Democrats hope to press the "affordability" issue in this year's midterm election season, but there'…
CFIF on X CFIF on YouTube
Inflation: Comparing Trump and Biden...

Democrats hope to press the "affordability" issue in this year's midterm election season, but there's one potentially glaring problem for them, as illustrated by our friends at Unleash Prosperity...

[caption id="" align="alignleft" width="668"] Biden Versus Trump on Inflation[/caption]

 …[more]

August 17, 2026 • 04:40 PM
Notable Quotes
 
On the 112th Congress and ObamaCare:
 
 

"If voters return Republicans to majorities in one or both Houses of Congress, their Job One will be to start the process of repealing Obamacare and replacing it with realistic health care reforms that make universal access possible at a reasonable cost without putting federal bureaucrats in charge of U.S. medicine. President Obama will surely veto even a simple repeal measure, but Republicans still should put an end to Obamacare's most damaging and least popular provisions by defunding them. The process will also force Obamacrats in Congress to cast multiple votes they would probably prefer to avoid, thus setting the stage for a titanic 2012 presidential election contest."

 
 
— The Editors, The Washington Examiner
— The Editors, The Washington Examiner
Posted October 18, 2010 • 08:11 AM
 
 
On the Advance Winner of the Most Shameless Attack Campaign of the 2010 Mid-Term Election:
 
 

"Most shameless attack campaign (national). President Obama suggesting that the U.S. Chamber of Commerce is secretly using foreign money to fund its campaign ads. There’s not a shred of evidence that this is true. When Bob Schieffer asked David Axelrod for evidence, Axelrod responded, 'Well, do you have any evidence that it’s not, Bob?' That’s like some lunatic claiming that Obama secretly says Muslim prayers at night that no one can see and no one can hear. You ask: What’s your evidence? He says: What’s yours that he is not? You say: No one’s ever seen or heard him do that. He says: Aha, that’s exactly my point."

 
 
— Charles Krauthammer, Nationally Syndicated Columnist
— Charles Krauthammer, Nationally Syndicated Columnist
Posted October 15, 2010 • 07:47 AM
 
 
On Tax Increases and Government Spending:
 
 

"The public opposes tax hikes not because they don't wish to pay down the debt, but because they suspect the increased revenue will simply be a green light for even greater deficit spending."

 
 
— Victor Davis Hanson, Hoover Institution Senior Fellow and Nationally Syndicated Columnist
— Victor Davis Hanson, Hoover Institution Senior Fellow and Nationally Syndicated Columnist
Posted October 14, 2010 • 08:48 AM
 
 
On Madam Speaker and the Midterm Election:
 
 

"In the home stretch of the 2010 campaign, Speaker Nancy Pelosi, more than even President Barack Obama, is emerging as the heaviest drag on Democratic hopes of holding on to the House.

"In district after district, from Florida's Gold Coast to central Ohio, in the Ozark Mountains, on the Minnesota prairie and in retiree-laden Arizona, Pelosi's face, plastered on billboards, recorded in video clips and emblazoned on mailers, is casting a pall over her colleagues’ chances of winning reelection.

"Conventional wisdom holds that midterm elections are referendums on the president — and Obama is certainly the central figure in the unfolding drama of the 2010 election. But if Democrats lose the House, it’s likely to be as much a rejection of the policies and politics of a woman who has managed to simultaneously become one of the most powerful speakers in congressional history and one of the most unpopular figures in American politics today."

 
 
— Jonathan Allen, Politico
— Jonathan Allen, Politico
Posted October 13, 2010 • 08:40 AM
 
 
On Political Vigilantism as a 2010 Campaign Tool:
 
 

"In their latest attempt to distract voters from their job-killing policies, President Obama, his White House and senior Democrats in Congress have added to their long list of bogeymen the outside groups that seek to help elect Republicans in November. They threaten congressional investigations, discuss private tax information and level baseless accusations of criminal activity against those who have been public in seeking to defeat Democratic candidates and their liberal agenda. Without a trace of irony, powerful Democratic officeholders lament that many who support these groups wish to remain anonymous...

"Interestingly, there is one investigation already under way, and it's of the White House. The Treasury Department's inspector general is looking into whether the president's top economic adviser improperly discussed with reporters private tax information about Koch Industries, whose founders are well known for their support of free-market ideas and conservative principles. 

"The fate awaiting Democrats in November is a result of their dismal economic record and their arrogance. One reason voters are deserting President Obama in droves is because of fears of unfettered, invasive government power -- fears that will only be reinforced by the Democrats' new political vigilantism."

