04 December 2015
Dan Epstein, Executive Director of Cause of Action, discusses the oral arguments in Van Hollen v. FEC (a case in which CFIF is an intervenor-party) and why the court should not require non-profits that fund electioneering communications to be forced to release a full list of its supporters.
0:00
0:00
Related Podcasts
30 September 2025
Paolo Carozza, Professor of Law at the University of Notre Dame and Co-Chair of the Oversight Board, discusses the independent Oversight Board’s role in providing rulings and recommendations on Meta’s platform postings, who comprises the board, how determinations are made, and the importance of transparency and platform accountability in the online digital space as they relate to free speech.
26 August 2022
Scott Blackburn, Research Director at the Institute for Free Speech, discusses a first-of-its-kind report that grades the freedom of citizens and advocacy groups in each state to speak about candidates, government and issues of public policy, which states performed poorly, and which states earned a respectable score.
01 March 2018
Bradley A. Smith, Chairman and Founder of the Institute for Free Speech, discusses the Mueller indictments, campaign finance laws, and proposals to respond to foreign interference with broad-based restrictions on American online issue speech.
01 May 2015
David Keating, President of the Center for Competitive Politics, discusses O'Keefe v Chisholm, a lawsuit that charges prosecutors in Wisconsin with a multi-year campaign to silence and intimidate conservative groups whose political speech they don't like, the status of campaign finance law five years after the SCOTUS decision in Citizens United, and an important victory for free speech in Nevada.
23 January 2015
Scott Blackburn, Research Fellow at the Center for Competitive Politics, discusses the effects of campaign-finance regulations on free political speech and participation, and how not even reformers can follow campaign-finance laws.



