| |
On a Record-Setting Spending Year: |
|
| |
"Maybe it's a sign of the tumultuous times, but the federal government recently wrapped up its biggest spending year, and its second biggest annual budget deficit, and almost nobody noticed. Is it rude to mention this? ...
"The Obama years have racked up the three largest deficits, both in absolute amounts and as a share of GDP, since Hitler still terrorized Europe. Some increase in deficits was inevitable given the recession, but to have deficits of nearly $1.3 trillion two years into a purported economic recovery simply hasn't happened in modern U.S. history. Yet President Obama fiercely resisted even the token spending cuts for fiscal 2011 pressed by House Republicans earlier this year." |
|
| |
— The Editors, The Wall Street Journal
|
|
|
— The Editors, The Wall Street Journal
|
|
Posted October 19, 2011 • 07:52 AM
|
|
|
| |
On Polling the "Occupy Wall Street" Protesters: |
|
| |
"President Obama and the Democratic leadership are making a critical error in embracing the Occupy Wall Street movement — and it may cost them the 2012 election. ...
"The protesters have a distinct ideology and are bound by a deep commitment to radical left-wing policies. On Oct. 10 and 11, Arielle Alter Confino, a senior researcher at my polling firm, interviewed nearly 200 protesters in New York's Zuccotti Park. Our findings probably represent the first systematic random sample of Occupy Wall Street opinion.
"Our research shows clearly that the movement doesn't represent unemployed America and is not ideologically diverse. Rather, it comprises an unrepresentative segment of the electorate that believes in radical redistribution of wealth, civil disobedience and, in some instances, violence. Half (52%) have participated in a political movement before, virtually all (98%) say they would support civil disobedience to achieve their goals, and nearly one-third (31%) would support violence to advance their agenda." |
|
| |
— Douglas Schoen, Political Analyst, Pollster and Penn, Schoen & Berland Founding Partner
|
|
|
— Douglas Schoen, Political Analyst, Pollster and Penn, Schoen & Berland Founding Partner
|
|
Posted October 18, 2011 • 08:07 AM
|
|
|
| |
On the Washington Establishment's Big Problem: |
|
| |
"The Bigs – Big Wall Street, Big Government, Big Labor, and Big Business – are all protected classes in the American political system. The tax code, regulatory regime, and campaign finance laws are all written by those powerful enough to hire an army of lobbyists to descend on Washington. Labor unions pushed their way ahead of bond holders when the Establishment bailed out Chrysler. Solyndra got venture funding from the middle class taxpayer after spending $1.9 million lobbying the Establishment. ...
"In 2010, the tea party movement struck the first blow to the Establishment by working within the Republican Party to elect limited government, constitutional conservatives. Because their aim is to return power to individuals and localities, the tea party is the only organic, grass roots movement in this country that is by its very nature subversive to the political Establishment and therefore to the culture of 'The Bigs.' ...
"The central question of this defining period of time in which we live: Will the Tea Party, with all its iconoclastic energy and goals, succeed in defeating the Establishment? For the country’s sake, let’s hope the answer is yes." |
|
| |
— Michael A. Needham, Heritage Action for America CEO and Tim Chapman, Heritage Action for America COO
|
|
|
— Michael A. Needham, Heritage Action for America CEO and Tim Chapman, Heritage Action for America COO
|
|
Posted October 17, 2011 • 08:02 AM
|
|
|
| |
On the Democrats' Support of the "Occupy Wall Street" Protest: |
|
| |
"To the villainy-of-the-rich theme emanating from Washington, a child is born: Occupy Wall Street. Starbucks-sipping, Levi’s-clad, iPhone-clutching protesters denounce corporate America even as they weep for Steve Jobs, corporate titan, billionaire eight times over.
"These indignant indolents saddled with their $50,000 student loans and English degrees have decided that their lack of gainful employment is rooted in the malice of the millionaires on whose homes they are now marching — to the applause of Democrats suffering acute Tea Party envy and now salivating at the energy these big-government anarchists will presumably give their cause.
"Except that the real Tea Party actually had a program — less government, less regulation, less taxation, less debt. What’s the Occupy Wall Street program? Eat the rich." |
|
| |
— Charles Krauthammer, Syndicated Columnist
|
|
|
— Charles Krauthammer, Syndicated Columnist
|
|
Posted October 14, 2011 • 07:49 AM
|
|
|
| |
On Bursting the Green Jobs Bubble: |
|
| |
"Before his American Jobs Act failed to pass a Senate cloture vote Tuesday, President Barack Obama made a last-ditch speech to talk up his troubled bill. Not once did Obama mention 'green jobs' -- his erstwhile jobs of the future.
"Smart move. Obama's 2009 $787 billion stimulus package included $500 million for training programs that were supposed to create new green jobs for thousands of middle-class Americans. Last month, however, the Department of Labor's inspector general conducted an audit that found that as of June 30 -- with one-third of the funds spent and more than 50,000 participants -- only 10 percent of trainees were placed in jobs. And only 1,336 participants, or 2 percent, had held jobs for six months or longer. ...
