| |
On the Fight Against ObamaCare: |
|
| |
"Ted Cruz and Mike Lee may not have been able to strike a death blow to ObamaCare today, but they were able to fight a fight that would have been impossible before them. They have now made it less and less possible for Republicans to collaborate with Democrats to fix or stabilize ObamaCare. ...
"Grassroots upset about this fight should be encouraged. We’d have never gotten this far with the GOP before 2010. Imagine now the possibilities in 2014 if we make examples of a GOP that refused to fight ObamaCare.
"2014 must now be about advancing, ever advancing, even through the ranks of the GOP to have the fights that must be had." |
|
| |
— Erick Erickson, RedState Editor
|
|
|
— Erick Erickson, RedState Editor
|
|
Posted October 17, 2013 • 07:50 AM
|
|
|
| |
On Which Political Party is More Extreme: |
|
| |
"Which party is more extreme?
"A Republican Party divided between 180 mainstream House members and 40 Ted Cruz mini-me's? Or a Democratic Party united to preserve our fossilized, ineffective public sector?
"A Republican Party advocating a path to fresh, natural, economic growth? Or a Democratic Party offering young voters the outdated economics of conformity, artificially imposed by Washington's elites?
"A Republican Party being driven to offer change? Or a Democratic Party united against it?
"Entrepreneurs, start printing tie-died shirts now. They will be hot sellers at the next Democratic Convention. Both sides are in for an interesting ride, but for Democrats, it's going to be an extreme 2016." |
|
| |
— Alex Castellanos, Republican Strategist, Purple Strategies and NewRepublican.org Founder
|
|
|
— Alex Castellanos, Republican Strategist, Purple Strategies and NewRepublican.org Founder
|
|
Posted October 16, 2013 • 07:46 AM
|
|
|
| |
On the ObamaCare Website Crash: |
|
| |
"A growing consensus of IT experts, outside and inside the government, have figured out a principal reason why the website for Obamacare’s federally-sponsored insurance exchange is crashing. Healthcare.gov forces you to create an account and enter detailed personal information before you can start shopping. This, in turn, creates a massive traffic bottleneck, as the government verifies your information and decides whether or not you’re eligible for subsidies. HHS bureaucrats knew this would make the website run more slowly. But they were more afraid that letting people see the underlying cost of Obamacare’s insurance plans would scare people away.
"'Healthcare.gov was initially going to include an option to browse before registering,' report Christopher Weaver and Louise Radnofsky in the Wall Street Journal. 'But that tool was delayed, people familiar with the situation said.' Why was it delayed? 'An HHS spokeswoman said the agency wanted to ensure that users were aware of their eligibility for subsidies that could help pay for coverage, before they started seeing the prices of policies.' (Emphasis added.)" |
|
| |
— Avik Roy, Forbes Contributor
|
|
|
— Avik Roy, Forbes Contributor
|
|
Posted October 15, 2013 • 07:52 AM
|
|
|
| |
On the Health Care Job Market: |
|
| |
"In another bit of grim news for the long-term prosperity of these United States, hospitals, medical practices, and related businesses are shedding jobs: 8,000 of them since April, more than in any other sector. For the year, there have been more than 41,000 layoffs at health-care firms. As Paul Davidson and Barbara Hansen of USA Today report, those are mostly hospital staffing reductions in response to reduced reimbursement rates for Medicare patients under the sequester and cuts for some providers under the Affordable Care Act. Private insurers, who are starting to experience a burning sensation after having gone to bed with the devil on Obamacare, are reducing payments, too." |
|
| |
— Kevin D. Williamson, National Review
|
|
|
— Kevin D. Williamson, National Review
|
|
Posted October 14, 2013 • 08:17 AM
|
|
|
| |
On President Obama and Congressional Republicans: |
|
| |
"For all the hyped indignation over GOP 'anarchism,' there has been remarkable media reticence about the president’s intransigence. He has refused to negotiate anything unless the Republicans fully fund the government and raise the debt ceiling — unconditionally.
"For all his protestations about protecting the full faith and credit of the United States — jittery markets are showing that his brinkmanship could have precisely the opposite effect — the president’s real intent is to score a humiliating victory over the GOP." |
|
| |
— Charles Krauthammer, Syndicated Columnist
|
|
|
— Charles Krauthammer, Syndicated Columnist
|
|
Posted October 11, 2013 • 07:57 AM
|
|
|
| |
On ObamaCare's Launch Failure: |
|
| |
"It’s been one full week since the flagship technology portion of the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) went live. And since that time, the befuddled beast that is Healthcare.gov has shutdown, crapped out, stalled, and mis-loaded so consistently that its track record for failure is challenged only by Congress.
