Many claim to prefer bipartisanship out of leaders in Washington, D.C., and right now we're witnessing…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
Bipartisan Senators' Letter to NLRB Opposes Destructive Proposed "Joint Employer Rule"

Many claim to prefer bipartisanship out of leaders in Washington, D.C., and right now we're witnessing an encouraging example of it.

Specifically, Senators Mike Braun (R - Indiana), Joe Manchin (D - West Virginia), Angus King (I - Maine), James Lankford (R - Oklahoma), Kyrsten Sinema (D - Arizona), and Susan Collins (R - Maine) have written National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) Chairman Lauren McFerran seeking reconsideration of the NLRB's proposed "Joint Employer Rule" that they correctly warn "would have negative effects on workers and businesses during a time that many are already struggling following the COVID-19 pandemic."

For years we at CFIF have sounded the alarm on the Joint Employer Rule that the Senators target, because it would dangerously reverse decades of established labor…[more]

December 08, 2022 • 11:03 AM

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's Courtroom Legal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts
Dems Want to Insure Illegals, Don't Care About Vets and Middle Class Print
By Betsy McCaughey
Wednesday, July 03 2019
None of the candidates gushing about health care for illegals as a human right showed the same ardor for veterans' health care.

It's official. Democratic Party Chair Tom Perez confirms the Party fully endorses free health care for illegal immigrants. That puts illegals ahead of veterans struggling to qualify for civilian care, middle-class working stiffs priced out of Obamacare and baby boomers facing the likelihood of Medicare cuts.

At last Thursday's Democratic presidential debate, all 10 candidates on the stage flung up their hands when asked whether they'd cover illegal aliens.

Not one of the debate moderators went on to ask the obvious: How much will it cost, and who will pay for it? Why spoil a Kumbaya moment?

The costs would be huge. According to Pew Foundation researchers, there were 10.5 million illegals in the nation in 2017. In 2018, Yale University and MIT demographers estimated there are double.

If the entire illegal population were enrolled in Medicaid, the tab would range from a whopping $84 billion a year (10.5 million times $8,015 per person Medicaid cost) to more than double that, $176 billion. But that estimate needs to be pared to reflect the millions of illegals who work and already get insurance through an employer. Covering uninsured illegals is likely to cost $40 billion to $80 billion a year.

That cost could explode if Democrats push through their open-borders agenda. The frontrunners on the stage Thursday night  Joe Biden, Kamala Harris and Bernie Sanders  said they would stop prosecuting and deporting illegals except those guilty of committing serious crimes. In the Democrats' view, sneaking into the country should be a civil violation, like getting a parking ticket. With no border enforcement, the number of illegals is likely to soar, pushing up the cost of their health care. So consider $40 billion to $80 billion a lowball cost estimate.

None of the candidates gushing about health care for illegals as a human right showed the same ardor for veterans' health care. For years, the VA has been embroiled in scandals over vets dying waiting for medical care. Still, Congress is nickel-and-diming the money it spends to allow vets to see civilian doctors and get other civilian medical services. The total in the proposed 2020 budget is $8.9 billion, less than half what advocacy groups claim is needed to relieve the deadly backlog at VA hospitals.

But Democrats are willing to spend at least four times that much on health insurance for illegals. What kind of priority is that?

Worse, Congress is appropriating a paltry $1.8 billion to help homeless vets. Of course, politicians find these comparisons inconvenient. The Democratic candidates would like you to believe no one has to go without in order to fund health care for illegals.

But the ugly reality became obvious in California this month, when the Democratic-dominated state legislature voted to fund health coverage for illegals up to age 25. How to pay for it? Democratic lawmakers are slapping a hefty tax  up to $3,252  on people who go without health insurance, even if they're uninsured because they can't afford it. The result is a single working guy who earns $80,000 a year (which doesn't go far in Los Angeles), is ineligible for an Obamacare subsidy and will now be forced to pay a whopping fine toward insuring illegals, while he goes without coverage himself.

The real health insurance crisis in this country isn't about illegals. It's about the middle class. The Affordable Care Act added millions of mostly poor people to the insurance rolls. But the same law is driving premiums so high that middle-class people are priced out. They're ineligible for government subsidies if they earn over $48,560 as individuals or $65,840 as a couple. Roughly 5 million people are going without coverage, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.

Dems eyeing the White House never mention the plight of uninsured middle-class families. The message is clear: Illegal lives matter, but vets' lives and middle-class lives not so much.

Baby boomers also beware. In 2010, Democratic lawmakers took over $700 billion from future Medicare funding to pay for Obamacare. They robbed Grandma to fund their health care scheme, and they'll do it again.


Betsy McCaughey is a former lieutenant governor of New York State. 
COPYRIGHT 2019 CREATORS.COM

Quiz Question   
Which of the following Presidents replaced the traditional candles with electric lights on the White House Christmas tree?
More Questions
Notable Quote   
 
"Arizona Sen. Kyrsten Sinema is changing her party affiliation to independent, delivering a jolt to Democrats' narrow majority and Washington along with it.In a 45-minute interview, the first-term senator told POLITICO that she will not caucus with Republicans and suggested that she intends to vote the same way she has for four years in the Senate. 'Nothing will change about my values or my behavior…[more]
 
 
—Burgess Everett, Congressional Bureau Chief for POLITICO
— Burgess Everett, Congressional Bureau Chief for POLITICO
 
Liberty Poll   

In light of controversies over ESG pension fund investing, are you paying more attention to how and with whom your 401(k) and other retirement funds are invested?