Democrats hope to press the "affordability" issue in this year's midterm election season, but there'…
CFIF on X CFIF on YouTube
Inflation: Comparing Trump and Biden...

Democrats hope to press the "affordability" issue in this year's midterm election season, but there's one potentially glaring problem for them, as illustrated by our friends at Unleash Prosperity... Biden Versus Trump on Inflation

 …[more]

August 17, 2026 • 04:40 PM
CFIF’s latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Sign Up
Notable Quotes
 
On Republican Candidates and Political Consultants:
 
 

"If there was any villain at the just-completed Conservative Political Action Conference, it was the generic figure of the Republican political consultant.  Overpaid, unprincipled, always on the lookout for the next client — or easy mark — the consultants, to listen to a number of CPAC speakers, have helped bring the Republican Party to its current low state. ... 

"So yes, Republicans should look at the way they run their campaigns, and who they hire to do the work.  But in the long run, winning candidates win and losers lose, regardless of who the consultant is.  A good candidate has deeply-felt beliefs that guide how he runs — and how he chooses and uses campaign help.  At the moment, the Republican Party has far, far bigger problems than its consultant class."

 
 
— Byron York, The Washington Examiner Chief Political Correspondent
— Byron York, The Washington Examiner Chief Political Correspondent
Posted March 18, 2013 • 08:13 AM
 
 
On Presidential Leadership and the War on Terror:
 
 

"George W. Bush was excoriated for waterboarding exactly three terrorists, all of whom are now enjoying an extensive retirement on a sunny Caribbean island (though strolls beyond Gitmo’s gates are prohibited). Whereas President Obama, with thousands of kills to his name, evokes little protest from yesterday’s touch-not-a-hair-on-their-head zealots. Of whom, of course, Sen. Obama was a leading propagandist. 

"Such hypocrisy is the homage Democrats pay to Republicans when the former take office, confront national security reality, feel the weight of their duty to protect the nation — and end up doing almost everything they had denounced their predecessors for doing. The beauty of such hypocrisy, however, is that the rotation of power creates a natural bipartisan consensus on the proper conduct of this war."

 
 
— Charles Krauthammer, Syndicated Columnist
— Charles Krauthammer, Syndicated Columnist
Posted March 15, 2013 • 07:52 AM
 
 
On the Democrats' Tax and Spend Budget Plan:
 
 

"The 10-year budget plan drafted by Senate Democrats includes a $1.5 trillion tax-hike, according to GOP staffers who combed through the long document as soon as it was released. 
 
"The 'budget would raise taxes on Americans by $1.5 trillion to pay for increased spending … on top of the $1.7 trillion in tax increases already signed into law during the Obama administration,' said a statement from Sen. John Thune, the chairman of the Senate Republican Conference. ... 

"President Barack Obama quickly endorsed the plan ..."

 
 
— Neil Munro, The Daily Caller White House Correspondent
— Neil Munro, The Daily Caller White House Correspondent
Posted March 14, 2013 • 08:00 AM
 
 
On House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan's 2014 Budget Proposal:
 
 

"The political class seems to be scandalized that Paul Ryan had the cheek Tuesday to propose another reform budget. Doesn't the House Budget Chairman understand that the 2012 election settled every political question in President Obama's favor? 

"Er, no. The federal fisc is still a shambles — despite the tax increase on millionaires and billionaires that Mr. Obama said would solve everything and despite the modest sequester spending cuts he says are too painful to abide. Thus Mr. Ryan's proposal for fiscal 2014 is still an important document, even if it has no chance of becoming law this year, because it reaches for that elusive thing in Washington — realistic solutions to the country's problems."

 
 
— The Editors, The Wall Street Journal
— The Editors, The Wall Street Journal
Posted March 13, 2013 • 07:43 AM
 
 
On NYC Mayor Bloomberg's Soda-Size Prohibition:
 
 

"Bootleggers can stand down: Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Milton Tingling took the fizz out of Mayor Bloomberg’s prohibition on sweetened beverages in containers larger than 16 ounces yesterday — just hours before the ban was to kick in. 

"And here we had visions of a new black market, served by canvas-covered convoys crossing the Mexican border smuggling caseloads of two-liter Coke. Or perhaps the terror group Hezbollah would capitalize on it, possibly via Indian reservations, as it’s been accused of doing with high-taxed smokes.

"OK, maybe a black market for large sodas might not have been necessary in New York. That’s because, as Tingling noted, the ban itself created enough loopholes to defeat its own purpose. Which is partly why he struck it down."

 
 
— The Editors, The New York Post
— The Editors, The New York Post
Posted March 12, 2013 • 07:52 AM
 
 
On Gun Control and the 2014 Midterms:
 
 

"If there’s one issue that Democrats worry could become sticky in 2014 races, it’s gun control. While party strategists believe that the president’s forceful advocacy of immigration reform and gay marriage tracks with shifts in public opinion, opposition to new restrictions on guns is palpable in many conservative pockets of the country. 

