This week marks the 40th anniversary of the Staggers Rail Act of 1980, which deregulated American freight…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
Happy 40th to the Staggers Rail Act, Which Deregulated and Saved the U.S. Rail Industry

This week marks the 40th anniversary of the Staggers Rail Act of 1980, which deregulated American freight rail and saved it from looming oblivion.

At the time of passage, the U.S. economy muddled along amid ongoing malaise, and our rail industry teetered due to decades of overly bureaucratic sclerosis.  Many other domestic U.S. industries had disappeared, and our railroads faced the same fate.  But by passing the Staggers Rail Act, Congress restored a deregulatory approach that in the 1980s allowed other U.S. industries to thrive.  No longer would government determine what services railroads could offer, their rates or their routes, instead restoring greater authority to the railroads themselves based upon cost-efficiency.

Today, U.S. rail flourishes even amid the coronavirus pandemic…[more]

October 13, 2020 • 11:09 PM

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's CourtroomLegal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts.
What Aaron Sorkin Gets Wrong About America Print
By Troy Senik
Thursday, June 28 2012
Perhaps next time Mr. Sorkin looks up from his keyboard, he will pick up a newspaper and note that the U.S., even in times as trying as these, is still a nation that has time for the downtrodden, the dispossessed and the forsaken.

Aaron Sorkin is something like the poet laureate of American television (though, in the debased world of American popular culture, that’s less of an honorific than it sounds). Sorkin, who has also scripted such films as A Few Good Men, The American President, The Social Network and Moneyball, is responsible for two of the most celebrated TV series of recent vintage, ABC’s critically acclaimed (but lightly viewed) Sports Night and NBC’s White House-centered megahit The West Wing.

There are two hallmarks to his style: lyrical, fast-paced, whip-smart dialogue and unapologetic, sometimes militant liberalism.

To Sorkin’s credit, his undeniable gifts as a writer have often been sufficient to make even conservative viewers tolerate the reflexive ideology that suffuses his work. Not so, however, in The Newsroom, his new series chronicling an anodyne television news anchor who decides mid-career to rebrand himself as a Keith Olbermann-style journalistic vigilante.

In the show’s pilot, which aired on HBO last weekend, anchor Will McAvoy (played by Jeff Daniels), has his moment of truth during a journalism panel at Northwestern University where, in rejecting the premise of a college student’s question about what makes America the greatest county on earth, he drops the aw shucks persona and responds with an anti-American rant punctuated by this aside to a conservative co-panelist:

“… You're going to tell students that America's so star-spangled awesome that we're the only ones in the world who have freedom? Canada has freedom, Japan has freedom, the UK, France, Italy, Germany, Spain, Australia, Belgium has freedom. Two hundred seven sovereign states in the world, like 180 of them have freedom.”

That’s America – just one of ninescore boringly similar free nations.

The folks at Freedom House, the non-profit organization that tracks the status of liberty throughout the world, would be surprised to hear that. According to the organization’s annual survey Freedom in the World, only 87 nations in the world can be classified as “free.” Expand the definition to include those countries dubbed “partially free” (including such libertarian paradises as Nigeria, Pakistan and Venezuela) and the number still only rises to 147. But, hey, what’s the freedom of thirty-odd nations when you can punch up a script with a nice round number?

Sorkin’s poor grasp of the facts rankles, but not nearly as much as his interpretation of their implications. Is America really little more than a bicoastal Belgium?

In truth, what makes the United States different is threefold: (1) A national history – beginning with the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution – that has liberty as its organizing principle (2) A relentless pursuit – as evinced by the Civil War and the civil rights movement – of furthering our commitment to those principles at any cost and (3) a dedication to ensuring that those principles continue to spread worldwide.

Consider two recent examples. Earlier this month, Jorge Luis García Pérez, a Cuban democracy activist, was arrested by Cuban authorities and then “brutally beaten, doused with pepper spray until unconscious and violently removed from his cell” according to a report from Perez’s wife given to Radio Republica in Miami.

His crime? He had appeared, via teleconference, before the U.S. Senate’s Foreign Relations Subcommittee on Western Hemisphere Affairs to discuss the moral degeneracy of the Castro regime. Did Austria not offer him a similar opportunity to testify? And why was it U.S. Senators Marco Rubio and Robert Menendez who attempted to publicize his abuse and not one of the friends of freedom serving in the European Parliament?

Think too of Chinese dissident Chen Guangcheng. After spending four years in prison for publicly opposing China’s policy of forced abortions and sterilizations, Chen escaped from house arrest earlier this year … and, tellingly, chose to flee to the U.S. Embassy in Beijing. Why not the embassies of Italy or Spain? Because Chen believed that the United States, more than any other nation, could be relied on to defend the conscience of one man standing against an unjust and immoral government.

Though the Obama Administration nearly botched the affair, Chen’s faith was rewarded with partial citizenship in the U.S., where’s he’s now studying at New York University’s School of Law. How many of the world’s other “free” nations would have risked alienating one of the world’s largest economic powerhouses to defend the conscience of one man?

Perhaps next time Mr. Sorkin looks up from his keyboard, he will pick up a newspaper and note that the U.S., even in times as trying as these, is still a nation that has time for the downtrodden, the dispossessed and the forsaken; for people like Jorge Luis Garcia Perez and Chen Guangcheng – people who do not share our blood, our culture or our ZIP codes.

Perhaps he’ll notice that the United States is less a landmass than an ideal – and one with the capacity of lighting the darkest corners of places like Havana and Beijing. Perhaps then he’ll realize that’s what makes us so star-spangled awesome.

Question of the Week   
Which one of the following individuals laid the ‘Golden Spike’ joining the Eastern and Western U.S. railroad lines to create the Transcontinental Railway?
More Questions
Quote of the Day   
 
"President Trump's recent executive order laying out his 'America-First Healthcare Plan' makes clear his continued commitment to the long-standing, bipartisan consensus that we should protect people with preexisting conditions. Unfortunately, the previous administration's attempt to make good on that consensus -- Obamacare -- has failed to deliver on its promises.Contrary to the prevailing media narrative…[more]
 
 
—Seema Verma, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Administrator
— Seema Verma, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Administrator
 
Liberty Poll   

Do you believe you will be better off over the next four years with Joe Biden as president or with Donald Trump as president?