| |
On the Government's Secret Area 51: |
|
| |
"Newly declassified documents, obtained by George Washington University’s National Security Archive, appear to for the first time acknowledge the existence of Area 51. Hundreds of pages describe the genesis of the Nevada site that was home to the government’s spy plane program for decades. The documents do not, however, mention any aliens." |
|
| |
— Philip Bump, The Atlantic Wire
|
|
|
— Philip Bump, The Atlantic Wire
|
|
Posted August 16, 2013 • 07:59 AM
|
|
|
| |
On Opposition to Voter-ID Requirements: |
|
| |
"It is either the case that African Americans, young people, old people, and poor people labor under some onerous yet curiously undetectable burden that keeps them from obtaining free, government-issued photo IDs, or it is the case that Hillary Clinton, the NAACP, et al. are full of bunk when they claim that voter-ID laws such as the one just adopted in North Carolina amount to 'disenfranchisement.'
"The evidence strongly suggests the presence of ambient bunk levels approaching toxicity. In general, Americans are very handy when it comes to acquiring free things issued by the government, and none of the groups that Democrats list as targets for 'disenfranchisement' has shown itself disproportionately unskillful in doing so. ..." |
|
| |
— The Editors, National Review Online
|
|
|
— The Editors, National Review Online
|
|
Posted August 15, 2013 • 07:42 AM
|
|
|
| |
On ObamaCare's Congressional Exemption: |
|
| |
"If a regular citizen makes $100,000 a year working for a private company and loses his insurance because of ObamaCare, he must pay out of his pocket for the insurance he will be forced to purchase from the exchanges.
"However, if you are a sainted congressional staffer earning $100,000 a year and enter the exchanges, guess who picks up the tab for your new insurance plan? That’s right, your employer, the federal government, the lowly taxpayer.
"In other words, under ObamaCare, the only people forced into the exchanges whose insurance will still be paid for by their employer will be members of Congress and their staff." |
|
| |
— Charles Hurt, The Washington Times
|
|
|
— Charles Hurt, The Washington Times
|
|
Posted August 14, 2013 • 07:51 AM
|
|
|
| |
On Switching the U.S. to a Government-Run Medical System |
|
| |
"Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid admitted last week that ObamaCare was just a first move toward a fully government-run single-payer system. This should not be a surprise. Some of us knew it all along. ...
"Single-payer systems purport to offer universal access, but that's not exactly right. These systems have to ration care because there's no endless stream of cash to fund them. As Margaret Thatcher famously said, sooner or later socialist systems run out of other people's money." |
|
| |
— The Editors, Investors Business Daily
|
|
|
— The Editors, Investors Business Daily
|
|
Posted August 13, 2013 • 07:49 AM
|
|
|
| |
On the Budgetary Success of the Sequester: |
|
| |
"The biggest underreported story out of Washington this year is that the federal budget is shrinking and much more than anyone in either party expected. ...
"The sequester is squeezing the very programs liberals care most about — including the National Endowment for the Arts, green-energy subsidies, the Environmental Protection Agency and National Public Radio. Outside Washington, the sequester is forcing a fiscal retrenchment for such liberal special-interest groups as Planned Parenthood and the National Council of La Raza, which have grown dependent on government largess. ...
"Liberals had hoped that re-electing Mr. Obama, the most pro-spending president since LBJ, would unleash another four years of Great Society government expansion. Instead, spending caps and the sequester are squashing these progressive dreams. Welcome to the new fiscal reality in Washington. All Republicans need to do is enforce the budget laws Mr. Obama has already agreed to. Entitlement reforms will come when liberals realize that the unhappy alternative is to allow every program they cherish to keep shrinking." |
|
| |
— Stephen Moore, Wall Street Journal Editorial Board Member and Senior Economics Writer
|
|
|
— Stephen Moore, Wall Street Journal Editorial Board Member and Senior Economics Writer
|
|
Posted August 12, 2013 • 08:00 AM
|
|
|
| |
On Arming School Security Guards: |
|
| |
"[M]ost Americans with school-age children continue to say they would feel safer if their child attended a school with an armed guard and think the decision to put armed guards in the schools should be made by local government officials.
