| |
On the Impact of the Tea Party in the 2010 Midterm Elections and Beyond: |
|
| |
"More than half, or 54 percent, of Americans believe the tea party movement has been a good thing for the U.S. political system, our new survey revealed. Only 22 percent say that it is a bad thing, while 19 percent say it has made no difference.
"This agrees with other recent polls. Fifty-five percent of Americans said that the tea party movement can be effective in making major changes in Washington in the near future, according to the most recent ABC News/Yahoo! News poll...
"Independent estimates have shown that the movement has the potential to elect up to 100 House members and at least potentially six new senators, from Florida, Utah, Kentucky, Colorado, Alaska and maybe and Nevada.
"It is clear from our polling over the past 18 months – and certainly during this campaign – that rather than being a flash-in-the-pan, the tea party movement has the potential not only to play a big role in November, but to be decisive in the Republican nominating process in 2012. As well as in electing the next president." |
|
| |
— Scott Rasmussen, Rasmussen Reports President and Democratic Pollster Douglas Schoen
|
|
|
— Scott Rasmussen, Rasmussen Reports President and Democratic Pollster Douglas Schoen
|
|
Posted October 26, 2010 • 08:31 AM
|
|
|
| |
On the Truth Behind "Big-Money" in Elections: |
|
| |
"Team Obama’s message in the closing weeks of the campaign was completely eclipsed Friday by a union official who openly boasted in a story reported by The Wall Street Journal: 'We don’t like to brag,' but 'we’re the big dog' when it comes to campaign funding.
"Big as in $87.5 million. Big as in the biggest spender of any outside group -- all meant to protect the interests of unions, the new 'privileged class.' But wait a minute: Team O led us to believe that honor went to the vilified U.S. Chamber of Commerce and all of its alleged contributions from 'foreign money' sponsors.
"A record $87.5 million has been spent by one union, the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, to elect Democrats. Paid not by voluntary contribution from its members, but by forced union dues from workers -- who are paid by taxpayers." |
|
| |
— Mark McKinnon, Maverick Media President
|
|
|
— Mark McKinnon, Maverick Media President
|
|
Posted October 25, 2010 • 08:01 AM
|
|
|
| |
On Economic Belt-Tightening in Britain, France and Greece: |
|
| |
"All of these countries -- and many more -- are going through painful retrenchments because they spent too much money, made too many promises and expected too little from their own citizens. The era of European austerity is upon us, because the Europeans -- or at least those in charge -- understand the mess they've made of their economies.
"This should present a real problem for Barack Obama and the vast (though shrinking) chorus of experts, editorialists and activists who support his agenda. In broad terms, all of the policies Obama and the Democrats have pushed are the sorts of policies the British, the French and other Europeans had for years, even decades." |
|
| |
— Jonah Goldberg, National Review Online Editor-at-Large
|
|
|
— Jonah Goldberg, National Review Online Editor-at-Large
|
|
Posted October 22, 2010 • 08:16 AM
|
|
|
| |
On the Myth of Extremist Tea Party Candidates: |
|
| |
"One of the dominant myths of this election season is that Republicans have nominated too-extreme tea party candidates who are not electable in general elections, making it difficult for them to maximize their gains. It's been easy for cable talk show hosts to make that argument, given the high-profile, seriously-flawed candidacies of Christine O'Donnell and Carl Paladino, among others.
"But in reality, the clear majority of conservative and tea party nominees have proven themselves to be squarely in line with the electorate's mood and are well-positioned to usher in one of the most conservative Congresses since 1994." |
|
| |
— Josh Kraushaar, Executive Editor of National Journal’s Hotline
|
|
|
— Josh Kraushaar, Executive Editor of National Journal’s Hotline
|
|
Posted October 21, 2010 • 08:12 AM
|
|
|
| |
On Democratic Extreme Girls: |
|
| |
"We are in the era of Democratic Extreme Girls — Big Nanny handmaidens who demand control of your children, your health care, your energy use, your pocketbook, and your news. And that’s just for starters. If you think President Obama will move to the center after the midterms, think again...
"Among his inner circle, Obama has leaned on senior adviser and Chicago consigliera Valerie Jarrett, the woman who bragged about being 'delighted to be able to recruit' disgraced Marxist green-jobs czar Van Jones; Anita Dunn, the former communications director who touted Chairman Mao as her favorite philosopher and was the mastermind behind Team O’s war on Fox News; and, of course, the Big Nanny-in-Chief herself, Michelle Obama, who’s using her bully pulpit to pressure restaurants and schools to change their menus and to lobby Congress to redistribute $8 billion away from the federal food-stamp program for her public-employee-union payoff disguised as a child-nutrition bill.
