FREEDOM LINE BLOG: Image of the Day: U.S. Internet Speeds Skyrocketed After Ending Failed Title II…
CFIF often highlights how the Biden Administration's bizarre decision to resurrect failed Title II "…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
Image of the Day: U.S. Internet Speeds Skyrocketed After Ending Failed Title II "Net Neutrality" Experiment

CFIF often highlights how the Biden Administration's bizarre decision to resurrect failed Title II "Net Neutrality" internet regulation, which caused private broadband investment to decline for the first time ever outside of a recession during its brief experiment at the end of the Obama Administration, is a terrible idea that will only punish consumers if allowed to take effect.

Here's what happened after that brief experiment was repealed under the Trump Administration and Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chairman Ajit Pai - internet speeds skyrocketed despite late-night comedians' and left-wing activists' warnings that the internet was doomed:

[caption id="" align="aligncenter" width="515"] Internet Speeds Post-"Net Neutrality"[/caption]

 …[more]

April 19, 2024 • 09:51 AM
[close]

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Home Jester's Courtroom McMental Anguish
McMental Anguish Print
Wednesday, March 05 2014

A California man is suing McDonald’s for $1.5 million because he said he only received one napkin with his meal.

According to news reports, Webster Lucas visited a McDonald's in Pacoima, California and ordered a Quarter Pounder Deluxe. After noticing his meal came with only one napkin, Lucas asked for more and the manager declined his request. Lucas, who is black, claims that the manager, who is Mexican-American, made a racist remark.

After emailing the general manager and being offered some free food, Lucas remained unhappy. Claiming he is now unable to work because of the "undue mental anguish" he suffered as a result of the incident, Lucas has sued.

—Source: tmz.com

< Prev   Next >
Notable Quote   
 
"Conservative legal commentators are usually very cautious whether on cable or radio broadcasts or in-print for some obvious reasons detailed below. Legal commentators from the left are -- sharp contract alert -- much more likely to be egregiously, repeatedly and loudly wrong in their 'analysis.' And not just on questions concerning the criminal liability of former President Donald Trump, but again…[more]
  
 
— Hugh Hewitt, Constitutional Law Professor and Talk Radio Host
 
Liberty Poll   

If TikTok's data collection or manipulation under Chinese ownership is the grave danger that our government says it is (and it may well be), then wouldn't the prudent action be to ban it immediately rather than some time down the road?