"Unfortunately, the White House thought that it could stimulate the economy by rewarding favored donors and pet green causes, only to find that you can't build an economic recovery on a bubble of phantom jobs." |
|
| |
— Debra J. Saunders, San Francisco Chronicle Syndicated Columnist
|
|
|
— Debra J. Saunders, San Francisco Chronicle Syndicated Columnist
|
|
Posted October 13, 2011 • 07:46 AM
|
|
|
| |
On Mitt Romney's Performance in the New Hampshire GOP Debate: |
|
| |
"To say that Mitt Romney dominated last night’s Republican presidential debate in New Hampshire wouldn’t quite do his performance justice. By the end of the evening, he seemed to be the only even remotely plausible presidential candidate on the stage.
"In part that was due to the failure of the seven other candidates to rise to the occasion." |
|
| |
— John Podhoretz, New York Post
|
|
|
— John Podhoretz, New York Post
|
|
Posted October 12, 2011 • 07:59 AM
|
|
|
| |
On Attorney General Holder's Culpability in Operation Fast and Furious: |
|
| |
"Mr. Attorney General, you have made numerous statements about Fast and Furious that have eventually been proven to be untrue. Your lack of trustworthiness while speaking about Fast and Furious has called into question your overall credibility as Attorney General. The time for deflecting blame and obstructing our investigation is over. The time has come for you to come clean to the American public about what you knew about Fast and Furious, when you knew it, and who is going to be held accountable for failing to shut down a program that has already had deadly consequences, and will likely cause more casualties for years to come.
"Operation Fast and Furious was the Department’s most significant gun trafficking case. It related to two of your major initiatives – destroying the Mexican cartels and reducing gun violence on both sides of the border. On your watch, it went spectacularly wrong. Whether you realize yet or not, you own Fast and Furious. It is your responsibility." |
|
| |
— Congressman Darrell Issa (R-CA), House Committee on Oversight and Reform Chairman, in an October 9, 2011 Letter to Attorney General Eric Holder
|
|
|
— Congressman Darrell Issa (R-CA), House Committee on Oversight and Reform Chairman, in an October 9, 2011 Letter to Attorney General Eric Holder
|
|
Posted October 11, 2011 • 08:19 AM
|
|
|
| |
On How the TV Debates Have Shaped the 2012 Presidential Race: |
|
| |
"The debates have overwhelmed the Republican race. 'They are about all there's been to the campaign,' says Fox political commentator Brit Hume. After each debate the campaign has been frozen until the next one, except for arguments over issues spawned by the debates themselves. ...
"For Republicans, a campaign dominated by televised debates has two disadvantages. It puts the folks they loathe, the press, in control. The media can dwell on subjects such as tax cuts for the rich or social issues that one or more of the candidates would prefer not to discuss. They are hard pressed to squeeze their talking points into the dialogue. Mr. Obama gets a pass.
"Since the media pit the candidates against each other, Mr. Obama's strategists get an early glimpse of the vulnerabilities of the Republican candidates, their strengths and weaknesses on issues, and the attacks used most effectively against them. All Mr. Obama has to do is sit back and enjoy the show."
|
|
| |
— Fred Barnes, The Weekly Standard Executive Editor
|
|
|
— Fred Barnes, The Weekly Standard Executive Editor
|
|
Posted October 10, 2011 • 08:00 AM
|
|
|
| |
On Reid's Senate Rules Rout: |
|
| |
"In a shocking development Thursday evening, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) triggered a rarely used procedural option informally called the “nuclear option” to change the Senate rules.
Reid and 50 members of his caucus voted to change Senate rules unilaterally to prevent Republicans from forcing votes on uncomfortable amendments after the chamber has voted to move to final passage of a bill.
Reid’s coup passed by a vote of 51-48, leaving Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) fuming." |
|
| |
— Alexander Bolton, The Hill
|
|
|
— Alexander Bolton, The Hill
|
|
Posted October 07, 2011 • 08:10 AM
|
|
|
| |
On the Difference Between the Wall Street Protesters and the Tea Partiers: |
|
| |
"I am not the first to note the vast differences between the Wall Street protesters and the tea partiers. To name three: The tea partiers have jobs, showers and a point. ...
"The tea partiers didn't arrogantly claim to be drafting a new Declaration of Independence. They're perfectly happy with the original.
"Tea partiers didn't block traffic, sleep on sidewalks, wear ski masks, fight with the police or urinate in public. They read the Constitution, made serious policy arguments, and petitioned the government against Obama's unconstitutional big government policies, especially the stimulus bill and Obamacare.
"Then they picked up their own trash and quietly went home. Apparently, a lot of them had to be at work in the morning." |
|
| |
— Ann Coulter, Syndicated Columnist
|
|
|
— Ann Coulter, Syndicated Columnist
|
|
Posted October 06, 2011 • 08:09 AM
|
|
|
|