Democrats hope to press the "affordability" issue in this year's midterm election season, but there'…
CFIF on X CFIF on YouTube
Inflation: Comparing Trump and Biden...

Democrats hope to press the "affordability" issue in this year's midterm election season, but there's one potentially glaring problem for them, as illustrated by our friends at Unleash Prosperity... Biden Versus Trump on Inflation

 …[more]

August 17, 2026 • 04:40 PM
Home Jester's Courtroom Expanded Ban Bags Lawsuit
Expanded Ban Bags Lawsuit Print
Wednesday, March 21 2012

Recently, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors passed a measure largely banning the use of plastic bags by city retailers.  The new ordinance is an expansion of the city's existing ban on plastic bags at grocery stores and pharmacies, which now includes all stores and restaurants.  Now the city is being sued over its expanded ban.

In a motion filed by Save the Plastic Bag Coalition, the group's attorney, Stephen Joseph, argues that the passage of the ordinance violates the California Environmental Quality Control Act because a lengthy environmental review was not conducted before the measure was enacted.  "The California Retail Food Code preempts and prohibits cities and counties from taking these matters into their own hands," Joseph argues.

The group contends that not only are plastic bags less environmentally hazardous than paper bags, but the 10-cent fee the measure imposed on the use of paper bags won't actually have an demonstrable impact on their consumption. "A 10-cent fee is, or may be, far too low to act as an effective incentive to promote the use of reusable bags. Very few people will carry a reusable bag to Macy's or other department stores to save a dime," the lawsuit read.

Supporters of the ban argue that plastic bags are a nuisance and clog up landfills.

—Source:  sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com

Notable Quote   
 
"Writing in the Wall Street Journal last week, former Fidelity Investments head Robert Pozen wrote what he always has, and that countless budget and Social Security scolds have written before him. According to Pozen and a Rose Bowl-sized collection of commentators who've come before and who've yet to come, a combination of benefit cuts and 'revenue measures' (yes, tax increases on the richest…[more]
 
 
— John Tamny, Editor of RealClearMarkets, President of the Parkview Institute, and Senior Fellow at the Market Institute
 
Liberty Poll   

Should there be a full-scale investigation of the Alaska Senate race in which a candidate with virtually the same name as the incumbent was recruited into the race to induce voter confusion.