| |
On Holding Holder in Contempt: |
|
| |
"'Contempt of Congress' is a pretty strong term, and one with tangible legal consequences, but how else to describe Attorney General Eric Holder’s continuing obstructionism in the burgeoning Fast and Furious scandal? ...
"For months now, Holder has been dodging, obfuscating, withholding evidence and outright lying in his attempt to evade responsibility for the deadly program that has cost the lives of two federal agents and countless Mexican nationals.
"Contempt of Congress? Contempt for the American people is more like it." |
|
| |
— Michael A. Walsh, New York Post
|
|
|
— Michael A. Walsh, New York Post
|
|
Posted February 16, 2012 • 08:00 AM
|
|
|
| |
On the DOJ Taking the Prize for Remaining Silent: |
|
| |
"The Justice Department, beating fierce competition from the CIA, the Department of Homeland Security and others, has won this year’s coveted Rosemary Award, named for President Nixon’s secretary Rose Mary Woods, who somehow erased 18 1/2 minutes of a crucial Watergate tape.
"The seventh annual award, presented by the George Washington University-based National Security Archive, honors the agency that has done the very most in the last year to enhance government secrecy and keep the public in the dark." |
|
| |
— Al Kamen, Writing ‘In the Loop’ for The Washington Post
|
|
|
— Al Kamen, Writing ‘In the Loop’ for The Washington Post
|
|
Posted February 15, 2012 • 07:34 AM
|
|
|
| |
On the President's Proposed 2013 Budget: |
|
| |
"President Obama’s fourth budget promises a fourth straight year of trillion-dollar deficits, a fourth straight year of masking new spending with lame gimmickry, and a fourth straight year of asking Congress to yoke the American people with a historically massive tax hike. It is a budget with all the courage and resolve of an intentional walk, and just in time for spring training.
"It is a budget that spends a staggering $47 trillion over ten years and capitulates to the inevitability of a national debt larger than the national economy, assuring that by 2022 our interest payments alone will reach $1 trillion a year. It is a budget that hikes income, estate, and other taxes by $1.9 trillion over ten years, and uses that revenue not to reduce the deficit or shore up our existing entitlement commitments but on a raft of new stimuli that are as substantively dubious as they are politically opportunistic.
"It is a budget that claims $4 trillion in deficit reduction through a series of cheap tricks that don’t stand up to even the gentlest of scrutiny. ... " |
|
| |
— The Editors, National Review OnLine
|
|
|
— The Editors, National Review OnLine
|
|
Posted February 14, 2012 • 07:41 AM
|
|
|
| |
On Warren Buffett’s Support for Higher Taxes: |
|
| |
"The bottom line is simple. When people get rich by providing goods and services in a competitive market, that’s capitalism. When they get rich because of subsidies, bailouts, preferences, and handouts provided by the ruling class, that’s Argentina.
"I have no idea whether Buffett is corrupt, but I know he is benefiting from a corrupt system. So it’s understandable that people like me suspect that his endorsement of higher taxes is not because of a mistaken view of fiscal policy, but rather because he wants to do something nice for the politicians who rig the rules to give him more wealth." |
|
| |
— Daniel J. Mitchell, Cato Institute Senior Fellow
|
|
|
— Daniel J. Mitchell, Cato Institute Senior Fellow
|
|
Posted February 13, 2012 • 08:17 AM
|
|
|
| |
On President Obama and the Culture of Dependency: |
|
| |
"Someone needs to ask Mr. Obama how an increasingly impoverished nation, limping along on food stamps and housing subsidies, is going to pay for the existing beneficiaries, along with 77 million Baby Boomers set to retire in the next 25 years. A president who has impaired the vibrancy of the private sector so badly has long since forfeited the moral high ground." |
|
| |
— Mona Charen, Nationally Syndicated Columnist
|
|
|
— Mona Charen, Nationally Syndicated Columnist
|
|
Posted February 10, 2012 • 07:59 AM
|
|
|
| |
On ObamaCare's Birth-Control Mandate: |
|
| |
"The political furor over President Obama's birth-control mandate continues to grow, even among those for whom contraception poses no moral qualms, and one needn't be a theologian to understand why. The country is being exposed to the raw political control that is the core of the Obama health-care plan, and Americans are seeing clearly for the first time how this will violate pluralism and liberty. ...
