Hans von Spakovsky, Senior Legal Fellow at the Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies at the Institute for Constitutional Government and The Heritage Foundation, discusses the Department of Justice's partisan shell game that raises ethical issues about the appointment of Pamela Karlan, a tenured professor at Stanford, as DOJ's principal deputy assistant attorney general for civil rights while she continued to earn $1 million per year from Stanford.

Lauren Sheets Jarrell, Vice President and Counsel for Civil Justice Policy at the American Tort Reform Association, discusses the Monsanto case before the U.S. Supreme Court, why state courts should not be able to override the EPA’s findings, and how junk science is the scourge of our judicial system.

William J. Conti, Attorney from Washington, D.C., discusses 2024 election results, whether President Biden bears some of the blame for the Democratic loss, and what the Trump administration will ultimately look like in his second term.

Tracy Beanz, Investigative Journalist with "Uncover DC," discusses her research and the latest news regarding the Jeffrey Epstein case, how media outlets had interviewed victims yet failed to report names and crimes to the FBI, and how photos of Epstein with powerful elites are being scrubbed from some search results.

Charles "Cully" Stimson, Senior Legal Fellow & Manager, National Security Law Program at The Heritage Foundation, discusses the legal cases against Wikileaks founder Julian Assange and what comes next.

Quin Hillyer, Contributing Editor of National Review Magazine, Senior Editor for The American Spectator Magazine and Associate Editor of the Washington Examiner , discusses newly released testimony by FBI attorney Lisa Page that makes former U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch look dishonest, the legal importance of the phrase "gross negligence," and whether DOJ should reopen the case against Hillary Clinton.

Michael Bindas, Senior Attorney with the Institute for Justice, discusses Tennessee Wine and Spirits Retailers Association v. Blair and the constitutional implications of Tennessee's anti-competitive liquor laws.