 
 
— Ed Gillespie, Republican State Leadership Committee Chairman and former RNC Chairman
— Ed Gillespie, Republican State Leadership Committee Chairman and former RNC Chairman
Posted October 12, 2010 • 08:24 AM
 
 
On the Obama Mid-Term Report Card:
 
 

"Barack Obama is being politically crushed in a vise. From above, by elite opinion about his competence. From below, by mass anger and anxiety over unemployment. And it is too late for him to do anything about this predicament until after November's elections. 

"With the exception of core Obama Administration loyalists, most politically engaged elites have reached the same conclusions: the White House is in over its head, isolated, insular, arrogant and clueless about how to get along with or persuade members of Congress, the media, the business community or working-class voters. This view is held by Fox News pundits, executives and anchors at the major old-media outlets, reporters who cover the White House, Democratic and Republican congressional leaders and governors, many Democratic business people and lawyers who raised big money for Obama in 2008, and even some members of the Administration just beyond the inner circle." 

 
 
— Mark Halperin, TIME Magazine Senior Political Analyst and Editor-at-Large
— Mark Halperin, TIME Magazine Senior Political Analyst and Editor-at-Large
Posted October 11, 2010 • 08:36 AM
 
 
On the Importance of Estate Planning (in Presidential Politics):
 
 

"A reader passed along an obituary this week for a man who died last month in Rome, Ga. Donald Unsworth was 78 — husband, father, grandfather, veteran, former police officer, safety director of the Floyd County Police Department and owner of both Rome Driver’s Training School and Carter’s Hardware and Auto Parts. The obituary said Unsworth would 'always be remembered for his generosity and his willingness to help needy families and friends,' and suggested donations to the American Cancer Society. Additionally, Unsworth asked to be remembered in two years, requesting that contributions be made in his name to 'whoever is running against President Barack Obama in 2012.'"

 
 
— A.B. Stoddard, The Hill Associate Editor
— A.B. Stoddard, The Hill Associate Editor
Posted October 08, 2010 • 08:21 AM
 
 
On Defining the Obama Agenda:
 
 

"Obamalism: a political/social/economic philosophy that combines socialism, collectivism and redistributionism wrapped around a killer smile.

"Welcome, Mr. President, to your new reality... 

"Obamalism does not work."

 
 
— Larry Elder, Author, Syndicated Columnist and Radio Talk Show Host
— Larry Elder, Author, Syndicated Columnist and Radio Talk Show Host
Posted October 07, 2010 • 08:08 AM
 
 
On Politicians, Taxes and Economic Ignorance:
 
 

"What about the politician who tells us that he's not going to raise taxes on the middle class; instead, he's going to raise corporate income taxes as means to get rich corporations to pay their rightful share of government? If a tax is levied on a corporation, and if it is to survive, it will have one of three responses, or some combination thereof. One response is to raise the price of its product, so who bears the burden? Another response is to lower dividends; again, who bears the burden? Yet another response is to lay off workers. In each case, it is people, not some legal fiction called a corporation, who bear the burden of the tax.

"Because corporations have these responses to the imposition of a tax, they are merely government tax collectors. They collect money from people and send it to Washington. Therefore, you should tell that politician, who promises to tax corporations instead of you, that he's an idiot because corporations, like land, do not pay taxes. Only people pay taxes."

 
 
— Walter E. Williams, Author, Economist and Professor of Economics
— Walter E. Williams, Author, Economist and Professor of Economics
Posted October 06, 2010 • 08:23 AM
 
 
On the Dissonance of Hope and Change:
 
 

"In 2008, Obama impressed many Republicans I met on the campaign trail with his promise to bring a more mature, post-partisan style to Washington. In 2010, Gallup’s polls show him to be the most polarizing president in modern history.

"Making matters worse for the president’s damaged brand, The New York Times reports that his party plans to launch the most negative campaign in years. Democratic strategists helpfully explained to the Times that the purpose was to distract voters from Obama’s record over the past two years.

"So it’s come to this: Obama’s campaign themes of Hope and Change have devolved into a nasty and brutish off-year campaign message that will focus instead on tax liens and divorce filings."

 
 
— Joe Scarborough, Author, Radio and TV Host and Former Member of Congress (R-FL)
— Joe Scarborough, Author, Radio and TV Host and Former Member of Congress (R-FL)
Posted October 05, 2010 • 08:51 AM
 
Notable Quote   
 
"'You better get ready for ... war.' Across the country, radicals are openly planning for the next stage of their movement, and notably, the Democratic establishment is not part of their plans. Despite the talk of a 'Big Tent Party,' socialists are riding high on a surge of support and talking purges and revolution.In Chicago, radicals gathered for a conference on Marxism during what many view as…[more]
 
 
— Jonathan Turley, Fox News Media contributor and the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University
 
Liberty Poll   

As everyday American politics approach "daggers at dawn; press conference to follow" territory, do you want to engage more or less?