Congress Stands Up Against Obama's Attempt to Surrender Global Internet Oversight
In March of 2014, the Obama Administration foolishly announced its intent to relinquish oversight of Internet domain name functions to the so-called "global stakeholder community."
That is a dangerous idea for innumerable reasons, as observers like L. Gordon Crovitz of The Wall Street Journal have chronicled well. Among other risks, consider the piracy threat that surrendering U.S. oversight poses to critical American artistic industries like music and film. Online piracy already constitutes an enormous problem to those world-leading industries, and allowing Internet governance to drift into a Hobbesian global abyss would only exacerbate that. Or consider the censorship threat, as Crovitz recently referenced:
Since the launch of the commercial Internet, the Internet Corporation…[more]
Barack Obama has undermined American interests in innumerable ways during his presidency, both domestically and abroad.
As we detailed last week, one cannot identify a single important theater of the globe in better condition today than when Obama and his Secretary of State Hillary Clinton took office in 2009.
Domestically, Obama's policies have caused the worst cyclical economic recovery in recorded U.S. history, amassed higher deficits and total debt than any administration in history, reduced voters' trust in the federal government to record lows and even worsened race relations. …
"Drama over Tuesday night's Democratic debate has disinterred an important question from liberals: Why is the party establishment so scared of having voters see their presidential candidates on TV? ... the Democrats have limited the number of their debates to just six, compared to the Republicans' eleven. Even worse, they've scheduled them for time slots when few other than hardcore supporters will…[more]