| |
On the Future of ObamaCare: |
|
| |
"Obamacare has so far fallen dramatically short of what was expected -- technically, and in almost every other way. Enrollment is below expectations: According to the data we have so far, more than half of the much-touted Medicaid expansion came from people who were already eligible before the health-care law passed, and this weekend, the Wall Street Journal reported that the overwhelming majority of people buying insurance through the exchanges seem to be folks who already had insurance. Coverage is less generous than many people expected, with narrower provider networks and higher deductibles. The promised $2,500 that the average family was told they could save on premiums has predictably failed to materialize. And of course, we now know that if you like your doctor and plan, there is no reason to think you can keep them. Which is one reason the law has not gotten any more popular since it passed. ...
"[...] The law is unpopular, not only with voters, but also apparently with the consumers who are supposed to buy insurance. The political forces that were supposed to guarantee its survival look weaker by the day. The Barack Obama administration is in emergency mode, pasting over political problems with administrative fixes of dubious legality, just to ensure the law’s bare survival -- which is now their incredibly low bar for 'success.'" |
|
| |
— Megan McArdle, Bloomberg
|
|
|
— Megan McArdle, Bloomberg
|
|
Posted January 22, 2014 • 08:29 AM
|
|
|
| |
On ObamaCare's Insurer Bailout: |
|
| |
"If a bill to eliminate the risk corridors comes to a vote, many congressional Democrats will decide that the success of their cherished health-care program is worth a bailout. But then they will face a choice: Do they really want to stand for an open-ended commitment of tax dollars to insurance companies? Is that what the party now favors? Is that what swing-state senators and swing-district representatives wish to defend?
"Conservatives, who almost all believe that Obamacare is a very bad law that can’t be made to work tolerably through mere tinkering, have every reason to fight a bailout. Campaigning against one will undermine the alliance between the White House and insurers by raising its price for both parties. Let’s find out just how much 'sustainability' that alliance has." |
|
| |
— Ramesh Ponnuru, National Review Senior Editor
|
|
|
— Ramesh Ponnuru, National Review Senior Editor
|
|
Posted January 21, 2014 • 08:05 AM
|
|
|
| |
On the Administration's Handling of the IRS Scandal: |
|
| |
"When Americans first learned last year that the IRS had illegally targeted Tea Party, conservative and evangelical nonprofits for harassment during the 2010 and 2012 campaigns, Obama said such activities were unacceptable and he promised to get to the bottom of the scandal. But not long afterwards, he began dismissing the IRS matter as a 'phony scandal' concocted by Republicans unhappy that he had won re-election.
"Then, Attorney General Eric Holder, or somebody reporting to him, appointed Barbara Bosserman, a long-time Obama campaign donor, to head the investigation. So it came as no surprise last week when it was reported that the FBI expects no criminal charges to be filed in the IRS scandal. Politicized justice is no justice at all.
"[...] The tragedy is that a man elected in large part because of his perceived integrity has turned out to be a political dissembler of the first rank." |
|
| |
— The Editors, Washington Examiner
|
|
|
— The Editors, Washington Examiner
|
|
Posted January 20, 2014 • 07:59 AM
|
|
|
| |
On the Senate Report on the Terrorist Attack in Benghazi, Libya: |
|
| |
"Terrorism: The bipartisan Senate report on the Benghazi attack is damning to both President Obama and ex-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. She may be sorry she asked, 'What difference does it make?' ...
"President Obama's appointment of Hillary Clinton as secretary of state was one of the most politicized choices in history, done to close ranks in his favor within the Democratic Party and give the former first lady a big boost for the 2016 presidential race. Both Obama and Clinton are now damned by this bipartisan report for their mismanagement and corruption.
"There is no excuse post-9/11 for either non-sharing of vital intelligence or security shortcomings at U.S. facilities in places swarming with terrorists. Yet, glaringly, Clinton is mentioned only a single time in the report.
"'What difference at this point does it make?' Clinton asked Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., nearly a year ago.
"The lives of four Americans serving their country, lost due to incompetence and politicization. That's what difference." |
|
| |
— The Editors, Investors Business Daily
|
|
|
— The Editors, Investors Business Daily
|
|
Posted January 17, 2014 • 08:09 AM
|
|
|
| |
On the New Jersey Bridge Scandal: |
|
| |
"There haven't been so many reporters chasing a story in Trenton, N.J., since Washington crossed the Delaware. But compared with the methods the Democratic Party is using now to take down its opponents, Chris Christie looks like Little Bo Peep. ...
"The Christie bonfire has burned for a week. In that same week, The Wall Street Journal reported that the FBI found nothing in the IRS's targeting of conservative political groups that warrants criminal charges. ...
