CFIF often highlights how the Biden Administration's bizarre decision to resurrect failed Title II "…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
Image of the Day: U.S. Internet Speeds Skyrocketed After Ending Failed Title II "Net Neutrality" Experiment

CFIF often highlights how the Biden Administration's bizarre decision to resurrect failed Title II "Net Neutrality" internet regulation, which caused private broadband investment to decline for the first time ever outside of a recession during its brief experiment at the end of the Obama Administration, is a terrible idea that will only punish consumers if allowed to take effect.

Here's what happened after that brief experiment was repealed under the Trump Administration and Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chairman Ajit Pai - internet speeds skyrocketed despite late-night comedians' and left-wing activists' warnings that the internet was doomed:

[caption id="" align="aligncenter" width="515"] Internet Speeds Post-"Net Neutrality"[/caption]

 …[more]

April 19, 2024 • 09:51 AM

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Midterms, Biden's Agenda and the Filibuster
By Byron York
Wednesday, November 02 2022
On March 2, 2021, when he had been president less than two months, Joe Biden met with a group of liberal historians in the White House East Room. The subject was Biden's "determination to be one of the most consequential presidents" in U.S. history, according to an account in Axios. The group talked a lot about Franklin Delano Roosevelt and the New Deal – Biden's model for the "think-big, go-big mentality" that characterized the first months of his presidency. The president has "giant plans teed up that could make Biden's New Deal the biggest change to governance…
 
Supreme Court Poised to Strike Down Racial Preferences
Lawsuits against Harvard University and the University of North Carolina are exposing the crude and dehumanizing…
Read more...
'Save Our Democracy' Is the New 'Russia Collusion'
At this point, it would save everyone time if Democrats could simply point to a policy agenda item that…
Read more...
 
Student Performance Suffers Unprecedented Decline, Confirming Need for School Choice
Are you better off today than you were two years ago?   Paraphrasing Ronald Reagan’s…
Read more...
'Zero Emissions' From Electric Vehicles? Here's Why That Claim Has Zero Basis
As California, New York, and other states move to phase out the sale of gasoline-powered cars, public…
Read more...
 
CFIF Launches Ad Campaign Calling for Repeal of Tennessee’s “Certificate of Need” (CON) Laws
NASHVILLE, TN – This week, the Center for Individual Freedom (CFIF) launched a digital and radio…
Read more...
Exposing Joe Biden's 'Jim Crow 2.0' Slander
Early voting began in Georgia several days ago. There is, of course, intense interest in both the state's…
Read more...
 
Fauci Can't Whitewash His Disastrous Legacy
This week, ABC News reporter Jonathan Karl asked Dr. Anthony Fauci, the soon-departing head of the National…
Read more...
Calamity Joe Targets the Gig Economy
America’s gig economy represents a rare unalloyed success story from the tumultuous past decade. …
Read more...
 
Who Denies Election Results?
A Democratic myth has arisen that former President Donald Trump's denial of the accuracy of the 2020…
Read more...
Who's More In Lockstep -- Republicans With Trump, Or Democrats With Biden?
There was an extraordinary Senate debate this week in Orem, Utah, between Sen. Mike Lee and challenger…
Read more...
Notable Quote   
 
"Conservative legal commentators are usually very cautious whether on cable or radio broadcasts or in-print for some obvious reasons detailed below. Legal commentators from the left are -- sharp contract alert -- much more likely to be egregiously, repeatedly and loudly wrong in their 'analysis.' And not just on questions concerning the criminal liability of former President Donald Trump, but again…[more]
 
 
— Hugh Hewitt, Constitutional Law Professor and Talk Radio Host
 
Liberty Poll   

If TikTok's data collection or manipulation under Chinese ownership is the grave danger that our government says it is (and it may well be), then wouldn't the prudent action be to ban it immediately rather than some time down the road?