Here's some potentially VERY good economic news that was lost amid the weekend news flurry.  Those…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
Some Potentially VERY Good Economic News

Here's some potentially VERY good economic news that was lost amid the weekend news flurry.  Those with "skin in the game," and who likely possess the best perspective, are betting heavily on an upturn, as highlighted by Friday's Wall Street Journal:

Corporate insiders are buying stock in their own companies at a pact not seen in years, a sign they are betting on a rebound after a coronavirus-induced rout.  More than 2,800 executives and directors have purchased nearly $1.19 billion in company stock since the beginning of March.  That's the third-highest level on both an individual and dollar basis since 1988, according to the Washington Service, which provides data analytics about trading activity by insiders."

Here's why that's important:

Because insiders typically know the…[more]

March 30, 2020 • 11:02 am

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's CourtroomLegal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts.
HHS Wants to Change Your “Health-Relevant Behavior” Print
By Ashton Ellis
Thursday, October 31 2013
NLM is spending taxpayer money to teach itself how to change people’s 'health-relevant behavior.'

Are you ready to have the same federal agency that can’t run a website bombard you with social media messages designed to change your “health-related” behaviors?

Last week, a little-known federal aggregator of health scholarship called the National Library of Medicine (NLM) announced that it plans to track how visitors to its website use information received there. NLM, an entity within the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), “will have software installed on government computers that will store data from social media as part of a $30,000 project,” reported the Washington Free Beacon.

The software will engage in wide-ranging data mining of visitors’ social media profiles on Facebook and Twitter, as well as track their use of blogs, discussion boards, news sites and video and image sharing sites. NLM plans to capture and store demographic nuggets such as the location, number of followers and academic degrees of users. All of this limited, of course, “to the extent permitted by privacy regulations.” (If you believe that, the National Security Agency would like to speak with you.)

Tellingly, the information gathered will be saved for “historical analysis” – meaning it won’t be destroyed but instead stored in a government database. The data mining process also promises to collect much more than health information, since bureaucrats are to be trained how to access “health-related content,” implying there will be other content they are supposed to ignore.

So, what’s motivating a sleepy government medical library to take such an aggressive social media posture?

Two words: behavior modification.

“The overarching objective of these studies is to obtain a richer understanding of how consumers, clinicians, [and] researchers actually look for the health-related information they seek, and what they do with what they find,” NLM said in a statement.

But what the agency is really interested in are the “value of tweets and other messages as teaching tools and change-agents for health-related behavior.”  

You read that right. NLM is spending taxpayer money to teach itself how to change people’s “health-relevant behavior.”

This amounts to enhancing the power HHS has to control the health care industry. Already the department is the single largest spender thanks to its commitments under Medicare and Medicaid. As Obamacare is implemented, millions more Americans will come within its reach because of the large-scale shift of workers onto the HHS-regulated health insurance exchanges. Going forward, if NLM is allowed to become a government policy marketing firm, HHS will become American health care’s biggest spender, most important regulator and – perhaps – its most influential information source.

The sudden changeover from passive librarian to aggressive behavior modifier likely isn’t an isolated decision dreamed up by career bureaucrats. More likely, it’s part of a coordinated attempt to directly make people conform to a government-approved standard.

Remember these entries from the Nanny State files?

In New York City, Mayor Michael Bloomberg has waged municipal wars against super-sized sodas, table salt and trans-fat.

First Lady Michelle Obama’s failed campaign to make public school children eat more healthfully died a quick and unceremonious death when thousands of kids simply went hungry rather than chow-down on government soy burgers.

The reason liberals are in overdrive when it comes to forcing people to be healthier is because even they realize you can’t operate a single-payer health care system without micromanaging every individual’s food intake and exercise routine. And, since a single-payer system is where many in the liberal intelligentsia are agitating to take us, it is time to start using government resources to change our behavior to get ready for the transition. 

So, when you get a benign-looking message from the National Library of Medicine just remember that it’s really a directive from the Obama administration to change your behavior.

Tweet accordingly.

Question of the Week   
In which one of the following years did Congress first meet in Washington, D.C.?
More Questions
Quote of the Day   
"New York Governor Andrew Cuomo called on the federal government to take control of the medical supply market. Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker demanded that President Trump take charge and said 'precious months' were wasted waiting for federal action. Some critics are even more direct in demanding a federal takeover, including a national quarantine.It is the legal version of panic shopping. Many seem…[more]
—Jonathan Turley, George Washington University Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law
— Jonathan Turley, George Washington University Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law
Liberty Poll   

Who is most to blame for the delay in passage of the critical coronavirus economic recovery (or stimulus) bill?