| |
On Tax Increases and Government Spending: |
|
| |
"The public opposes tax hikes not because they don't wish to pay down the debt, but because they suspect the increased revenue will simply be a green light for even greater deficit spending." |
|
| |
— Victor Davis Hanson, Hoover Institution Senior Fellow and Nationally Syndicated Columnist
|
|
|
— Victor Davis Hanson, Hoover Institution Senior Fellow and Nationally Syndicated Columnist
|
|
Posted October 14, 2010 • 08:48 AM
|
|
|
| |
On Madam Speaker and the Midterm Election: |
|
| |
"In the home stretch of the 2010 campaign, Speaker Nancy Pelosi, more than even President Barack Obama, is emerging as the heaviest drag on Democratic hopes of holding on to the House.
"In district after district, from Florida's Gold Coast to central Ohio, in the Ozark Mountains, on the Minnesota prairie and in retiree-laden Arizona, Pelosi's face, plastered on billboards, recorded in video clips and emblazoned on mailers, is casting a pall over her colleagues’ chances of winning reelection.
"Conventional wisdom holds that midterm elections are referendums on the president — and Obama is certainly the central figure in the unfolding drama of the 2010 election. But if Democrats lose the House, it’s likely to be as much a rejection of the policies and politics of a woman who has managed to simultaneously become one of the most powerful speakers in congressional history and one of the most unpopular figures in American politics today." |
|
| |
— Jonathan Allen, Politico
|
|
|
— Jonathan Allen, Politico
|
|
Posted October 13, 2010 • 08:40 AM
|
|
|
| |
On Political Vigilantism as a 2010 Campaign Tool: |
|
| |
"In their latest attempt to distract voters from their job-killing policies, President Obama, his White House and senior Democrats in Congress have added to their long list of bogeymen the outside groups that seek to help elect Republicans in November. They threaten congressional investigations, discuss private tax information and level baseless accusations of criminal activity against those who have been public in seeking to defeat Democratic candidates and their liberal agenda. Without a trace of irony, powerful Democratic officeholders lament that many who support these groups wish to remain anonymous...
"Interestingly, there is one investigation already under way, and it's of the White House. The Treasury Department's inspector general is looking into whether the president's top economic adviser improperly discussed with reporters private tax information about Koch Industries, whose founders are well known for their support of free-market ideas and conservative principles.
"The fate awaiting Democrats in November is a result of their dismal economic record and their arrogance. One reason voters are deserting President Obama in droves is because of fears of unfettered, invasive government power -- fears that will only be reinforced by the Democrats' new political vigilantism." |
|
| |
— Ed Gillespie, Republican State Leadership Committee Chairman and former RNC Chairman
|
|
|
— Ed Gillespie, Republican State Leadership Committee Chairman and former RNC Chairman
|
|
Posted October 12, 2010 • 08:24 AM
|
|
|
| |
On the Obama Mid-Term Report Card: |
|
| |
"Barack Obama is being politically crushed in a vise. From above, by elite opinion about his competence. From below, by mass anger and anxiety over unemployment. And it is too late for him to do anything about this predicament until after November's elections.
"With the exception of core Obama Administration loyalists, most politically engaged elites have reached the same conclusions: the White House is in over its head, isolated, insular, arrogant and clueless about how to get along with or persuade members of Congress, the media, the business community or working-class voters. This view is held by Fox News pundits, executives and anchors at the major old-media outlets, reporters who cover the White House, Democratic and Republican congressional leaders and governors, many Democratic business people and lawyers who raised big money for Obama in 2008, and even some members of the Administration just beyond the inner circle." |
|
| |
— Mark Halperin, TIME Magazine Senior Political Analyst and Editor-at-Large
|
|
|
— Mark Halperin, TIME Magazine Senior Political Analyst and Editor-at-Large
|
|
Posted October 11, 2010 • 08:36 AM
|
|
|
| |
On the Importance of Estate Planning (in Presidential Politics): |
|
| |
"A reader passed along an obituary this week for a man who died last month in Rome, Ga. Donald Unsworth was 78 — husband, father, grandfather, veteran, former police officer, safety director of the Floyd County Police Department and owner of both Rome Driver’s Training School and Carter’s Hardware and Auto Parts. The obituary said Unsworth would 'always be remembered for his generosity and his willingness to help needy families and friends,' and suggested donations to the American Cancer Society. Additionally, Unsworth asked to be remembered in two years, requesting that contributions be made in his name to 'whoever is running against President Barack Obama in 2012.'" |
|
| |
— A.B. Stoddard, The Hill Associate Editor
|
|
|
— A.B. Stoddard, The Hill Associate Editor
|
|
Posted October 08, 2010 • 08:21 AM
|
|
|
| |
On Defining the Obama Agenda: |
|
| |
"Obamalism: a political/social/economic philosophy that combines socialism, collectivism and redistributionism wrapped around a killer smile.
