thirds of all new drugs introduced worldwide.  All of Europe, with its higher combined population than the United States, accounts for just 24.8%, while Japan accounts for just 10.7%. 

It’s therefore unsurprising that as we desperately seek a treatment or cure for coronavirus on a compressed timeline, America’s private pharmaceutical innovators are already leading the way. 

For example, Pfizer Inc. announced that its experimental vaccine could be ready for emergency use as soon as this fall, following an accelerated testing calendar that began this week.  Moderna Inc. similarly announced recently that its own vaccine will soon enter the second stage of human testing, and Johnson & Johnson announced that it has accelerated the typical vaccine development timeline in order to commence human testing as early as September, with wider emergency availability by early 2021. 

Just last week, to widespread publicity including from the White House, American biopharmaceutical company Gilead Sciences received Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authorization to use the drug remdesivir to treat coronavirus patients.  

To understand why the U.S. pharmaceutical sector continues to lead the world in offering hope against scourges like today’s coronavirus pandemic, look no further than our legacy of patent protections, according to Gilead directors John Cogan and George Shultz in a Wall Street Journal commentary entitled “Remdesivir Affirms the American Way”: 

Patent protection provides drug companies with additional incentives over and above those normally provided by the market to undertake the necessary risks. The incentives come from governmental protection of intellectual property and the associated ability temporarily to charge prices above marginal cost of production. 

Throughout America’s history, we’ve protected patent and other intellectual property rights like no other nation, which maximizes both fairness and societal utility. 

Additionally, federal policies encouraging public/private cooperation have also played a vital role. 

This year, for instance, we celebrate the 40th anniversary of the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, which The Economist magazine labeled, “possibly the most inspired piece of legislation to be enacted in America over the past half-century.”  Among other improvements, Bayh-Dole extended patent rights to universities and non-profit research groups receiving federal funds to assist their research, as highlighted by Information Technology and Innovation Foundation (ITIF) Vice President Stephen Ezell: 

Prior to the Bayh-Dole Act, when the federal government retained ownership of the innovations it funded, very few were ever commercially produced. Only 390 patents were awarded to universities in the year the act was passed. But in 2017, that number had increased to nearly 7,500. In fact, more than 100,000 patents have been issued to U.S. universities or nonprofit research institutes between 1996 and 2017, resulting in more than 420,000 inventions and 13,000 startup companies formed. 

In sad commentary on our current political state, however, some Congressional liberals seek to limit, rather than strengthen, patent rights for pharmaceutical innovators, including those working furiously to perfect vaccines, diagnostics, therapies and cures for coronavirus.  The straightforward lesson of American history and our ongoing medical supremacy is that stronger patent rights lead to more innovation, and wiser voices in Congress must flatly reject that dangerous proposal. 

At this moment of coronavirus pandemic crisis and compressed timeline to defeat it, we must accelerate patent incentives, not diminish them.  Stronger patent rights and freer markets are already paying off and offer our best hope, as long as Congress doesn’t tragically disrupt what’s working. 

Question of the Week   
Which one of the following was the first 20th century presidential candidate to call for a Presidential Debate?
More Questions
Quote of the Day   
 
"Democratic Presidential Nominee Joe Biden admitted during Thursday night's final presidential debate that he going to end the oil industry if elected president.'Would you close down the oil industry?' President Donald Trump pressed just before their closing statements.'I would transition from the oil industry, yes' Biden replied. ...'That's a big statement,' Trump said, slamming Biden for his bold…[more]
 
 
—Jordan Davidson, The Federalist
— Jordan Davidson, The Federalist
 
Liberty Poll   

Do you believe Republicans will continue to hold a majority in the U.S. Senate following the 2020 election?