One of the great triumphs of the federal welfare reform legislation passed in the mid-1990s was an insistence…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
To Get More Federal Money, States Claiming Volunteer Organizations are a Form of Welfare Spending

One of the great triumphs of the federal welfare reform legislation passed in the mid-1990s was an insistence that states lay down tough work requirements for welfare recipients as a condition of receiving federal assistance. Though the fact is little publicized, however, another provision of the law allows states to substitute increased welfare spending for the work requirements and still receive money from Washington. That, of course, is an invitation to mischief, as reported by CNSnews, quoting Congressman Geoff Davis

"Many States have scoured their budgets to find other current program spending--such as for Pre-K, child care, and after school programs--they could report as TANF [welfare] spending," Davis said at a hearing on Thursday. "Others began counting third-party spending--such…[more]

May 22, 2012 • 01:24 pm

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's CourtroomLegal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts.
The Country – Not the GOP – is Moving to the Right Print
By Troy Senik
Thursday, May 06 2010
That the governing style of the Obama Administration has catalyzed public sentiment back toward the founding principles of limited government has made the GOP’s return to its roots something of a glide path – but it will have to be fought for in order to be preserved.

Liberal journalists (but I repeat myself) – a fraternity for whom indignation is proof of sentience – believed they had found just cause to be aghast last week in the nation’s fourth largest state. Deeming themselves the keepers of political Wisdom, the chattering class bayed at the news that Florida Governor Charlie Crist is leaving the Republican Party to continue his pursuit of a seat in the U.S. Senate as an Independent.
 
The mainstream media laments the Crist defection as only the most recent sign that the conservative movement – smelling blood in the wake of the declining popularity of liberal government – is in the midst of an ideological purge.  From The New York Times to MSNBC, the narrative is unvarying: the right wing, having lost itself in the fever swamps of the Tea Party movement, is dragging the GOP away from the sensible center, ensuring a self-marginalization that will keep Republicans wandering in the political wilderness for the foreseeable future.

Crist and the Tea Parties are only the most recent invocation of this trend.  The defection of erstwhile Republican Senator Arlen Specter to Democratic ranks, the supposed overreach of Arizona’s new immigration law, and the unanimous Republican opposition to health care reform have all been cited as proof that a revanchist conservative movement is willing to follow its first principles off a cliff.

Hogwash.  Crist’s decision to run as an independent stemmed from one simple fact: he is demonstrably unable to win a Republican primary.  In the course of a year, Crist’s poll numbers against conservative former Florida House Speaker Marco Rubio dropped by around 50 points. Apart from the pundits who lament his extirpation, there’s no market for what Crist is selling.

Nor are the other signs of the rightward death march particularly compelling. If Senator Specter is the hallmark of moderate pragmatism, why aren’t Democrats being held to account for the fact that liberal Representative Joe Sestak is now within just a few points of Specter in the Pennsylvania primary? If Arizona’s immigration law is a form of voluntary political suicide, why does it enjoy majority support nationwide (as well as in the Grand Canyon State)?  And if opposition to ObamaCare was gratuitous obstructionism, why did that opposition see consistent increases in public support as voters learned more about the reform plan? 

If the Republican Party is turning to the right, it’s because it found out what life in the center was like. Per the axiom of southern politics, “there ain’t nothing in the middle of the road but yellow lines and dead armadillos.” When the GOP lost its commitment to limited government and individual freedom, it became a pale-faced confederation of appropriators, unable to articulate a principled standard for the limits of government or offer a vision of sufficient contrast from the Democrats.
 
That the governing style of the Obama Administration has catalyzed public sentiment back toward the founding principles of limited government has made the GOP’s return to its roots something of a glide path – but it will have to be fought for in order to be preserved. The emergence of candidates like Marco Rubio shows that certain quarters of the Republican Party have immunized themselves against the temptation to become what used to be referred to as “Me Too Republicans” – nominal members of the GOP who genuflect to every statist idea from the left.  This new generation of leaders are standing strong, they’re planting their flag, and if that leaves the media floored … well, then, all the  better.

Question of the Week   
Which one of the following men did the Chicago Tribune describe as: “a bullheaded man whose high place … was won by his ability to waste more money in quicker time on more absurd undertakings?”
More Questions
Quote of the Day   
 
"This week Catholic bishops are heading to federal courts across the country to defend religious liberty. On Monday they filed 12 lawsuits on behalf of a diverse group of 43 Catholic entities that are challenging the Department of Health and Human Services' (HHS) sterilization, abortifacient and birth-control insurance mandate. ...  The main goal of the mandate is not, as HHS claimed, to protect…[more]
 
 
—Mary Ann Glendon, Harvard Law School Professor
— Mary Ann Glendon, Harvard Law School Professor
 
Liberty Poll   

Should the Obama administration authorize the use of aerial drones by local police agencies?