"Welcome, Mr. President, to your new reality...
"Obamalism does not work." |
|
| |
— Larry Elder, Author, Syndicated Columnist and Radio Talk Show Host
|
|
|
— Larry Elder, Author, Syndicated Columnist and Radio Talk Show Host
|
|
Posted October 07, 2010 • 08:08 AM
|
|
|
| |
On Politicians, Taxes and Economic Ignorance: |
|
| |
"What about the politician who tells us that he's not going to raise taxes on the middle class; instead, he's going to raise corporate income taxes as means to get rich corporations to pay their rightful share of government? If a tax is levied on a corporation, and if it is to survive, it will have one of three responses, or some combination thereof. One response is to raise the price of its product, so who bears the burden? Another response is to lower dividends; again, who bears the burden? Yet another response is to lay off workers. In each case, it is people, not some legal fiction called a corporation, who bear the burden of the tax.
"Because corporations have these responses to the imposition of a tax, they are merely government tax collectors. They collect money from people and send it to Washington. Therefore, you should tell that politician, who promises to tax corporations instead of you, that he's an idiot because corporations, like land, do not pay taxes. Only people pay taxes." |
|
| |
— Walter E. Williams, Author, Economist and Professor of Economics
|
|
|
— Walter E. Williams, Author, Economist and Professor of Economics
|
|
Posted October 06, 2010 • 08:23 AM
|
|
|
| |
On the Dissonance of Hope and Change: |
|
| |
"In 2008, Obama impressed many Republicans I met on the campaign trail with his promise to bring a more mature, post-partisan style to Washington. In 2010, Gallup’s polls show him to be the most polarizing president in modern history.
"Making matters worse for the president’s damaged brand, The New York Times reports that his party plans to launch the most negative campaign in years. Democratic strategists helpfully explained to the Times that the purpose was to distract voters from Obama’s record over the past two years.
"So it’s come to this: Obama’s campaign themes of Hope and Change have devolved into a nasty and brutish off-year campaign message that will focus instead on tax liens and divorce filings." |
|
| |
— Joe Scarborough, Author, Radio and TV Host and Former Member of Congress (R-FL)
|
|
|
— Joe Scarborough, Author, Radio and TV Host and Former Member of Congress (R-FL)
|
|
Posted October 05, 2010 • 08:51 AM
|
|
|
| |
On the Diversity of the "One Nation Working Together" Rally Participants: |
|
| |
"Organizers of Saturday's 'One Nation Working Together' rally at the Lincoln Memorial are proud of their diversity. Before the event, they predicted it would be the 'most diverse march in history.' It turned out they were right. Looking around the rally, there were Teamsters Local 311, Service Employees International Union Local 1199, Communications Workers of America Local 2336, American Federation of Teachers Local 1, United Auto Workers Amalgamated Local 171, Transport Workers Union Local 100, and representatives of many, many other unions. That's a lot of diversity." |
|
| |
— Byron York, The Examiner Chief Political Correspondent
|
|
|
— Byron York, The Examiner Chief Political Correspondent
|
|
Posted October 04, 2010 • 08:14 AM
|
|
|
| |
On the Polemic Forces Within the Democratic Party: |
|
| |
"There is a war beginning in the Democratic Party, and the president has lost control of his base.
"The Democratic leadership in the House appears to have lost another kind of control, fleeing Washington without passing a federal budget or extending even part of the Bush-era tax cuts, which are due to expire on Jan. 1. Democrats hold a solid majority in the House. They have a hitherto-powerful speaker. And the decision to adjourn passed by only a single vote -- that of Nancy Pelosi, who saw 39 Democrats join the Republicans in dissenting.
"The Democratic Party right now is showing signs of coming apart, under the pressure of the election and two years of an unpopular presidency. But it's not a split in two, with the left versus the establishment. It's more like a splintering, with left-leaning activists distancing themselves from the party's politicians and moderate politicians distancing themselves from Mr. Obama." |
|
| |
— Peggy Noonan, Author, Wall Street Journal Columnist
|
|
|
— Peggy Noonan, Author, Wall Street Journal Columnist
|
|
Posted October 01, 2010 • 08:10 AM
|
|
|
|