Democrats hope to press the "affordability" issue in this year's midterm election season, but there'…
CFIF on X CFIF on YouTube
Inflation: Comparing Trump and Biden...

Democrats hope to press the "affordability" issue in this year's midterm election season, but there's one potentially glaring problem for them, as illustrated by our friends at Unleash Prosperity... Biden Versus Trump on Inflation

 …[more]

August 17, 2026 • 04:40 PM
CFIF’s latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Sign Up
Notable Quotes
 
On U.S. Efforts to Buy Influence in Afghanistan:
 
 

"KABUL, Afghanistan — For more than a decade, wads of American dollars packed into suitcases, backpacks and, on occasion, plastic shopping bags have been dropped off every month or so at the offices of Afghanistan’s president — courtesy of the Central Intelligence Agency. 

"All told, tens of millions of dollars have flowed from the C.I.A. to the office of President Hamid Karzai, according to current and former advisers to the Afghan leader. ... 

"[T]here is little evidence that the payments bought the influence the C.I.A. sought. Instead, some American officials said, the cash has fueled corruption and empowered warlords, undermining Washington’s exit strategy from Afghanistan."

 
 
— Matthew Rosenberg, The New York Times
— Matthew Rosenberg, The New York Times
Posted April 29, 2013 • 07:57 AM
 
 
On Passing Immigration Reform Before Securing the Border:
 
 

"Waiting until the border has already been secured before an immigration policy is decided upon would also allow time to discuss the pros and cons of various ways of enforcing whatever that policy might turn out to be. But many politicians much prefer to rush complex legislation through Congress before the public knows what is in it or what is at stake. 'We the people' are to be by-passed. ... 

"Ask yourself why people who have been living illegally in this country for years cannot wait a couple of more years until the border is secured before the question of their legal status can be studied and debated in Congress and among the public at large. ... 

"'Comprehensive' immigration reform serves the interests of politicians who like to be on both sides of a controversial issue, and it serves the interests of those foreigners who want to game the system in the United States, at the expense of the American people. But it does not serve the interests of American society."

 
 
— Thomas Sowell, Economist, Author and Hoover Institution Senior Fellow
— Thomas Sowell, Economist, Author and Hoover Institution Senior Fellow
Posted April 26, 2013 • 07:51 AM
 
 
On Reconsidering Former President George W. Bush:
 
 

"The Washington Post/ABC poll asked respondents to rate Bush’s performance for the first time since December 2008, when only 33 percent rated it positively and 66 percent rated it negatively. What the pollster found is that today 47 percent approve and 50 percent disapprove of Bush’s performance. That approval number is precisely the same as Barack Obama’s in the most recent Post/ABC poll. ... 

"The Post/ABC poll suggests that Americans have been developing a more well-rounded assessment of Bush’s stewardship, even as he has remained mostly silent in public. Some presidents’ reputations rise as they move into history. Harry Truman, reviled when he left office, was recognized later for getting the big decisions right despite some obvious mistakes. The same thing seems to be happening, more quickly, with George W. Bush."

 
 
— Michael Barone, Washington Examiner Senior Political Analyst
— Michael Barone, Washington Examiner Senior Political Analyst
Posted April 25, 2013 • 07:45 AM
 
 
On False Travel Frustrations of Sequestration:
 
 

"As travellers nationwide are learning, the White House has decided to express its dislike of the sequester -- otherwise known as modestly smaller government -- by choosing to cut basic air traffic control services. ... 

"The White House claims the sequester applies to the budget category known as 'projects, programs and activities' and thus it lacks flexibility. Not so: This is a political pose to make the sequester more disruptive. Legally speaking, the sequester applies at a more general level known as 'accounts.' The air traffic account includes 15,000 controllers out of 31,000 employees. The White House could keep the controllers on duty simply by allocating more furlough days to these other non-essential workers. ...   

"All of this deserves to backfire, and it will if Republicans break from their circular immigration firing squads and explain what Mr. Obama is doing. For all of its rough edges, the sequester is proving to be educational. It is showing Americans how broken so much of government is, and it is revealing how our politicians refuse to distinguish between essential services and needless waste."

 
 
— The Editors, The Wall Street Journal
— The Editors, The Wall Street Journal
Posted April 24, 2013 • 08:04 AM
 
 
On Amnesty in the Senate Immigration Bill:
 
 

"[T]he legislation’s most critical amnesty comes right away, before even the pretense of beefed-up security. Illegal aliens will get their illegal status removed six months after the bill is passed upon payment of $500. The formerly illegal aliens will be allowed to remain in the country legally, under so-called 'probationary status,' for ten years (while those who wish to enter the country legally wait patiently in their home countries for permission to enter). This lawful presence is virtually everything that most would-be illegal aliens hope for, since few cross the border with any desire to become U.S. citizens."

