In recent months, Google has justifiably suffered heavy criticism for selectively acting as internet…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
Google and Other Politicized Organizations Target 2nd Amendment and Consumer Choice

In recent months, Google has justifiably suffered heavy criticism for selectively acting as internet gatekeeper, deciding what Americans can and cannot view online.  Countless examples exist when the liberal Silicon Valley giant leveraged its  market power to censor along ideological lines, including:  banning the conservative blog The New York Conservative, hosted on Google Blogger, for opining on the trial of terrorist Khalid Sheikh Mohammed;  demoting pro-Brexit/Euroskeptic websites by pushing them down in search results;  excluding Donald Trump from “presidential candidates” search;  and blocking free speech social network Gab from the Google Play Store, alleging violations of the company’s hate speech policy.

The latest revelation of Google’s partisan bias…[more]

September 19, 2018 • 10:27 pm

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's CourtroomLegal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts.
Do You Really Want America to Look Like Twitter? Print
By David Harsanyi
Friday, June 29 2018
Now, should it even be said that if any conservative politician had called for mobs to badger Democratic officials when they're at the supermarket, the nation would be thrust into a national dialogue about the growing and perilous incivility on the right?

It looks as if the next phase of our ginned-up national moral panic will feature the public shunning and harassment of people we disagree with. And in a free country, even the pretend oppressed can kick imaginary Nazis out of their establishments, as we saw when the co-owner of The Red Hen in Lexington, Virginia, booted White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders from her restaurant.

Certainly, politicos don't deserve safe spaces from peaceful protest or confrontation. You want to make their lives miserable, humiliate them and show everyone how principled and right-thinking you are? By all means, stop them from having those chimichangas. That'll teach 'em.

But don't fool yourself into self-idealization. You're no budding Martin Luther King. No matter what you think of President Donald Trump, you're still an insufferable jerk. You're just a member of a blindered tribalist mob, imbued with a false sense of certitude that allows you to justify incivility. That is to say, you're like a Twitter troll made real.

It should be noted that this kind of harassment isn't widespread in the real world, though it is widely justified by liberals. Many leftists have convinced themselves that members of the Trump administration  in place after a free and legal election and, to this point, comporting with the laws of American governance  should all be in front of a judge in The Hague. It isn't only about the separation of families at the southern border. It's about tax cuts. It's about Obamacare. It's about everything. Republicans are regularly accused of being accomplices to murder. The hysterics that bloom from that kind of position create a swelling exasperation among Democrats that borders on religiosity.

"If you see anybody from that Cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station," said Rep. Maxine Waters, erstwhile outlier of the irrational left and now hero of the "resistance," "you get out and you create a crowd and you push back on them and you tell them they're not welcome anymore, anywhere." Create a crowd, huh? Not welcome anywhere? That's a tough spot.

Now, should it even be said that if any conservative politician had called for mobs to badger Democratic officials when they're at the supermarket, the nation would be thrust into a national dialogue about the growing and perilous incivility on the right? There would be a flood of anxious op-ed pieces and cable news roundtables featuring chin-stroking hypocrites contemplating the future of discourse in America. No one would be spared. Every Republican politician on earth would be asked to condemn these comments.

But at least Waters doesn't lean on some rickety whataboutism for the practice of hounding members of the Trump administration out of their local supermarkets.

"Some who defend baker's right to refuse service to gay couples, whine re ppl refusing service to a person who's the face of a deceitful Administration," tweeted the perpetually confused Ana Navarro. "What's good for the goose, is good for the Red Hen. Difference is, being gay is not a choice. Being an accomplice to Trump, is."

The problem with this widely used talking point isn't the tit-for-tat vacuousness; it's the flawed analogy. Jack Phillips never refused service for a gay couple in the first place. That's simply a smear that the left has endlessly repeated. Phillips, whose shop was open to everyone, refused to design a unique cake that would have featured a message that he felt would undermine his faith. He would have refused to make the same cake for a straight couple  or any kind of cake that would have undermined his faith for any kind of person.

The co-owner of The Red Hen, on the other hand, refused service for someone simply because she disliked her beliefs. She was free to do so. But Sanders didn't demand that the chef at The Red Hen create a specialized "Make America Great Again" dish.

Of course, to some extent, President Trump invites this sort of reaction. Then again, to some extent, political Trump exists because of the decades of hyperbolic attacks on Republicans. Fact is, Democrats make little distinction between soft-spoken moderates such as Paul Ryan and crude sometimes-conservatives such as Trump. Democrats have been comparing Republicans to Nazis since the 1960s.

But if liberals really believe Sanders works for an "inhumane and unethical" administration as the co-owner of The Red Hen does, that's fine. (Although, it's interesting that her supposed moral outrage seemed to be wholly predicated on policies that existed under the Obama administration.) I'm sure Republicans can relate. I'm sure social conservatives saw the Obama administration's support of abortion with virtually no limitations as being just as morally repugnant.

If you believe this is true, you have to ask yourself: Why wouldn't you kick the imaginary Nazi out of your restaurant? Why wouldn't you spit on the imaginary Nazi? Why wouldn't you punch the imaginary Nazi? Maybe that's where it all leads.

David Harsanyi is a senior editor at The Federalist and the author of the forthcoming book "First Freedom: A Ride Through America's Enduring History With the Gun, From the Revolution to Today." 

Question of the Week   
Which one of the following asked “Which office do I go to to get my reputation back?”
More Questions
Quote of the Day   
"Christine Blasey Ford's lawyer has announced that Ms. Ford will not testify until the FBI completes yet another investigation of Judge Brett Kavanaugh that everyone knows will never happen.It was already highly unlikely she was ever going to testify; this is a convenient excuse, a stalling game. But it is more than the usual cheap political stunt. It's vicious, ugly, and more than slightly sadistic…[more]
—Roger L. Simon, PJ Media Co-Founder and CEO Emeritus
— Roger L. Simon, PJ Media Co-Founder and CEO Emeritus
Liberty Poll   

Which one of the following U.S. Senators do you believe behaved most dishonorably during the Senate Judiciary Committee hearings on the confirmation of Judge Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court?