Democrats hope to press the "affordability" issue in this year's midterm election season, but there'…
CFIF on X CFIF on YouTube
Inflation: Comparing Trump and Biden...

Democrats hope to press the "affordability" issue in this year's midterm election season, but there's one potentially glaring problem for them, as illustrated by our friends at Unleash Prosperity...

[caption id="" align="alignleft" width="668"] Biden Versus Trump on Inflation[/caption]

 …[more]

August 17, 2026 • 04:40 PM
Home Jester's Courtroom Teeing One Up for a Lawsuit
Teeing One Up for a Lawsuit Print
Thursday, February 12 2009

Some believe that a golfer cannot be held personally liable if his or her ball strikes another golfer so long as “FORE” is yelled.  But what happens if the golfer and the individual struck by the ball are one in the same? 

New Hampshire resident Paul Sanchez, 67, sued Candia Woods Golf Links after he was left blind in one eye by an errant golf ball.  It just so happens that it was Sanchez's own errant ball that struck him in the eye.

According to his attorney, Barry M. Scotch, Sanchez was golfing with some friends when a ball he hit bounced off a yardage-marker and “whacked him” in the right eye. 

Sanchez is seeking unspecified damages in the lawsuit, claiming that the golf course owners failed to warn him about the markers, which he further claims were improperly placed in the middle of the fairway and were made of material too rigid to be safe for the course.  The suit contends the course didn't warn Sanchez about the risk in the pro shop, on the scorecard or on any tee boxes.

"Before he could even -- pardon the expression -- blink, he was hit," Scotch said. "It just ricocheted right back at him."

Mary Ellen Sanchez, his wife, is also a party to the suit, claiming emotional damage.

The popular 18-hole course bills itself as the "Friendliest Course in New Hampshire."

—Source:  The Union Leader (Manchester, NH)

Notable Quote   
 
"The Supreme Court on Monday handed an initial win to the Trump administration in its effort to implement an executive order aimed at limiting who can receive mail-in ballots ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.At issue are provisions that seek to create a federal list of eligible voters and order the U.S. Postal Service to deliver ballots only to eligible voters.The justices, divided 6-3, granted…[more]
 
 
— Lawrence Hurley, NBC News
 
Liberty Poll   

Given proper zoning and appropriate regulation, do you support or oppose the construction and operation of a data center near you?