| |
On Representative Government and the 112th Congress: |
|
| |
"We gather here today at a time of great challenges. Nearly one in ten of our neighbors are looking for work. Health care costs are still rising for families and small businesses. Our spending has caught up with us, and our debt will soon eclipse the size of our entire economy. Hard work and tough decisions will be required of the 112th Congress. No longer can we fall short. No longer can we kick the can down the road. The people voted to end business as usual, and today we begin carrying out their instructions...
"The American people have humbled us. They have refreshed our memories as to just how temporary the privilege to serve is. They have reminded us that everything here is on loan from them. That includes this gavel, which I accept cheerfully and gratefully, knowing I am but its caretaker. After all, this is the people’s House. This is their Congress. It’s about them, not us. What they want is a government that is honest, accountable and responsive to their needs. A government that respects individual liberty, honors our heritage, and bows before the public it serves." |
|
| |
— Speaker of the House John Boehner (R-OH)
|
|
|
— Speaker of the House John Boehner (R-OH)
|
|
Posted January 06, 2011 • 08:01 AM
|
|
|
| |
On the GOP and the 112th Congress: |
|
| |
"In his personal modesty and rhetorical restraint, Mr. Boehner seems to understand that Republicans can't govern from the House. What they can do is stake out a GOP agenda that begins to repair the damage of the Pelosi years, begins to shrink and reform the government, and tees up the debate for 2012. This is the great Republican opportunity of the 112th Congress." |
|
| |
— The Editors, The Wall Street Journal
|
|
|
— The Editors, The Wall Street Journal
|
|
Posted January 05, 2011 • 08:42 AM
|
|
|
| |
On the New Congress and the U.S. Constitution: |
|
| |
"If the new Congress to be sworn in on Wednesday is the tea party's cardinal achievement so far, its most symbolic achievement will come on Thursday, when the first order of business in the House will be a reading, aloud, of the Constitution. That event alone will not bring us any closer to limited government. But it will help get a debate going that for too long has been dormant." |
|
| |
— Roger Pilon, Cato Institute Legal Affairs Vice President and Supreme Court Review Publisher
|
|
|
— Roger Pilon, Cato Institute Legal Affairs Vice President and Supreme Court Review Publisher
|
|
Posted January 04, 2011 • 08:08 AM
|
|
|
| |
On Judging the President's Economic Strategy: |
|
| |
"Obama has much riding on the economy in 2011. The present modest optimism reflects many factors: the renewal of the Bush tax cuts; pent-up demand for housing and autos; a recovering stock market; debt 'deleveraging' by households. Threats loom in Europe's financial problems, higher oil prices and paralysis over America's long-term budget deficits. The outcome may determine whether undecided Americans credit Obama for preventing a depression or blame him for hampering recovery." |
|
| |
— Robert J. Samuelson, Newsweek and Washington Post Contributing Editor
|
|
|
— Robert J. Samuelson, Newsweek and Washington Post Contributing Editor
|
|
Posted January 03, 2011 • 08:14 AM
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
Merry Christmas and Best Wishes for a Very Happy New Year!
As we gather with friends and family for this joyous holiday season, let us not forget those brave men and women who put themselves in harms’ way to protect our freedoms. Many of them won’t be with their families; they’ll be on bases, in tents and aboard ships far from home. So, let’s be sure to keep our troops in our hearts and in our thoughts this Christmas. And if you see members of our Armed Forces, please make it a point to thank them for all they do every day in the service to our great country. |
|
| |
— From Everyone at the Center for Individual Freedom
|
|
|
— From Everyone at the Center for Individual Freedom
|
|
Posted December 22, 2010 • 04:01 PM
|
|
|
| |
On the FCC's Internet Power-Grab: |
|
| |
"The same organization that forced all consumers to buy Ma Bell-made telephones for decades, the same FCC that enforced speech codes via radio 'fairness doctrines,' the same FCC that took two decades after its invention to OK cellular technology for the marketplace and acted similarly sluggishly with cable and satellite innovation has no business online. It has a history of hurting consumers, not protecting them. (Unless you need protection from fleeting expletives and the once-a-decade nipple controversy.)" |
|
| |
— David Harsanyi, Denver Post
|
|
|
— David Harsanyi, Denver Post
|
|
Posted December 22, 2010 • 08:15 AM
|
|
|
| |
On Economic Recovery and Government Interference: |
|
| |
"One of the biggest obstacles to economic recovery is that politicians and the media are both focused on how government can MAKE the economy recover, rather than on how it can LET the economy recover." |
|
| |
— Thomas Sowell, Economist, Author and Hoover Institution Senior Fellow
|
|
|
— Thomas Sowell, Economist, Author and Hoover Institution Senior Fellow
|
|
Posted December 21, 2010 • 08:37 AM
|
|
|
| |
On the FCC's Threat to Internet Freedom: |
|
| |
"Tomorrow morning the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) will mark the winter solstice by taking an unprecedented step to expand government's reach into the Internet by attempting to regulate its inner workings. In doing so, the agency will circumvent Congress and disregard a recent court ruling...