"Thus, two of the most powerful public institutions in the U.S. — the FBI and the IRS — have concluded no harm, no foul, and the memory hole swallows the Obama administration's successful kneecapping of the GOP's most active members just as they prepared to participate in the 2012 presidential campaign. Many — ruined or terrified by the IRS probes — shut down. Mr. Obama won. |
|
| |
— Daniel Henninger, The Wall Street Journal
|
|
|
— Daniel Henninger, The Wall Street Journal
|
|
Posted January 16, 2014 • 07:48 AM
|
|
|
| |
On Drop in U.S. Economic Freedom Ranking: |
|
| |
"World economic freedom has reached record levels, according to the 2014 Index of Economic Freedom, released Tuesday by the Heritage Foundation and The Wall Street Journal. But after seven straight years of decline, the U.S. has dropped out of the top 10 most economically free countries.
"For 20 years, the index has measured a nation's commitment to free enterprise on a scale of 0 to 100 by evaluating 10 categories, including fiscal soundness, government size and property rights. These commitments have powerful effects: Countries achieving higher levels of economic freedom consistently and measurably outperform others in economic growth, long-term prosperity and social progress. ...
"It's not hard to see why the U.S. is losing ground. Even marginal tax rates exceeding 43% cannot finance runaway government spending, which has caused the national debt to skyrocket. The Obama administration continues to shackle entire sectors of the economy with regulation, including health care, finance and energy. The intervention impedes both personal freedom and national prosperity." |
|
| |
— Terry Miller, Heritage Foundation's Director of the Center for International Trade and Economics
|
|
|
— Terry Miller, Heritage Foundation's Director of the Center for International Trade and Economics
|
|
Posted January 15, 2014 • 07:58 AM
|
|
|
| |
On Media Coverage of the New Jersey Traffic Affair: |
|
| |
"While the creation of a traffic jam in a small New Jersey town shows the calloused ugliness too often found among political operators puffed up with their own power, this cannot compare with the threat to freedom when the Internal Revenue Service targets the administration's political opponents during an election year.
"Nor can a traffic jam compare with the Department of Justice's gun-running operation that led to the death of an American Border Patrol agent in the southwest or the State Department's actions and inactions that led to the deaths of four American officials killed by terrorists in Benghazi.
"Nevertheless, media coverage of the traffic jam in New Jersey was several times as extensive as any -- or all -- of these far more consequential scandals in Washington." |
|
| |
— Thomas Sowell, Economist, Author and Hoover Institution Senior Fellow
|
|
|
— Thomas Sowell, Economist, Author and Hoover Institution Senior Fellow
|
|
Posted January 14, 2014 • 08:02 AM
|
|
|
| |
On Buying Into Obamacare: |
|
| |
"The Obama administration is trying to persuade millions of uninterested, or perhaps reluctant, Americans to purchase health insurance through the Obamacare exchanges. But the heart of Obamacare is coercion. If Americans fail do what the law's Democratic authors believe is best, the federal government will punish them, through the progressively higher penalties of the individual mandate, until it hurts more not to buy coverage than it does to give up and purchase it.
"But what if many of those Americans rebel? Even if they know having health insurance is better than not having it, what if they refuse to be forced to buy the kind of coverage dictated by the government -- which may not really meet their needs -- at prices they don't want to pay? What then?
"'I don't think Obamacare can survive without people wanting to buy it,' Robert Laszewski, the respected health care analyst whose writings on Obamacare have become essential in recent months, told me in an email exchange recently." |
|
| |
— Byron York, The Washington Examiner Chief Political Correspondent
|
|
|
— Byron York, The Washington Examiner Chief Political Correspondent
|
|
Posted January 13, 2014 • 08:01 AM
|
|
|
| |
On How Times (and Political Scandals) Have Changed: |
|
| |
"They sure don’t make political scandals like they used to.
"In 1903, the sitting lieutenant governor of South Carolina shot and killed the editor of the state’s largest newspaper in broad daylight, in front of the State House. Jim Tillman believed the paper’s attacks cost him his bid for governor.
"He was acquitted in a trial controlled by his uncle — former governor and then U.S. Sen. 'Pitchfork Ben' Tillman. He literally got away with murder.
"Now that was a scandal.
"Yesterday Gov. Chris Christie held a 107-minute presser responding to a story about the politically motivated closure of several traffic lanes leading to the George Washington Bridge." |
|
| |
— Michael Graham, Boston Herald
|
|
|
— Michael Graham, Boston Herald
|
|
Posted January 10, 2014 • 08:06 AM
|
|
|
| |
On Walmart's Health Insurance Plans: |
|
| |
"New Obamacare health insurance enrollees may feel a pang of envy when they eye the coverage plans offered by Walmart to its employees.
"For many years, the giant discount retailer has been the target of unions and liberal activists who have harshly criticized the company's health care plans, calling them 'notorious for failing to provide health benefits' and 'substandard.'
"But a Washington Examiner comparison of the two health insurance programs found that Walmart's plan is more affordable and provides significantly better access to high-quality medical care than Obamacare."
|
|
| |
— Richard Pollock, The Washington Examiner Senior Watchdog Reporter
|
|
|
— Richard Pollock, The Washington Examiner Senior Watchdog Reporter
|
|
Posted January 09, 2014 • 08:02 AM
|
|
|
|