FREEDOM LINE BLOG: So-Called "Railway Safety Act" Constitutes a Political Handout to Big Labor That…
America as we know it was built largely upon and because of our rail industry, and today it remains…
CFIF on X CFIF on YouTube
So-Called "Railway Safety Act" Constitutes a Political Handout to Big Labor That Does Nothing to Improve Safety At All

America as we know it was built largely upon and because of our rail industry, and today it remains a pillar of our economy.

Unfortunately, a destructive proposal before Congress misleadingly named the "Railway Safety Act" (RSA), part of broader surface transportation reauthorization, threatens great harm to our railroads.

Simply put, the bill has nothing to do with improving safety, but has a lot to do with advancing the political agenda of Big Labor.  At a moment when inflation burdens American families and fragile supply chains remain vulnerable to disruption, the last thing our economy or rail sector need is another costly federal mandate imposed upon one of the nation’s most important transportation sectors.

As an initial matter, as noted by The Wall Street Journal, the…[more]

May 20, 2026 • 04:28 PM
[close]
New Legal Analysis Supports Constitutionality of Innovative Policing Technologies Helping Solve Crimes in America Print
By CFIF Staff
Monday, March 17 2025

"When appropriate guardrails are in place, License Plate Reader (LPR) technology does not violate Fourth Amendment rights and is a valuable tool for making our communities safer."  

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, the Center for Individual Freedom (CFIF) released a new primer analyzing the legal basis behind law enforcement’s use of license plate recognition (LPR) technology.

Known for their accuracy, swift crime-solving capabilities and crime-deterring effectiveness, LPRs have occasionally come under misplaced critique from privacy activists. CFIF’s new primer analyzes applicable legal precedent to demonstrate that LPRs “accord with longstanding principles of individual privacy protection under our Constitution and judicial precedent, and the real-world data and police testimonials make its value obvious.”

Timothy Lee, CFIF’s Senior Vice President of Legal and Public Affairs and author of the paper, reiterated the need for consumers and lawmakers to rely upon relevant case law to understand the constitutionality of LPR technology instead of inapplicable caselaw and imaginary fears about how the technology is used. 

“Contrary to popular belief, this technology is not a 24/7 surveillance device. It takes very targeted captures of license plate information and does not track your everyday movements and activities," writes Lee, who prior to joining CFIF was an attorney in private practice in the Los Angeles, California and Phoenix, Arizona metropolitan areas. 

"Backed by a plethora of legal precedent, we can simultaneously establish and enforce strict protections to prevent abuse, ensure transparency and limit data retention. While the path forward requires a balanced approach, it is more than evident that the benefits of LPR technology should be utilized nationwide to further enhance public safety," Lee continued.

Prior to joining CFIF, Mr. Lee was an attorney in private practice in the Los Angeles, California and Phoenix, Arizona metropolitan areas. He is a graduate of the University of Southern California Gould School of Law.   

To read the full legal analysis, please click here. 

###

 
Related Articles :
Notable Quote   
 
"Most Americans are well aware that living in debt -- consuming beyond what one can afford -- without a sustainable budget plan is haphazard; those who do so are often deemed to lack foresight. Collectively, Americans carry roughly $18.8 trillion in household debt. America's national debt, meanwhile, is more than double that amount.The amount owed by the U.S. government exceeds $290,000 per household…[more]
  
 
— Vladlena Klymova, Policy Analyst at the Taxpayers Protection Alliance
 
Liberty Poll   

Given the late implosion of U.S. Senate candidate Graham Platner in Maine, do you think voters, responsible media and the political parties will begin to seriously investigate political candidates earlier in the process?