Democrats hope to press the "affordability" issue in this year's midterm election season, but there'…
CFIF on X CFIF on YouTube
Inflation: Comparing Trump and Biden...

Democrats hope to press the "affordability" issue in this year's midterm election season, but there's one potentially glaring problem for them, as illustrated by our friends at Unleash Prosperity...

[caption id="" align="alignleft" width="668"] Biden Versus Trump on Inflation[/caption]

 …[more]

August 17, 2026 • 04:40 PM
Home Jester's Courtroom Deal Ends 13-Year Suit Lawsuit
Deal Ends 13-Year Suit Lawsuit Print
Wednesday, March 10 2010

A long-standing legal battle over rights to the shirt, suit and tie that O.J. Simpson was wearing October 3, 1995, when he was acquitted of killing ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend Ronald Goldman has finally been settled.  For the past 13-years, legal rights to the clothing items have been sought by Simpson's former sports agent Mike Gilbert (who has possession of the items) and Ronald Goldman's father, Fred (who has been trying for years to seize Simpson's assets).
 
Earlier this month, Superior Court Judge Joseph Biderman approved Gilbert's plan to donate the suit to the Smithsonian Institution.  "It's part of American history," Gilbert said outside the court. "People should be able to see it and reflect on what went so wrong for someone who had everything."
 
Simpson, who is serving a minimum nine-year prison sentence for an unrelated incident, told the judge and lawyers that he approved of donating the suit, "as long as no one made a profit from it."
 
Earlier this week, the Smithsonian Institution rejected the donation, with Smithsonian spokeswoman Linda St. James stating that the suit is not appropriate for the museum's collection.

—Sources:  New York Daily News and Sun Sentinel (Broward County, Florida)

Notable Quote   
 
"The U.S. Supreme Court will kick off its 2026 term next week with what will be one of its biggest cases of the year. And according to several legal specialists, there's much more to the dispute than meets the eye.The case in question is Suncor v. Boulder, which deals with the lawfare that Boulder, Colorado, launched against Suncor Energy companies and the Exxon Mobil Corporation. The city is seeking…[more]
 
 
— Shawn Fleetwood, Teh Federalist
 
Liberty Poll   

Based on the meteoric development of AI, do you believe that your job is going to be threatened or enhanced?