CFIF often highlights how the Biden Administration's bizarre decision to resurrect failed Title II "…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
Image of the Day: U.S. Internet Speeds Skyrocketed After Ending Failed Title II "Net Neutrality" Experiment

CFIF often highlights how the Biden Administration's bizarre decision to resurrect failed Title II "Net Neutrality" internet regulation, which caused private broadband investment to decline for the first time ever outside of a recession during its brief experiment at the end of the Obama Administration, is a terrible idea that will only punish consumers if allowed to take effect.

Here's what happened after that brief experiment was repealed under the Trump Administration and Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chairman Ajit Pai - internet speeds skyrocketed despite late-night comedians' and left-wing activists' warnings that the internet was doomed:

[caption id="" align="aligncenter" width="515"] Internet Speeds Post-"Net Neutrality"[/caption]

 …[more]

April 19, 2024 • 09:51 AM

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Home Jester's Courtroom Lawsuit in Aspen Over the Aspens
Lawsuit in Aspen Over the Aspens Print
Thursday, November 20 2014

Two high-profile attorneys are engaged in a legal dispute over the removal of aspen trees in Aspen, Colorado.

Attorney Gerald Hosier is suing his neighbor, attorney Walter Stuart, after Stuart had trees cut down near the two men's property line so he could have a better view of Mount Sopris. According to court filings, Hosier contends the landscaper hired by Stuart removed 30 to 50 aspen trees, some of which were 90 feet tall and up to 70 years old. Hosier is seeking at least $1 million in damages -- the amount equal to the increase in land value as a result of the tree loss.

After the trees were cut, Hosier had PVC poles put in place to mark where the original trees stood.  Now, Stuart is fighting to remove the poles. “This case boils down to one primary question: what damage was done to the plaintiff’s property,” Stuart's attorney, Daniel Bristol, wrote in a filing in support of the bid to have the poles removed. “In order to answer this question, the defendants and the jury should see what the property actually looks like.”

Responding to Stuart’s motion, Hosier's attorney, Matthew Ferguson, wrote that the defendants “simply do not want to be reminded of what they have done. They want to remove any reminder of the scarring to plaintiff’s land — they want to argue we cut down your forest — but, ‘Hey, we gave you a meadow.’”

Judge Gail Nichols of Pitkin County District Court has not yet ruled on the matter.

Source:  aspendailynews.com

Notable Quote   
 
"Remember when progressives said the Trump Administration's rollback of net neutrality would break the internet? Federal Communications Commission Chair Jessica Rosenworcel now concedes this was wrong, yet she plans to reclaim political control over the internet anyway to stop a parade of new and highly doubtful horribles.The FCC on Thursday is expected to vote to reclassify broadband providers as…[more]
 
 
— Wall Street Journal Editorial Board
 
Liberty Poll   

If TikTok's data collection or manipulation under Chinese ownership is the grave danger that our government says it is (and it may well be), then wouldn't the prudent action be to ban it immediately rather than some time down the road?