"'In some of those conservative to moderate districts, the gun debate is a real challenge for Democratic candidates,' said Andrew Myers, a Democratic pollster who advises many candidates in conservative states. 

"More broadly, some Democrats worry that Obama’s liberal tack will have the effect of reinvigorating Republican voters at a time when the GOP is still trying to lift itself off the mat from the disastrous 2012 election."

 
 
— Alex Isenstadt, Politico
— Alex Isenstadt, Politico
Posted March 11, 2013 • 08:02 AM
 
 
On the Right to Self-Defense:
 
 

"In all the noise caused by the Obama administration's direct assault on the right of every person to keep and bear arms, the essence of the issue has been drowned out. The president and his big-government colleagues want you to believe that only the government can keep you free and safe, so to them, the essence of this debate is about obedience to law. 

"To those who have killed innocents among us, obedience to law is the last of their thoughts. And to those who believe that the Constitution means what it says, the essence of this debate is not about the law; it is about personal liberty in a free society. It is the exercise of this particular personal liberty -- the freedom to defend yourself when the police cannot or will not and the freedom to use weapons to repel tyrants if they take over the government -- that the big-government crowd fears the most."

 
 
— Judge Andrew Napolitano, Conservative Columnist and Political Commentator
— Judge Andrew Napolitano, Conservative Columnist and Political Commentator
Posted March 08, 2013 • 07:31 AM
 
 
On Declining Household Incomes:
 
 

"Data released by the Commerce Department last week showed that personal income fell 3.6% in January, the biggest decline in 20 years. The drop was even bigger when taxes and inflation are taken into account. Real personal disposable income fell by 4%, the biggest monthly drop in half a century. ... 

"What this means is that the U.S. economy is not merely recovering from the recession more slowly than one might like, but is actually getting worse for many Americans. Despite three-and-a-half years of uninterrupted growth in real GDP and a decline of more than two percentage points in the unemployment rate since 2009, the standard of living is falling for as much as half the population, particularly if you look beyond monthly numbers to longer-term trends."

 
 
— Michael Sivy, Chartered Financial Analyst and Former Securities Analyst
— Michael Sivy, Chartered Financial Analyst and Former Securities Analyst
Posted March 07, 2013 • 07:44 AM
 
 
On ObamaCare's Predictable Problems:
 
 

"Despite President Obama’s promise that his plan would not add 'one dime' to the deficit, the Government Accountability Office announced last week that it would more likely add 62,000,000,000,000 dimes (or $6.2 trillion) over 75 years.

"Obama also promised that 'if you like your health-care plan, you can keep your health-care plan.' Estimates for how many Americans will lose their existing plans vary. The CBO says 5 million to 20 million. The consulting firm McKinsey & Co. says about 30 percent of employers will push workers onto the public system.
 
"Even the AFL-CIO and the Teamsters have started to freak out over the gold-plated benefits many of their members will lose, thanks to the guy they helped reelect."

 
 
— Jonah Goldberg, National Review Online Editor-at-Large
— Jonah Goldberg, National Review Online Editor-at-Large
Posted March 06, 2013 • 08:17 AM
 
 
On the Selection of Gina McCarthy to Head the EPA:
 
 

"President Obama gave his second-term global warming agenda a lot more definition Monday with a new Environmental Protection Agency chief to replace Lisa Jackson. Picking Gina McCarthy, one of her top lieutenants and the architect of some of the agency's most destructive carbon rules, is a sign he intends to make good on his vow of 'executive actions' if Congress doesn't pass cap and tax.

"Over the last four years running the EPA's air office, Ms. McCarthy has been a notably willful regulator, even for this Administration. Her promotion is another way of saying that Mr. Obama has given up getting Congress to agree to his anticarbon agenda, especially given the number of Senate Democrats from coal or oil states. The real climate fight now is over the shape of forthcoming rules that could be released as early as this summer, and a brutal under-the-table lobbying campaign is now underway. ... 

"Lately Mr. Obama has been going around saying that the problem is that he's a President, not an 'emperor' or 'dictator,' but on carbon regulation this is a distinction without much difference. Ms. McCarthy has been integral in abusing laws that were written decades ago in order to achieve climate goals that Congress has rejected, all with little or no political debate. Someone should ask her about her antidemocratic politics at her confirmation hearings."

 
 
— The Editors, The Wall Street Journal
— The Editors, The Wall Street Journal
Posted March 05, 2013 • 07:51 AM
 
Notable Quote   
 
"The clock is ticking on the upcoming congressional election. House and Senate Republicans are facing some rough headwinds in these final days, including the president's negative job approval and their slippage with voters on the question of who can better handle economic issues. There may not be many cards left for the GOP to play, even with their cash advantages.But in all the talk of a blue wave…[more]
 
 
— David Winston, President of The Winston Group and a Longtime Adviser to Congressional Republicans
 
Liberty Poll   

Considering the exceptionally hostile mid-term elections rhetoric and activity, does that make you at all reluctant to vote in person?