 
 
— Heather Mac Donald, Manhattan Institute John M. Olin Fellow and City Journal Contributing Editor
— Heather Mac Donald, Manhattan Institute John M. Olin Fellow and City Journal Contributing Editor
Posted April 23, 2013 • 08:13 AM
 
 
On Polishing the Public Image of ObamaCare:
 
 

"The Department of Health and Human Services has just handed out a $3.1 million PR contract to improve the public image of Obamacare. ... 

"Obama officials insist the ads won’t be political, but critics recall that just before the 2010 midterm election, HHS spent $3.2 million on 'educational' TV ads praising Obamacare. ... 

"At no point since its passage has Obamacare been viewed favorably by more than 45 percent of voters, and the latest Kaiser Family Health Foundation poll pegs its nationwide support at only 37 percent."

 
 
— John Fund, National Review Online National-Affairs Columnist
— John Fund, National Review Online National-Affairs Columnist
Posted April 22, 2013 • 08:07 AM
 
 
On Sequestration's Effect on Pork-Barrel Spending:
 
 

"Imagine what the media reaction would be if in the aftermath of yesterday’s Senate vote blocking new background checks, a leading official of the gun lobby had explained his side’s success by saying: 'Bribery isn’t what it once was. The government has no money. Once upon a time you would throw somebody a post office or a research facility in times like this. Frankly, there's not a lot of leverage.' Washington would be in full outrage mode, and there would be demands to find out who had made such an offensive claim.

"Of course, no such pro-gun official has said any such thing. ...
 
"If the pro-gun-control official cited in Politico is right, the current government sequester is working — Washington has less money for bribes. The spending spree that liberals (in both parties) have luxuriated in over the past decade has had a perverse side effect: People used to having their pockets lined turn a cold shoulder when the cash flow slows down."

 
 
— John Fund, National Review Online National-Affairs Columnist
— John Fund, National Review Online National-Affairs Columnist
Posted April 19, 2013 • 08:07 AM
 
 
On the Defeat of Gun Control Legislation:
 
 

"The president raged. The mayor of New York frothed. Joe Biden cried. But at the end of the day, common sense prevailed. The Senate killed the effort to unreasonably expand background checks for buyers of guns.
 
"The measure is not quite graveyard dead; it can be brought up again, but prospects for that are remote. The vote was a bone-jarring setback for the gun-control lobby, and a decisive victory for the National Rifle Association (NRA), which led the fight to protect the rights of all. It was most of all a resounding victory for the plain and simple language of the Second Amendment to the Constitution, 'A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.'"

 
 
— The Editors, The Washington Times
— The Editors, The Washington Times
Posted April 18, 2013 • 08:16 AM
 
 
On the Manchin-Toomey Gun Control Legislation:
 
 

"The Senate will vote Wednesday afternoon on what could be the biggest changes in U.S. gun laws in nearly 20 years. 
 
"Senators will take up the proposal from Sens. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) and Pat Toomey (R-Pa.) to expand background checks on firearm purchases and close the so-called gun show loophole. The bipartisan plan is likely the strongest gun control bill that can pass this Congress, although it’s far weaker than the White House and many Democrats hoped for. ... 

"Voting on the Manchin-Toomey proposal is scheduled to begin at 4 p.m., and both opponents and supporters say the margin is razor thin at this point."

 
 
— John Bresnahan, Politico Senior Congressional Reporter
— John Bresnahan, Politico Senior Congressional Reporter
Posted April 17, 2013 • 08:02 AM
 
 
On the Boston Marathon Bombings:
 
 

"Once again, innocent American citizens going about their business on American soil have been targeted for attack. On a Marathon Monday in spring, Boston joined the grim roll of American cities and sites bloodied by terror: New York, Washington, Oklahoma City, Shanksville, Ft. Hood and so on. And it’s not over, given that the numbers of dead and wounded continue to mount.  

"The question on every American mind yesterday was the obvious one: Who? 

"Looking back at how wrong speculation has proved before in attacks from the DC sniper to the Times Square bomber, it’s worth waiting for the facts to come in. Better to place our confidence in the men and women in our law-enforcement and intelligence agencies. So long as they are allowed to do their jobs, we have no doubt that they will find out the truth of these attacks."

 
 
— The Editors, New York Post
— The Editors, New York Post
Posted April 16, 2013 • 07:38 AM
 
Notable Quote   
 
"The clock is ticking on the upcoming congressional election. House and Senate Republicans are facing some rough headwinds in these final days, including the president's negative job approval and their slippage with voters on the question of who can better handle economic issues. There may not be many cards left for the GOP to play, even with their cash advantages.But in all the talk of a blue wave…[more]
 
 
— David Winston, President of The Winston Group and a Longtime Adviser to Congressional Republicans
 
Liberty Poll   

Considering the exceptionally hostile mid-term elections rhetoric and activity, does that make you at all reluctant to vote in person?