"A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 62% of Americans with children of elementary or secondary school age would feel safer if their child attended a school with an armed security guard. Just 24% say they would feel safer if their child went to a school where no adults were allowed to own a gun." |
|
| |
— Rasmussen Reports, Survey of 1,000 American Adults Conducted August 4-5, 2013
|
|
|
— Rasmussen Reports, Survey of 1,000 American Adults Conducted August 4-5, 2013
|
|
Posted August 09, 2013 • 07:51 AM
|
|
|
| |
On Slipping Down the NSA Database Slope: |
|
| |
"Earlier this week, we learned that other federal agencies — the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Justice, the Department of Defense, the Drug Enforcement Administration, the Internal Revenue Service, the CIA, the FBI — all want access to the NSA’s database, and it has shared some of it with most of them. Also this week, former Drug Enforcement Administration agents acknowledged the agency regularly receives raw data from the NSA and uses that data to commence criminal investigations, and claimed this has been going on for at least a decade.
"Down the slippery slope we go. ...
"What will the NSA spies seek next? Our passwords? We already know the answer to that one. They asked for them last week." |
|
| |
— Andrew P. Napolitano, Former New Jersey Superior Court Judge
|
|
|
— Andrew P. Napolitano, Former New Jersey Superior Court Judge
|
|
Posted August 08, 2013 • 07:57 AM
|
|
|
| |
On the Obama Administration’s Foreign Policy Lexicon: |
|
| |
“An evacuation is not an evacuation, it’s an ‘ordered departure’. (I would have thought that an ordered departure is what happens at National Airport every couple of hours when a plane takes off on time).
"A coup in Egypt isn’t a coup, it’s a ‘change in government.’
"The war in Afghanistan isn’t really a war, it's an 'overseas contingency operation.’
"What happened in Benghazi was not really a terror attack, it was a spontaneous riot – as the Secretary of State at the time says ‘What difference does it make?’
"This is the first administration in history ever to launch a lexicological war on the enemy. They’ve thrown the book at them – the dictionary – and it really isn’t enough.” |
|
| |
— Charles Krauthammer, Syndicated Columnist
|
|
|
— Charles Krauthammer, Syndicated Columnist
|
|
Posted August 07, 2013 • 07:46 AM
|
|
|
| |
On Controlling and Limiting Government Surveillance: |
|
| |
"Here is a practical reason conservatives especially should be concerned about the national security state. People who work for the government, including inevitably those who work in national security, will not decide their powers are too broad. They can’t — they’re focused on a real foe, they have a mission and it tends to leave them in time thinking their powers aren’t broad enough. They will not declare they need more civilian control or oversight — those dizzy, self-serving politicians just gum up the works. They will not decide to limit their use of the capabilities at their fingertips, especially when the stakes seem so high.
"It is up to the people in the country, to citizens, to control and limit government surveillance, to the extent they can and in accord with true national-security needs." |
|
| |
— Peggy Noonan, The Wall Street Journal
|
|
|
— Peggy Noonan, The Wall Street Journal
|
|
Posted August 06, 2013 • 08:00 AM
|
|
|
| |
On Uncovering the Truth About Benghazi: |
|
| |
"If there is no scandal concerning the events that led to Benghazi and its aftermath, there certainly appears to be something that resembles a cover up going on about it. The White House needs to drop the politicized refrain about 'phony scandals' and start treating this issue seriously. It should direct the CIA to start answering questions from the Congress. The sooner it does, the better it will be for the president once we find out — as we inevitably will — what it is that they are trying to keep secret." |
|
| |
— Jonathan S. Tobin, Commentary Magazine Senior Online Editor
|
|
|
— Jonathan S. Tobin, Commentary Magazine Senior Online Editor
|
|
Posted August 05, 2013 • 08:09 AM
|
|
|
|