Democrats hope to press the "affordability" issue in this year's midterm election season, but there'…
CFIF on X CFIF on YouTube
Inflation: Comparing Trump and Biden...

Democrats hope to press the "affordability" issue in this year's midterm election season, but there's one potentially glaring problem for them, as illustrated by our friends at Unleash Prosperity...

[caption id="" align="alignleft" width="668"] Biden Versus Trump on Inflation[/caption]

 …[more]

August 17, 2026 • 04:40 PM
Home Jester's Courtroom A Deadline is a Deadline is a Deadline
A Deadline is a Deadline is a Deadline Print
Friday, February 01 2008

Missing a court filing deadline by one minute may prove to be a very costly mistake for a Southern California law firm. Morrison & Foerster LLP may have cost their client about $1 million because their motion for attorneys' fees was filed one minute late.

According to court papers, one of the lawyers with the firm delivered the motion to a courier service at 3:14 p.m., forty-five minutes ahead of the looming deadline. "[We] never had a problem with getting papers filed by 4 p.m. when delivering them to the attorney service [about forty-five minutes before]," one of the firm's attorneys told the court.

The courier reported after encountering "unusually heavy traffic," he arrived at the courthouse one minute late (according to his calibrated watch) and found the doors locked. Federal court Judge Cormac Carney was unsympathetic. "These circumstances, however regrettable, do not meet the standard for 'excusable neglect," Judge Carney wrote. "[T]he entirely foreseeable obstacle of traffic in Southern California in the late afternoon ... cannot justify an enlargement of time."

The law firm's lawyers may take solace in the fact that Judge Carney ruled that even if the motion for attorneys' fees had been filed on time it would have been denied as there wasn't sufficient evidence to justify the award.

—Source: The Wall Street Journal

Notable Quote   
 
"A House Judiciary Committee investigation into the Environmental Policy Institute's Climate Judiciary Project confirms critics' claims that the group's judicial training provides activist-driven materials aimed at biasing judges overseeing climate litigation cases.The Environmental Policy Institute established the Climate Judiciary Project (CJP) in 2018 to provide “'judges with authoritative…[more]
 
 
— Kevin Killough, Just the News
 
Liberty Poll   

Based on the meteoric development of AI, do you believe that your job is going to be threatened or enhanced?