In our latest Liberty Update, CFIF highlights the debut of the "Most Favored Patient" initiative, which…
CFIF on X CFIF on YouTube
Image of the Day: Drug Prices Are CHEAPER in the U.S. Than Other Developed Nations

In our latest Liberty Update, CFIF highlights the debut of the "Most Favored Patient" initiative, which offers the optimal blueprint going forward for lower drug costs, greater access and better healthcare.

Well, the policy heavyweights behind Most Favored Patient come from the group at Unleash Prosperity, including Steve Forbes, Stephen Moore, Phil Kerpen, and Thomas Philipson.  And in addition to their new work at Most Favored Patient, they've unveiled a new commentary explaining how drug prices in the U.S. are actually cheaper than in other developed nations with which we're often unfairly compared:

It IS true that Americans pay more for new drugs under patent. That, of course, is because American pharmaceutical companies spend billions of dollars inventing the major breakthrough…[more]

August 20, 2025 • 08:24 PM

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Latest IRS Data: Wealthier Americans Again Paid More than Their “Fair Share”
By Timothy H. Lee
Thursday, October 14 2010
“The rich are not paying their fair share.”  So said Hillary Clinton earlier this year, parroting one of the political left’s favorite canards.  In fairness, perhaps she only meant to reference her own gilded marital syndicate with Bill.  Regardless, she’s absolutely right, but in a very different manner than she intended.  Wealthier Americans don’t pay their fair share of the nation’s income tax burden – they actually pay more than their fair share.  Says who?  The Internal Revenue Service (IRS).  This month, the…
 
The Cheney Way: Why Washington Needs More Anti-Heroes
“Dick Cheney is out of the hospital and back to raking in money defending torture and pre-emptive…
Read more...
The Scourge of Public Employee Compensation
If you’ve been looking for hard numbers to support the argument that the American public sector…
Read more...
 
“Cool It” – Bjorn Lomborg’s New Cinematic Rebuke to Global Warming Alarmists
Recent events prove that orthodox environmentalists can be a really hateful, vindictive bunch. …
Read more...
Sean Bielat: The Man Who Wants To Beat Barney Frank
Never before has Rep. Barney Frank (D-MA) faced such a serious challenge from a Republican of any stripe…
Read more...
 
Exclusive: Excerpts from Jimmy Carter’s “Post-White House Diary”
With the recent publication of former President Jimmy Carter’s “White House Diary”…
Read more...
Spend, Then Tax: Like Killing One’s Parents, Then Pleading for Mercy as an Orphan
Democratic leaders today resemble the proverbial murderer who slays his parents, then shamelessly seeks…
Read more...
 
CFIF’s “One More Vote” Campaign Launches Ad in Support of a Balanced Federal Budget with No New Taxes
Earlier this month, the Center for Individual Freedom (“CFIF”) launched its “One More…
Read more...
Obama’s New Stimulus – Bailing Out the Classified Section
The following was entered into evidence before a hearing of the Joint Economic Committee of the United…
Read more...
 
Lessons in Entrepreneurship from a Santa Monica Art Show
A Santa Monica art gallery isn’t the usual place to see the entrepreneurial spirit on display. …
Read more...
Conservative Latinos Launch Bus Tour for Carly Fiorina
What does a bus tour covering 42 cities, 32 counties and 2,500 miles in 10 days get?  The leaders…
Read more...
Notable Quote   
 
"A Democratic National Committee meeting on Tuesday devolved into an anti-Israel slugfest, leading its chairman, Ken Martin, to pull a resolution many party members believed was not harsh enough on the Jewish state. Instead, Martin invited the anti-Israel members to join a committee to reevaluate the party's position on Israel.The Martin-backed resolution, which the DNC initially approved, called…[more]
 
 
— Adam Kredo, Washington Free Beacon
 
Liberty Poll   

Apropos of Labor Day, do you believe that corporate CEOs are right to require employees to be in the office for a specified number of weekly days, in the interests of corporate direction, efficiency and output?