The U.S. travel technology firm Sabre may not ring an immediate bell, and perhaps you’ve not yet heard…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
On Sabre/Farelogix Merger, DOJ Mustn’t Undertake a Misguided Antitrust Boondoggle

The U.S. travel technology firm Sabre may not ring an immediate bell, and perhaps you’ve not yet heard of its proposed acquisition of Farelogix, but it looms as one of the most important antitrust cases to approach trial since AT&T/Time-Warner. The transaction’s most significant aspect is the way in which it offers a perfect illustration of overzealous bureaucratic antitrust enforcement, and the way that can delay and also punish American consumers. Specifically, the transaction enhances rather than inhibits market competition, and will benefit both travelers and the travel industry by accelerating innovation.  That’s in part because Sabre and Farelogix aren’t head-to-head market competitors, but rather complementary businesses.  While Sabre serves customers throughout the…[more]

January 13, 2020 • 03:53 pm

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's CourtroomLegal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts.
Move over Lois Lerner: Lawsuit Says IRS Destroying Evidence in Separate Case Print
By Ashton Ellis
Wednesday, October 08 2014
Taken together, this pattern of results indicates a culture of corruption at the IRS that seeks to avoid blame by hiding the facts.

Private lawsuits against the IRS are nothing new, but one claim against the tax-gathering agency should interest House Republicans investigating the possible willful destruction of evidence by former manager Lois Lerner and other employees. 

According to federal court documents, the IRS “wiped clean a number of computer hard drives containing emails and other electronic documents that the Government was required to produce.”

Not surprisingly, the information scrubbed supported several arguments by a private company suing to recover nearly $550 million that the IRS improperly collected.

The recent assertion was made by attorneys for NetJets, a subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway, whose legal wrangling with the IRS began in 2011.

Though not connected to the conservative non-profit targeting scandal, the NetJets lawsuit shares a striking – and troubling – similarity.

In both cases, the IRS is accused of losing evidence that would materially affect the outcomes of a conflict.

The NetJets dispute hinges on whether the IRS followed the law when the latter levied a $218 million tax on the company’s clients. NetJets – a firm that sells fractional shares in private jets – claims the tax is improper because it only applies to commercial airline passengers. NetJets is also seeking a $330 million tax abatement.

To recall, the IRS targeting scandal centers on alleged discrimination by officials of the agency’s tax-exempt division who used words like “tea party” and “patriot” to select applications for extra scrutiny. The result was a much longer wait time for approval, effectively sidelining otherwise legal organizations from speaking during the 2012 presidential election.

Lois Lerner, the then-chief of the IRS tax-exempt unit, quickly became the face of the scandal. Along with joining now-departing U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder as one of two members of the Obama administration to be cited for Contempt of Congress, Lerner refused to answer questions about her involvement.

After Lerner took an early retirement, the scandal plunged to new depths when IRS officials said that Lerner’s computer hard drive crashed, taking potentially thousands of incriminating emails with it. More recently, the agency has admitted that it also can’t find other emails related to the targeting program. 

House Republicans smell a rat. 

“The supposed loss of Lerner’s emails further blows a hole in the credibility of claims that the IRS is complying with congressional requests and their repeated assurances that they’re working to get to the truth,” said Darrell Issa (R-CA), House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman. “If there wasn’t nefarious conduct that went much higher than Lois Lerner in the IRS targeting scandal, why are they playing these games?”

Though the NetJets and conservative targeting scandal don’t involve the same IRS units or personnel, it is deeply troubling that the same agency is being accused by federal investigators and private litigants of withholding information it is legally obligated to hand over.

Taken together, this pattern of results indicates a culture of corruption at the IRS that seeks to avoid blame by hiding the facts. The operating principle seems to be: When in doubt, wipe it out.

Combine these cases with the IRS decision to rewrite ObamaCare’s subsidy regime without any textual authority from the law itself, and what emerges is the picture of a federal agency willfully disregarding the rule of law. 

“That the power to tax involves the power to destroy… [is] not to be denied,” wrote Chief Justice John Marshall in McCulloch v. Maryland.

In McCulloch, Marshall relied in part on that reasoning to strike down a state law to tax a federal agency. Today, Congress and the federal courts should consider reining in the IRS before it destroys the rights of the citizens it ostensibly serves.

Question of the Week   
Which one of the following was the first African-American soloist to appear at the Metropolitan Opera House in New York City?
More Questions
Quote of the Day   
 
"If there were such egregious misconduct that the public was convinced of the need to remove Trump, such that two-thirds of the Senate would ignore partisan ties and do just that, there would be no partisan stunts. Democratic leaders would have worked cooperatively with their GOP counterparts, as was done in prior impeachments. They would have told the president: 'Sure, you can have your lawyers here…[more]
 
 
—Andrew C. McCarthy, National Review
— Andrew C. McCarthy, National Review
 
Liberty Poll   

Should witnesses be called for the Senate impeachment trial, which could take weeks or even months, or be restricted to the record and evidence already produced by the House?