"Nothing is broken and needs fixing, however. The Internet has been open and freedom-enhancing since it was spun off from a government research project in the early 1990s. Its nature as a diffuse and dynamic global network of networks defies top-down authority. Ample laws to protect consumers already exist. Furthermore, the Obama Justice Department and the European Commission both decided this year that net-neutrality regulation was unnecessary and might deter investment in next-generation Internet technology and infrastructure.
"Analysts and broadband companies of all sizes have told the FCC that new rules are likely to have the perverse effect of inhibiting capital investment, deterring innovation, raising operating costs, and ultimately increasing consumer prices..." |
|
| |
— Commissioner Robert McDowell (R), Federal Communications Commission
Member
|
|
|
— Commissioner Robert McDowell (R), Federal Communications Commission
Member
|
|
Posted December 20, 2010 • 08:19 AM
|
|
|
| |
On the Defeat of the Senate's Pork-Laden Omnibus Spending Bill: |
|
| |
"The defeat of a pork-laden $1.1 trillion 'omnibus' spending bill in the Senate Thursday night was the first serious indication after the Nov. 2 election that the Tea Party movement has staying power and will be a force into 2011.
"Some Republicans on Capitol Hill said Thursday night that GOP leadership played a pivotal role as well. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell was said to have pressured key GOP lawmakers to stand firm against the legislation, though some in leadership said the conference was fairly united against it from the beginning.
"What was agreed upon by most is that the same grassroots wave that propelled Republicans to a huge November win had just made its sting felt for the first time in the legislative arena.
"'[It was] 100 percent grassroots … The American people took it down,' said John Hart, spokesman for Sen. Tom Coburn, Oklahoma Republican." |
|
| |
— Jon Ward, The Daily Caller White House and National Politics Correspondent
|
|
|
— Jon Ward, The Daily Caller White House and National Politics Correspondent
|
|
Posted December 17, 2010 • 08:05 AM
|
|
|
| |
On the Lame Duck Session's Business as Usual Approach to Spending: |
|
| |
"The weeks since Election Day have provided nauseating confirmation of Mark Twain's observation: 'There is no distinctly native American criminal class except Congress.'
"Exhibit A is the 'omnibus' spending bill Harry Reid is trying to push through the Senate. This monstrosity contains about 6,500 earmarks -- special provisions inserted on behalf of lobbyists to benefit special interests. The lobbyists get big fees, the interest groups get handouts and the politicians get rewarded with contributions from both.
"It's a win-win-win for everyone -- except the taxpayers who finance this carousel of corruption.
"Defenders of earmarks and other forms of pork-barrel spending argue that this behavior can't possibly be corrupt because it's legal. But not everything that's immoral is illegal and not everything that's illegal is immoral -- and earmarks definitely belong in the first category. Normal people would call it bribery, but it's business as usual on Capitol Hill." |
|
| |
— Daniel J. Mitchell, Cato Institute Senior Fellow
|
|
|
— Daniel J. Mitchell, Cato Institute Senior Fellow
|
|
Posted December 16, 2010 • 09:43 AM
|
|
|
|