"While liberal New York Times harridan Maureen Dowd gins up fear about Republican 'Mean Girls,' it’s the left-wing women pretending to be our benevolent caretakers who pose the greater threats to our families and freedom." |
|
| |
— Michelle Malkin, Syndicated Columnist
|
|
|
— Michelle Malkin, Syndicated Columnist
|
|
Posted October 20, 2010 • 08:09 AM
|
|
|
| |
On President Obama and the National Debt: |
|
| |
"New numbers posted today on the Treasury Department website show the National Debt has increased by more than $3 trillion since President Obama took office.
"The National Debt stood at $10.626 trillion the day Mr. Obama was inaugurated. The Bureau of Public Debt reported today that the National Debt had hit an all time high of $13.665 trillion.
"The Debt increased $4.9 trillion during President Bush's two terms. The Administration has projected the National Debt will soar in Mr. Obama's fourth year in office to nearly $16.5-trillion in 2012. That's more than 100 percent of the value of the nation's economy and $5.9-trillion above what it was his first day on the job." |
|
| |
— Mark Knoller, CBS News White House Correspondent
|
|
|
— Mark Knoller, CBS News White House Correspondent
|
|
Posted October 19, 2010 • 08:48 AM
|
|
|
| |
On the 112th Congress and ObamaCare: |
|
| |
"If voters return Republicans to majorities in one or both Houses of Congress, their Job One will be to start the process of repealing Obamacare and replacing it with realistic health care reforms that make universal access possible at a reasonable cost without putting federal bureaucrats in charge of U.S. medicine. President Obama will surely veto even a simple repeal measure, but Republicans still should put an end to Obamacare's most damaging and least popular provisions by defunding them. The process will also force Obamacrats in Congress to cast multiple votes they would probably prefer to avoid, thus setting the stage for a titanic 2012 presidential election contest." |
|
| |
— The Editors, The Washington Examiner
|
|
|
— The Editors, The Washington Examiner
|
|
Posted October 18, 2010 • 08:11 AM
|
|
|
| |
On the Advance Winner of the Most Shameless Attack Campaign of the 2010 Mid-Term Election: |
|
| |
"Most shameless attack campaign (national). President Obama suggesting that the U.S. Chamber of Commerce is secretly using foreign money to fund its campaign ads. There’s not a shred of evidence that this is true. When Bob Schieffer asked David Axelrod for evidence, Axelrod responded, 'Well, do you have any evidence that it’s not, Bob?' That’s like some lunatic claiming that Obama secretly says Muslim prayers at night that no one can see and no one can hear. You ask: What’s your evidence? He says: What’s yours that he is not? You say: No one’s ever seen or heard him do that. He says: Aha, that’s exactly my point." |
|
| |
— Charles Krauthammer, Nationally Syndicated Columnist
|
|
|
— Charles Krauthammer, Nationally Syndicated Columnist
|
|
Posted October 15, 2010 • 07:47 AM
|
|
|
| |
On Tax Increases and Government Spending: |
|
| |
"The public opposes tax hikes not because they don't wish to pay down the debt, but because they suspect the increased revenue will simply be a green light for even greater deficit spending." |
|
| |
— Victor Davis Hanson, Hoover Institution Senior Fellow and Nationally Syndicated Columnist
|
|
|
— Victor Davis Hanson, Hoover Institution Senior Fellow and Nationally Syndicated Columnist
|
|
Posted October 14, 2010 • 08:48 AM
|
|
|
| |
On Madam Speaker and the Midterm Election: |
|
| |
"In the home stretch of the 2010 campaign, Speaker Nancy Pelosi, more than even President Barack Obama, is emerging as the heaviest drag on Democratic hopes of holding on to the House.
"In district after district, from Florida's Gold Coast to central Ohio, in the Ozark Mountains, on the Minnesota prairie and in retiree-laden Arizona, Pelosi's face, plastered on billboards, recorded in video clips and emblazoned on mailers, is casting a pall over her colleagues’ chances of winning reelection.
"Conventional wisdom holds that midterm elections are referendums on the president — and Obama is certainly the central figure in the unfolding drama of the 2010 election. But if Democrats lose the House, it’s likely to be as much a rejection of the policies and politics of a woman who has managed to simultaneously become one of the most powerful speakers in congressional history and one of the most unpopular figures in American politics today." |
|
| |
— Jonathan Allen, Politico
|
|
|
— Jonathan Allen, Politico
|
|
Posted October 13, 2010 • 08:40 AM
|
|
|
|