| |
On the Democratic Base and the Tax Compromise: |
|
| |
"The tax deal is certainly better for the economy than political gridlock over extending the tax cuts. How much better is uncertain.
"But the Democratic base seems more interested in expanding government than in stimulating the economy. They are bellowing with rage not so much at Obama but at the reality that he is grudgingly acknowledging. They had their time, and now it's gone." |
|
| |
— Michael Barone, Principal Co-Author, The Almanac of American Politics and Washington Examiner Senior Political Analyst
|
|
|
— Michael Barone, Principal Co-Author, The Almanac of American Politics and Washington Examiner Senior Political Analyst
|
|
Posted December 09, 2010 • 08:22 AM
|
|
|
| |
On the President's Tax Compromise With the GOP: |
|
| |
"In accepting the deal to cut payroll and business taxes and extend all of the Bush-era tax rates through 2012, Mr. Obama has implicitly admitted that his economic strategy has flopped. He is acknowledging that tax rates matter to growth, that treating business like robber barons has hurt investment and hiring, and that tax cuts are superior to spending as stimulus. It took 9.8% unemployment and a loss of 63 House seats for this education to sink in, but the country will benefit." |
|
| |
— The Editors, The Wall Street Journal
|
|
|
— The Editors, The Wall Street Journal
|
|
Posted December 08, 2010 • 08:11 AM
|
|
|
| |
FDR's Address to a Joint Session of Congress, December 8, 1941: |
|
| |
"[On] December 7, 1941 -- a date which will live in infamy -- the United States of America was suddenly and deliberately attacked by naval and air forces of the Empire of Japan… No matter how long it may take us to overcome this premeditated invasion, the American people in their righteous might will win through to absolute victory." |
|
| |
— President Franklin D. Roosevelt
|
|
|
— President Franklin D. Roosevelt
|
|
Posted December 07, 2010 • 08:54 AM
|
|
|
| |
On the Obama Administration and National Security: |
|
| |
"... It is not WikiLeaks that ultimately imperils our national security, but the failing Obama administration, which ignores the nature and extent of threats we face, and which is too often unwilling to act to thwart them. While our economic difficulties have dominated the national debate for two years, national security will inevitably again come to the fore, as Americans see the full extent of the devastation left by Obama's policies. That shift cannot come too soon." |
|
| |
— John Bolton, American Enterprise Institute Senior Fellow and Former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations
|
|
|
— John Bolton, American Enterprise Institute Senior Fellow and Former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations
|
|
Posted December 06, 2010 • 08:18 AM
|
|
|
| |
On the Administration's Reaction to WikiLeaks and Julian Assange: |
|
| |
"At a Monday news conference, Attorney General Eric Holder assured the nation that his people are diligently looking into possible legal action against WikiLeaks. Where has Holder been? The WikiLeaks exposure of Afghan war documents occurred five months ago. Holder is looking now at possible indictments? This is a country where a good prosecutor can indict a ham sandwich. Months after the first leak, Justice's thousands of lawyers have yet to prepare charges against Julian Assange and his confederates?
"Throw the Espionage Act of 1917 at them. And if that is not adequate, if that law has been too constrained and watered down by subsequent Supreme Court rulings, then why hasn't the administration prepared new legislation adapted to these kinds of Internet-age violations of U.S. security? It's not as if we didn't know more leaks were coming. And that more leaks are coming still...
"Want to prevent this from happening again? Let the world see a man who can't sleep in the same bed on consecutive nights, who fears the long arm of American justice. I'm not advocating that we bring out of retirement the KGB proxy who, on a London street, killed a Bulgarian dissident with a poisoned umbrella tip. But it would be nice if people like Assange were made to worry every time they go out in the rain." |
|
| |
— Charles Krauthammer, Syndicated Columnist
|
|
|
— Charles Krauthammer, Syndicated Columnist
|
|
Posted December 03, 2010 • 08:11 AM
|
|
|
| |
On Prosecuting the WikiLeaks Perpetrators: |
|
| |
"If we had a president in the White House who understood that we are at war with a crazed faction of Islam, and was willing to act on that belief, there would be no question about how we should deal with people who give aid and comfort to the enemy -- they’d be tried for treason and when found guilty stood up before a firing squad.
"Julian Assange and his fellow conspirator Pvt. Bradley Manning allegedly betrayed the United States, gave aid and comfort to the terrorists who seek to destroy the United States, and if found guilty they deserve nothing less than death sentences for their unspeakable crimes." |
|
| |
— Michael Reagan, Nationally Syndicated Talk Radio Host
|
|
|
— Michael Reagan, Nationally Syndicated Talk Radio Host
|
|
Posted December 02, 2010 • 08:44 AM
|
|
|
| |
On the President's Failed Foreign Policy Strategy: |
|
| |
"It is certainly true that Obama inherited many of his foreign-policy challenges. Iran was pursuing nukes back when he was in the Illinois state Senate, and North Korea has been crazy since before he was born. But Obama insisted that his would be the better way. Engagement, dialogue, and Kumbaya would all win the day.
"And yet they keep losing. A month after his inauguration, the North Koreans tested a ballistic missile. Since then, they’ve revealed yet another nuclear program and attacked South Korea just weeks after Obama’s embarrassing failure to win a trade deal from Seoul during an official visit. Meanwhile, according to WikiLeaks and other sources, the North Koreans have been selling ballistic missiles to the Iranians.
"And what are Obama’s global priorities? The START treaty, Israeli settlements, and climate change."
|
|
| |
— Jonah Goldberg, National Review Online Editor-at-Large
|
|
|
— Jonah Goldberg, National Review Online Editor-at-Large
|
|
Posted December 01, 2010 • 09:05 AM
|
|
|
| |
On the Congressional Battle Over the Bush-Era Tax Cuts : |
|
| |
"The biggest battle in the lame duck session of Congress may well be over whether or not to extend the Bush administration's tax cuts, which are scheduled to expire in January. The fact that this decision has been left until late in the eleventh hour, even though the expiration date has been known for years, tells us a lot about the utter irresponsibility of Congress.
"Neither businesses nor individuals nor the Internal Revenue Service will know what to do until this issue is resolved. In a stalled economy, we do not need this prolonged uncertainty that can paralyze both consumer spending and investment spending." |
|
| |
— Thomas Sowell, Economist, Author and Hoover Institution Senior Fellow
|
|
|
— Thomas Sowell, Economist, Author and Hoover Institution Senior Fellow
|
|
Posted November 30, 2010 • 08:57 AM
|
|
|
| |
On Politically Correct Portland, Oregon: |
|
| |
"In 2005, leaders in Portland, Oregon, angry at the Bush administration's conduct of the war on terror, voted not to allow city law enforcement officers to participate in a key anti-terror initiative, the FBI's Joint Terrorism Task Force. On Friday, that task force helped prevent what could have been a horrific terrorist attack in Portland. Now city officials say they might re-think their participation in the task force -- because Barack Obama is in the White House." |
|
| |
— Byron York, Washington Examiner Chief Political Correspondent
|
|
|
— Byron York, Washington Examiner Chief Political Correspondent
|
|
Posted November 29, 2010 • 08:58 AM
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
— From Everyone at the Center for Individual Freedom
|
|
|
— From Everyone at the Center for Individual Freedom
|
|
Posted November 24, 2010 • 10:38 AM
|
|
|
|