"The site itself, which apparently underwent major code renovations over the weekend, still rejects user logins, fails to load drop-down menus and other crucial components for users that successfully gain entrance, and otherwise prevents uninsured Americans in the 36 states it serves from purchasing healthcare at competitive rates – Healthcare.gov’s primary purpose. The site is so busted that, as of a couple days ago, the number of people that successfully purchased healthcare through it was in the 'single digits,' according to the Washington Post.
"The reason for this nationwide headache apparently stems from poorly written code, which buckled under the heavy influx of traffic that its engineers and administrators should have seen coming. But the fact that Healthcare.gov can’t do the one job it was built to do isn’t the most infuriating part of this debacle – it’s that we, the taxpayers, seem to have forked up more than $634 million of the federal purse to build the digital equivalent of a rock." |
|
| |
— Andrew Couts, Staff Writer for Digital Trends
|
|
|
— Andrew Couts, Staff Writer for Digital Trends
|
|
Posted October 10, 2013 • 08:25 AM
|
|
|
| |
On Monumental Civil Disobedience: |
|
| |
"Could this be the end of Monument Syndrome? Across the country, ordinary Americans are rising up in revolt against the old Washington tactic of closing public parks and memorials during selective government 'shutdowns' to score political points. Tax-paying tourists are tossing off the orange traffic cones and 'Barrycades.' Enough is enough. ...
"Welcome to Occupy America. It's a protest movement for all ages against Washington business as usual. Thanks to social media, citizens outside the Beltway are now able to voice their disgust in an unprecedented way. Through Twitter, Facebook and blogs, they are directly disrupting the well-worn politics of government parks-and-wreck extortion." |
|
| |
— Michelle Malkin, Syndicated Columnist
|
|
|
— Michelle Malkin, Syndicated Columnist
|
|
Posted October 09, 2013 • 07:48 AM
|
|
|
| |
On Selling a Bill of Goods on Health Care Reform: |
|
| |
"As a candidate for president, Barack Obama sold his signature universal health care plan with the promise that it would 'cut the cost of a typical family's premium by up to $2,500 a year.'
"Now that the Affordable Care Act exchanges are open for business, voters are finding that the biggest problem with ObamacCare is not that some websites crashed last week but that the Obama promise of big savings for the average family was too good to be true.
"Now that the exchanges are open for business, people who already have individual coverage have something new not to like: sticker shock. The Affordable Care Act isn't affordable after all. ...
"Voters never should have believed that Washington could offer more health care benefits to more people and that it would end up saving families thousands of dollars. It was too good to be true, and now the bill is coming due." |
|
| |
— Debra J. Saunders, San Francisco Chronicle Syndicated Columnist
|
|
|
— Debra J. Saunders, San Francisco Chronicle Syndicated Columnist
|
|
Posted October 08, 2013 • 08:30 AM
|
|
|
| |
On Key GOP ObamaCare Message Points: |
|
| |
"Congressional Republicans ought to memorize, and preface their every statement with, some simple formula. 'One: Make Congress and the White House obey the same ObamaCare rules you do. Two: Obama let business off for a year; we want workers to be let off for a year too. That’s the GOP plan. What part don’t you like?'
"Only by hitting the nail on the head again and again and again will Republicans be heard. If you’re locked in a closet at the far end of a deep basement, you need to bang on the door and shout, and keep banging and keep shouting until someone hears you. Subtlety and nuance are not required — only simplicity and persistence. The guy locked in the closet has a strong message, and so does the House GOP. But if no one hears, no one cares." |
|
| |
— David Gelernter, Yale Professor of Computer Science,
Weekly Standard Contributing Editor and Former AEI National Fellow
|
|
|
— David Gelernter, Yale Professor of Computer Science,
Weekly Standard Contributing Editor and Former AEI National Fellow
|
|
Posted October 07, 2013 • 07:52 AM
|
|
|
| |
On Who is Responsible for the Government Shutdown: |
|
| |
"The hundreds of thousands of government workers who have been laid off are not idle because the House of Representatives did not vote enough money to pay their salaries or the other expenses of their agencies -- unless they are in an agency that would administer ObamaCare. ...
"The Senate chose not to vote to authorize that money to be spent, because it did not include money for ObamaCare. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid says that he wants a 'clean' bill from the House of Representatives, and some in the media keep repeating the word 'clean' like a mantra. But what is unclean about not giving Harry Reid everything he wants?
"If Senator Reid and President Obama refuse to accept the money required to run the government, because it leaves out the money they want to run ObamaCare, that is their right. But that is also their responsibility." |
|
| |
— Thomas Sowell, Economist, Author and Hoover Institution Senior Fellow
|
|
|
— Thomas Sowell, Economist, Author and Hoover Institution Senior Fellow
|
|
Posted October 04, 2013 • 08:29 AM
|
|
|
|