"The White House is now trying to cauterize the political damage and saying it is open to some 'compromise' on its own contraception decision. But the rule is already final. HHS tried to sell it as a compromise when it was announced, and in any case HHS would revive this coercion whenever it is politically convenient some time in Mr. Obama's second term. Religious liberty won't be protected from the entitlement state until ObamaCare is repealed." |
|
| |
— The Editors, The Wall Street Journal
|
|
|
— The Editors, The Wall Street Journal
|
|
Posted February 09, 2012 • 07:45 AM
|
|
|
| |
On Rick Santorum's 3-State Sweep: |
|
| |
"DENVER—Rick Santorum jolted the Republican presidential race Tuesday with a three-state sweep of nominating contests in Colorado, Missouri and Minnesota, puncturing Mitt Romney's claim to be the unstoppable front-runner.
"Mr. Santorum's three victories—one in the Mountain West and two in the Midwest—give his campaign a much-needed burst of momentum while stirring doubt about Mr. Romney's abilities to woo conservatives to his side in important electoral swing states such as Missouri and Colorado. ..." |
|
| |
— Neil King, Jr. and Danny Yadron, The Wall Street Journal
|
|
|
— Neil King, Jr. and Danny Yadron, The Wall Street Journal
|
|
Posted February 08, 2012 • 07:55 AM
|
|
|
| |
On a Fairness Quiz for President Obama: |
|
| |
"President Obama has frequently justified his policies—and judged their outcomes—in terms of equity, justice and fairness. That raises an obvious question: How does our existing system—and his own policy record—stack up according to those criteria? ...
"Is it fair that American corporations pay the highest statutory corporate tax rate of all other industrialized nations but Japan, which cuts its rate on April 1? ...
"Is it fair that after the first three years of Obamanomics, the poor are poorer, the poverty rate is rising, the middle class is losing income, and some 5.5 million fewer Americans have jobs today than in 2007? ...
"Is it fair that wind, solar and ethanol producers get billions of dollars of subsidies each year and pay virtually no taxes, while the oil and gas industry—which provides at least 10 times as much energy—pays tens of billions of dollars of taxes while the president complains that it is 'subsidized'?" |
|
| |
— Stephen Moore, Wall Street Journal Editorial Board Member
|
|
|
— Stephen Moore, Wall Street Journal Editorial Board Member
|
|
Posted February 07, 2012 • 08:23 AM
|
|
|
| |
On Justice Ginsburg Recommending Newer Models Over U.S. Constitution: |
|
| |
"Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has caused a storm of controversy by saying in a television interview that the people of Egypt should not look to the United States Constitution when drafting their own governing document because it’s too old and there are newer examples from which to draw inspiration.
"'I would not look to the U.S. Constitution if I were drafting a constitution in the year 2012,' Ginsburg said in the interview, which aired on Jan. 30 on Al-Hayat TV. ...
"In the interview, she argued that the United States has the 'oldest written constitution still in force in the world,' so instead 'you should certainly be aided by all the constitution-writing that has gone on since the end of World War II.'" |
|
| |
— Alex Pappas, The Daily Caller
|
|
|
— Alex Pappas, The Daily Caller
|
|
Posted February 06, 2012 • 07:30 AM
|
|
|
| |
On Unions and Right-to-Work Laws: |
|
| |
"The [Indiana right-to-work law] is yet another indication that the American people understand that while unions serve a purpose, their political agenda is more about power and leverage than the rights of workers. The concept of the 'union shop' in which the government allows workers to be bullied and taxed into submission is repugnant. It also is the underlying factor behind the trend by which powerful municipal and state unions have used their leverage to win contracts taxpayers cannot afford. Though Indiana, like the battles over collective bargaining in Wisconsin, is just one front in a wide-ranging battle to overturn the tyranny of union thuggery, it is a signal triumph that should encourage other states to do the same (currently only 23 states have right-to-work laws)." |
|
| |
— Jonathan S. Tobin, Commentary Magazine
|
|
|
— Jonathan S. Tobin, Commentary Magazine
|
|
Posted February 03, 2012 • 07:38 AM
|
|
|
|